/liberty/ - Liberty

>>80483

As unpopular as it is to say so, he is /ourguy/. Sorry /pol/ lurkers, you can go get fucked.

>>80483

If only he'd run as a libertarian party candidate,

Maybe in his personal lifestyle, but he actively funds and supports BLM and other groups diametrically opposed to liberty. So I'd have to say no.

>>80487

I think telling him how to spend his money violates the NAP. All he's doing is financing groups of people he believes will destabilize a government, then profit from it.

>>80489

I didn't say we should tell him how to spend his money, I'm saying we shouldn't endorse him because of it. He might not be violating the NAP, but BLM, the short-lived Democracy Spring, and the dozens of other activist groups he supports do. If they aren't actively rioting and causing property damage, these groups are explicitly working to expand state power and use the coercive violence of the government to their advantage, and Soros openly supports them. /ourguy/ indeed.

Yes I'm aware this is an obvious troll thread

>>80490

>>80487

This tbh. Soros is a socialist and a statist, and this thread was made by DnC shills for DnC shills.

Saged. Reported. Called the cops.

>>80490

Well, he doesn't need you to endorse him, he's a billionaire. Plus, him financing those groups doesn't violate the NAP himself, as you point out. Soros has damaged one national government and destroyed two, all for massive profit. If anything, George Soros is the greatest anarcho-capitalist to ever live.

>>80487

>>80490

BLM was protesting against state power, it's /liberty/ as fuck.

>>80513

BLM is dedicated to exploiting "tragedy" for personal gain.

If you are a lalala-libertarian, he is /ourguy/.

If you are a libertarian, then you wish you could throw him in the south pacific.

>>80515

Everyone gains from holding the police accountable.

>>80518

This, but unironically.

>>80513

BLM was chimping out so Madame President could federalize the police and good bois could dindu nuffin in peace.

>>80519

>incoherent hooting about the police being part of a nationwide conspiracy to exterminate the blacks is "accountability"

OK.

>unironically worshipping the police on an antiauthoritarian board

>>80596

>blindly fellating any group that claims to be against police without critical thinking

This "troll" is completely right. He is a ancap in everything but name.

>>80519

You realize they aren't the only movement denouncing police brutality. They don't have the monopoly on it. Besides it got co-opted by some DNC types to use as useful idiots.

>>80675

Oh, so it's just a case "people I dislike support it so I must oppose it." That might have worked in kindergarten but in real life you often have to temporarily work with people you dislike to achieve your goals.

>>80688

No I was saying they don't have a monopoly on being against police brutality. I still oppose police brutality.

>>80688

And where do our goals coincide, exactly? BLM is against cops, that's it. It's not even "police brutality" anymore for them, they just screech "racist" at anyone wearing a uniform. Those few moments when they are coherent in their arguments, and aren't rioting and flipping over cars, the solutions they provide to this issue don't help us in the slightest. They want to increase the powers of the parts of government they see as "good" to regulate the "bad" parts. They want to replace the "bad" people with their own. Even if you assume that all of their complaints are valid (protip: none of them are), this is just another case of the ones with who perceive a boot on their neck desiring to wear the boot instead of getting rid of it. Our goals are nothing alike, and to insist that they are for the sake of cheap opportunism is moronic; it is the same sort of thinking that made Gary fucking Johnson the LP's presidential candidate. To discuss more recent items, you're acting the same as that tard in the LP who tweeted in support of the anti-gun student walkout. It's short-sighted and only hurts the cause in the long run.

>>80693

>BLM is against cops, that's it. It's not even "police brutality" anymore for them, they just screech "racist" at anyone wearing a uniform.

>They want to increase the powers of the parts of government they see as "good" to regulate the "bad" parts. They want to replace the "bad" people with their own.

The hell are you even talking about? The BLM movement quite explicitly states that police powers should be shrunk and that the war on drugs and mass incarceration should be ended.

Like the previous poster said, you're going to have to work with people you don't like to further certain causes. The anti Iraq War movement was spearheaded and kept afloat by literal communists. Doesn't mean we shouldn't have embraced it.

>>80859

>Doesn't mean we shouldn't have embraced it.

Yes it should you fucking faggot, chiefly because that movement only existed to aquire political power for the Democrat party and resulted in no reduction of wars being waged by the Empire of Washington.

Likewise fucking BLM was and is about enabling nigger criminal behaviour (mission accomplished partly thanks to police retreating from da hood) and giving pretext for a federalisation of the police force as explained in the docs recoved in the Open Society hacks.

>>80863

>I have a small dick: the post

>>80872

>t. I love being a useful idiot

>>80863

>I have no more arguments about why you should worship BLM so I'll joke about your penis

Christ. What are you going to say next, that guns are phallic imagery used by people insecure about their masculinity? What is it with lefties and cocks? They can't seem to discuss any topic without forcing them in (heh) somehow.

>>80515

>exploiting "tragedy" for personal gain

If your boobs are voluntarily helping you do it, then there is nothing wrong with causing economic and political calamity for personal gain.

>>80879

>using tragedy do convince daddy government to take your side and use force on your opponents

>voluntary

Sure thing bud.