[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8teen / cafechan / chicas / dixie / had / htg / thestorm / zoo ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


WARNING! Free Speech Zone - all local trashcans will be targeted for destruction by Antifa.

File: 1958593c45676b9⋯.jpg (7.43 KB, 209x233, 209:233, 1442295579997.jpg)

 No.74723

>US GDP 2016 18.624 trillion

>US GNP 2016 18.357 trillion

>267 billion worth of inflated currency from central banking policy

>crypto market capitalization 2018 571 billion USD

>571 billion withdrawn from circulation (USD and other fiat)

>stock market is growing

 No.74727

File: 054814d73a0089f⋯.jpeg (34.07 KB, 400x400, 1:1, peter schiff.jpeg)

>These digital currencies might make fiat look good. That's how bad they are.


 No.74729

File: fdfe6a3ad0380aa⋯.png (37.09 KB, 531x621, 59:69, 1444058372971.png)

>>74727

The only thing backing fiat at this point is that they're in use. The government doesn't know how much to print, so prints too much, and can't bring it back in with interest rates or taxation since those don't apply on savings unless they want to enforce it at gunpoint like during the period from the 30s to the 60s, eventually crippling market efficiency with national cartels, or be overthrown.

The cryptos hold no value but they destroy excess fiat. If someone is stupid enough to borrow money to buy crypto, which doesn't have value, they're an imbecile and their money deserves to be destroyed. The higher the value of crypto is the higher the amount of excess cash in circulation. Since it's excess cash that's produced no value it's equivalent to the zero value of crypto anyway.

Until crypto becomes institutionalized as a unit of exchange the risk of a zero crash exists, when simply no one will buy it. However, fiat is continuously inflating forever, there isn't enough precious metals, and thus it will be bought. And once someone accepts it as something of value, like the debt sticks in Medieval England, it becomes something of value.


 No.74755

>>74729

i sort of agree with this.

crypto currency has provided an attractive outlet for capital. that's the key word - an outlet. but ultimately the crypto currency scheme is simply part of the problem, and will not correct long-term misallocations.


 No.74759

File: cd0b61a620aaf41⋯.jpg (35.15 KB, 489x499, 489:499, bc8ee6299950c8156514041db2….jpg)

>>74755

They don't have anywhere else to put it. If they hold fiat as savings it generates zero value, in fact the alternative is burning it but that reduces the nominal value for spending purposes. Cryptos just hold it at zero until economic growth picks up and this is why the banks will love it. Of course, the banks will pull mass scale manipulation to steal people's money; as long as they keep out for scams (they won't) it "works".

Ultimately the money people have to spend, comes from the banks, so a cryptocrash would zero out excess value from the speculative loans and crash the banks in the process from the pursuit of speculative profits. Essentially the crypto growth rate can't exceed the inflation rate. If half the banks value is in cryptos and half of it in fiat, and they've promised profits, they won't be able to make it back. The government can't do another bailout because that would destroy the value of fiat, and a bail in is impossible since the nominal value was zeroed out in crypto.

Hold real assets.


 No.74767

>>74729

>>74759

investing in the cryptocurrency market does not "destroy" money, it transfers that money between two parties. and because cryptocurrency has the same (in reality, less) utility than fiat currency, ultimately the problem of accumulated capital and diminishing returns for investment in "productive" activities (which creates the incentive for speculative behavior) will continue the same as before, but the scattering of capital among various commodities will mask the problem.


 No.74776

File: a04269edb051724⋯.jpg (12.59 KB, 272x236, 68:59, 1457228790697.jpg)

>>74767

> the problem of accumulated capital and diminishing returns for investment in "productive" activities (which creates the incentive for speculative behavior) will continue the same as before

keep inflating the market to drive up nominal returns


 No.74790

>>74767

>ultimately the problem of accumulated capital and diminishing returns for investment in "productive" activities (which creates the incentive for speculative behavior) will continue the same as before, but the scattering of capital among various commodities will mask the problem

For the umpteenth time, this does not exist. Barring external market manipulation (as with a central bank), reallocated capital precedes an even greater rate of capital growth and accumulation, since subjective value necessarily implies that there is no upper limit to demand. Moreover, increase in market value is not strictly beholden to "productive" forces as Marx defined them (interest can accumulate independent of labor inputs). The only issue with cryptocurrency is an artificially inflated market value as a response to lack of faith in fiat currency. The same sort of crash could just as easily happen with precious metals, as their market value is derived from more than simply productive uses.


 No.74806

File: 727330f5dac7645⋯.jpg (18.27 KB, 290x290, 1:1, reaction.jpg)

>>74790

>Barring external market manipulation (as with a central bank)

so you are claiming what I said was wrong in an alternate universe which lacks central banks.


 No.74807

>>74767

it has a lot of utility since i can buy many things for it


 No.74815

>>74806

No, I'm specifically contesting the claim that you made alluding to TRPF to be something that occurred "before" currency manipulation by central banks.


 No.74822

>>74815

>the claim that you made alluding to TRPF to be something that occurred "before" currency manipulation by central banks.

except i never alluded to any such thing.


 No.74897

>571 billion withdrawn from circulation (USD and other fiat)

That's not how this works. Fiat vs. cryptocurrency is not a zero sum game. That money doesn't disappear because you spent it on bitcoin. It is only wealth created from speculation.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8teen / cafechan / chicas / dixie / had / htg / thestorm / zoo ]