[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

and shitslinging
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, swf, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


Rules Log Spot Those Who Glow Protect Yourself
Use promo code "PSYOP" at checkout!

File: 62c490ad3183fa9⋯.jpg (18.42 KB,444x514,222:257,poke_holes.jpg)

1c9908 No.389244

For simplicity sake, I'll just say there is a right and a left.

The American left has basically no ability to fight. They have almost no guns and more importantly, no gun culture. Their best elements would be niggers who can't shoot for shit and maybe Mexican gangs, but they'll kill as many shitlibs as right wing White people.

However, they have complete institutional support and their own support networks are well developed and experienced. They can assemble 1 million "people" in a city on a whim. They're kind of like goblins in that sense. Numbers but poor fighting ability.

The "right" has a lot of gun experience and a significant number of military vets would support a right wing faction in a civil conflict.

However, the right also has no institutional support and has zero support networks. A right wing protest is lucky to be more than a dozen people from the local area.

All that said, one advantage that the right possesses by accident is that given the nature of an asymmetric conflict, maybe this isn't even a bad thing. After all, the primary target for insurgents in a low intensity conflict is the support network for the enemy side. Given that the right totally lacks one, what can the leftist terrorists even attack?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2cd787 No.389401

Radical leftists do have institutions and government backing them, and the numbers. That is what gives them the ability to really destabilize the rest of the nation, which in all honesty they are already doing rather successfully via destroying domestic energy production, arson attacks against the food supply chain, allowing an open border invasion into the country, weaponizing the bureaucracy to shut down utility production for average consumers, clot shot jabs, poisoning the food and water supply, etc. However, there is blowback which they never seem to consider: doing this will eventually lead to their own demise too.

Rational conservatives (excluding the insane RINO/neo-con types) tend to have a lot more land, tend to live more rural, tend to be well spread out and well distanced from leftist crazies mostly confined to the urban slums. The fact we have so much of our own local jurisdictions and land far from reach makes it a lot harder for radical leftists to fully control, police or takeover. The guns absolutely do give us an advantage to be able to defend ourselves too, no doubt about it. However, we do not typically have large numbers unlike the crazies do. That is our disadvantage. That is why local communities need to be able to band together to keep the crazies out of town come SHTF.

My honest opinion is that civil war will not happen for a couple reasons: the US is deeply vulnerable today and no longer energy independent. Any massive crisis in the US will likely crash the economy, nations will notice immediately and bail from using the US Dollar when it comes to international trade. Many countries may stop trading with us completely due to the risks of such destabilization, designating our country a hostile failed state. Thus most Americans would be too busy dying of starvation and lack of sanitation to be able to fight any long-term internal war. The ones able to defend themselves and families long-term would be the rural preppers and homesteaders with a years worth, or more, of food preservation, who could garden, hunt and fish too, and who have prepared for such dark times ahead.

Another reason, as you stated in the OP, is that primary targets during war typically need to be known and identified in advance. How do you deal with logistics that way when you have millions of gun owners all spread out all over the nation, living from the river sides, valleys, farm land, mountains and anywhere in-between? Most leftist urban dwellers have absolutely NO IDEA how fucking massive America really is.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

2cd787 No.389403

>>389401

>My honest opinion is that civil war will not happen for a couple reasons

There is one more wild card to throw into this. What is the biggest backbone of our economy? What one job, if taken away completely, would KILL America as we know it if they were to stop working? What is the single most job across America that *everyone* relies on?

It's the truckers!

If you piss enough of these people off, they can literally shut this nation down, including the federal government, overnight.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]