/liberty/ - Liberty

>>90080

>prove me wrong post

Will you guys ever stop doing this? I will read them and you are not obliged to a single answer to anything until you present your own arguments, and THEN link to a source that explains further.

>>90082

Lol sorry, I was just being cheeky. I don't say I'm agreeing with him, only wanted to see if you guys can argue against his points.

>>90084

The author provides all the sources in the articles and with quotes.

>>90085

You're still missing the point. Don't throw information at people expecting them to obey or consider themselves wrong by default. We've already read shitposts from this guy in lengthy threads months ago and the OP was yet another smug redditor. To have any reason to keep doing so you'd have to make your own argument on a specific topic. Then you can point to a full post by anyone.

>>90086

>already a thread

I wasn't aware of that. Is the thread still up?

And I don't have any specific topic, any article would be equally good. If you don't want to answer for whatever reason then just don't, no need to give some conditions. Sage and move along, there are other posters on this board that could be interested in tackling the author's arguments.

>>90080

https://rickkelo.liberty.me/debunking-keynesian-economics-part-1/

>Governments are in a much better position to plan roads and highways and transport systems generally, precisely because they tend to have access to much better information than the private sector.

An assumption without any evidence to support this claim. The price mechanism already provides the necessary information for the market system, so I do not see how transportation cannot be privatised like other industries.

Pretty much the whole article is a list of assumptions.

You are unnecessarily complicating sex with animals. There is no good reason to make people jump through hoops to have sex with an animal you dont intend on giving up and nobody expects you to give up. There is no reason to work or pay for sex when there are so many animals in the world and not so many people looking for sex with them. Supply and demand says the sex is not worth any more time than what it takes to get there and do it.

You people are not special and you have nothing special, if you are not paying me to have sex with animals then you are lucky if im doing it for free.

the economics and reasoning of the site is good, BTFO austro-tards completely, but here it goes out of its depths:

https://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/p/the-philosophy-of-postmodernism-and-its.html

>some of the most pernicious ideas that Postmodernism has given rise to are the following:

(1) the view that there is no such thing as objective truth;

(2) cultural relativism and the view that there is no such thing as objective morality;

(3) the view that modern science is not objectively true and just one “narrative” amongst many “narratives,” and

(4) the view that no text can have a fixed meaning intended by its author.

all these are false, I dont feel like answering them, but for a brief overview view these

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHtvTGaPzF4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSuEccEYvaE

>>91371

>all these are false, I dont feel like answering them

I guess that is you "subjective interpretation" :)