Hypothetical

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

File: 4ef052c78c82592⋯.jpg (101.12 KB, 1072x1053, 1072:1053, 82bfb93853cc4dc487c3e36ced….jpg)

Hypothetical Anonymous 02/05/19 (Tue) 14:05:37 No.97450

Let's say we live in a world where fire extinguishers cost one penny (at our current exchange rate)

Would it be an immoral imposition on the part of the state to require fire extinguishers in rented housing at the threat of a fine?

Anonymous 02/05/19 (Tue) 14:27:48 No.97451

If that would be the only power this theoretical state has, it wouldn't be a problem.

The problem is that when you give an entity central authoritarian power, it will cause other actual problems. And now you're stuck with it because it has authoritarian power.

So basically it's a bad tradeoff for little benefit.

Anonymous 02/05/19 (Tue) 15:50:10 No.97453

Yes. Unless a formal agreement has been entered into no party has the right to forcibly extract a fine from another. Furthermore, the fact that fire extinguishers are only a penny makes the prospect of the state forcing the responsibility to buy them on landlords even more ridiculous since the tenant could easily take responsibility for their own safety and buy one themselves.

Anonymous 02/05/19 (Tue) 16:59:18 No.97456

>>97450

>immoral

lmao what even is moral like lmao you cumskins invented that gay ass term and now you have niggers cucking you up hahah

Anonymous 02/05/19 (Tue) 17:57:25 No.97457

>>97456

Morality is the framework by which we place value on actions.

Anonymous 02/06/19 (Wed) 00:11:50 No.97493

Howdy pardner.

>Would it be an immoral imposition on the part of the state

YES

It's funded by theft so everything they do is fundamentally immoral.

Anonymous 02/06/19 (Wed) 05:32:01 No.97503

File: 969be8d8d6134db⋯.webm (91.69 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, nanananananananananananan….webm)

>>97450

If engine oil is dirt cheap and your friend doesn't oil up his engine leading to it destroying itself from the inside, do you blame "society" for not imposing mandatory oil fillings or do you blame your friend for being a fucking dumbass and not lubricating his car engine?

Anonymous 02/06/19 (Wed) 05:33:59 No.97504

File: 9b55f0a54909211⋯.png (392.68 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 2a7be484c91ce19bb24963ed19….png)

>>97503

Second question before the inevitable "but what if the fire burns someone else's house down too?"

If your friend lost control of his vehicle due to not oiling it and the engine dying causing him to spin out or something and cause a giant wreck, do you blame society or do you blame your friend for not fucking putting oil in his vehicle?

Anonymous 02/06/19 (Wed) 10:18:10 No.97510

>>97450

yes

Anonymous 02/07/19 (Thu) 04:08:27 No.97544

Howdy.

Anonymous 02/07/19 (Thu) 13:18:53 No.97553

>>97503

>>97504

So is this like you trying to tell us something

Anonymous 02/07/19 (Thu) 13:49:11 No.97554

>>97553

Well he's broadcasting that he's a huge fag. Other than that I think he's just agreeing with everyone else that anything a State does is immoral.