>>82290
>is it ok to use violence to overthrow statism?
Sure, but violence in of itself (as a revolutionary means of overthrowing statism) doesn't actually present a very good idea of what will happen moving forwards. Often times revolutions just lead to a worse system and a larger collapse after the fact.
That's not to say that is some sort of inherent rule per se, but you'll notice most violent revolutions through out history very rarely propagate governments that solve the problems of the previous regime, often they just expand on those problems. It's an unpopular opinion in the US, but even the American revolution had quite a bloody and stunting aftermath, one of the only things that prevented the economy and the whole country getting worse (worse than it already was, that is) was the fact that the American government didn't intervene in the French revolution and used the French revolution as an excuse to not pay massive debts owed to the French government.