/liberty/ - Liberty

>>92447

>What am I?

OP is always a faggot. It sounds like you're a minarchist that still holds some naive optimism on the sanctity and functionality of elections.

<Love a republic, but notice US corruption and gov overgrowth

You're halfway towards correct; you're aware of the problems but you haven't yet seen that our being a "republic" is the source of those problems.

<Definite no nation building, but should intervene or keep intelligence with competitive powers

So you don't like nation-building but are just fine with all the other interventionism?

>Here is the difficult part.

Difficult how? Nothing anti- or pro-libertarian about noticing coincidences, it's just a fact of life.

>What is the solution?

Remove government and you remove Jew's ability to influence you.

>>92449

>haven't yet seen that our being a "republic" is the source of those problems.

I don't see a benefit to removing government. I like not having to shoot looters on my property, and being able to own land. I like police and fire services. But, I dont like being restricted on building or improving a business because of regulations. It seems that it would be chaos and dangerous without a government. Other nations would arrive and conquer.

>don't like nation-building but are just fine with all the other interventionism?

Self defense interventionism I mean. If China could establish their US proxy candidate as president they would. A nation needs protection against that without unnecessary interventions.

>>92447

>Other nations would arrive and conquer.

It's a completely new poster. If only we had a FAQ somewhere, because I'm not in the mood to regurgitate the same old arguments.

>>92451

Sorry >>92450 is OP, me

>>92451

Our BO is the ultimate OP on the scale of gayness.

Also,

>I don't see a benefit to removing government

>not having to shoot looters on my property

>I like police

>chaos and dangerous without a government

Lurk for 2 years and kill yourself, you disgusting newfag.

>>92454

So you are saying goosestep on back to /pol/? I came here searching for answers.

So far I've got

>remove government

and you >>92454 saying

>remove government doesn't mean removing police, remove government doesn't mean you are vulnerable.

>newfag

do you see what your post is implying? All the while you are parroting ad hom thick with self superiority. It may be because you can't define a clear definition of what you believe in.

>>92450

>What am I? And do you agree?

OP, you are basically me from two years ago, and yes, I agree for the most part. The problem is that we love traditionalism and some ideals of fascism, but we disagree with /pol/ on how to achieve those things.

>What is the solution?

Normally I would say DECENTRALIZE AND PRIVATIZE EVERYTHING. But admittedly this sounds extreme to any newfag, so just check out Hoppe, bruh, you'll love Hoppe, then move on from there.

>>92451

>It's a completely new poster. If only we had a FAQ somewhere

This. Instead we have a sticky welcoming leftytranny rapefugees.

>>92466

>FAQ

http://v.i4031.net/StatistFallacies

This used to be a pretty nice one-stop shop, but it seems like it got nuked.

>>92457

I said lurk if you are too stupid to read the very basics by yourself, faggot. I'm not going to waste my time on explaining shit to such a humongous retarded cunt like yourself, you're even less knowledgeable than /leftypol/. Go back to cuckchan, facebook or youtube comment section and kill yourself.

You sound like a minarchist/classical liberal/inconsistent libertarian. You're on the good way, now look at your premises abd draw all conclusions.

>>92466

>We agree on the ends, but disagree on the means.

This. The state breeds degeneracy. The natural aristocracy doesn't require force for people to follow them. Socialism doesn't become anything better than death just because you apply it to a homogenous society. If humans were devils, the state would be the epitome of devilry. If humans were angels, the state wouldn't be needed. Nowhere inbetween does the existence of the state become a boon.

>>92466

Decentralization and privatization vs remove government makes a lot more sense. I've been looking for a new book, I'll get Hoppe.

>>92470

>Anti-Elitist Patriotic Paleolibertarian

Definitely can see this.

>>92477

I've talked with /leftypol/, even though I hate communists with a passion, some seem well read. They glorify cockshott over there, but it could be the edgy commy YouTube clips that gets them off.

>>92493

Yeah, commies love to read for sure, but they only read their trashy leftist literature and nothing else. When commies tell you to:

>read a book

They are basically telling you to stop thinking for yourself and brainwash yourself with commie lies and propaganda, because only by escaping reality can you start to believe their bullshit.