/liberty/ - Liberty

>>81261

Old bait

>Showing how central planning is good seduces people into supporting politicians who nationalize everything, Even though total central planning is a myth, and Socialism will never ever happen

Everyone can make empty platitudes disparaging their opponents, come back when you have something important to say

And from another side, I heard that Rothbard loved the Soviet Union and hated America. Instead of ten people doing this shit, can you morons elect one actual economist or philosopher to disprove the action-axiom or the principle of self-ownership?

>>81272

>I heard that

Hearsay? Really? You're resorting to hearsay, now?

>>81281

>>81272

Sorry, forgot to take off my shitposting flag.

Yes, from some interview between two Israelis. One of them eventually said that Rothbard supported the Soviet Union, because he said that the US was more imperialist than the Soviets. My point being, as a libertarian, you get slander from all sides. Why would I respond to it all?

>>81272

>disprove

>the axiom

really shrugged my atlas

>>81391

Words have more than one meaning. Here's one definition I found for axiom:

>a formal statement or principle in mathematics, science, etc., from which other statements can be obtained

This fits. The action-axiom is the starting point of the Misesian system of economics. There is no principle behind it that is more basic.

You could also say it's self-evident. You still have people try to deny it, just as there are people who try to deny that a thing can exist and not exist at the same time, but that is literally just mixing words together and pretending they mean something.

>>81393

I think it's confusing the way it's presented. In the example where someone does something to try to disprove the axiom, it is possible that the action was automatic. Maybe intents exist in the thinking related in the most general way with a future action.