/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-CNT republicans, because fuck Durruti. Because of the nationalization of industry and their distance from other communist countries, it would allow for accelerationism in our favor. On the other hand, having a syndie country there could destabilize postwar France, so it's a crapshoot.

I'd fight for property rights.

…

OF THE KING.

No, but seriously, There's a good chance I'd shoot at myself before I could bring myself to shoot at someone else. Even more realistically, I'd just dig a foxhole and "pretend" that I was shooting at the enemy (embed related). I'm too much of a wimp/cuck/{insert insult of your choice} for a question like this.

>>69591

Why the hate?

You a lazy faggot that can't do labor?

Nationalists.

Just as Orwell was there to pretend to be proletarian and kill nationalists, I would be there to kill socialists. After the war if I survive I would leave, because who the fuck wants to live in Spain?

Nationalists. At least they didn't desecrate graveyards or try to abolish money.

>>69608

That's a solid plan, too.

I'd kill myself for being Spanish

>>69606

Well if you don't know how to do any trade and only told people around your entire life then you deserve to be put in a labor camp.

>>69623

"Anarcho"communists, ladies and gents

>>69623

Would frequently switch sides only to prolong the war to a point it's impossible for any side to "win" anything. In a war in which either of the two major sides is my loss, I can only hope they destroy each other.

>>69627

Jeze petes man, do you even Condottieri?

>>69794

>when you think people who disagree with your property right deserve to be helicoptered

>>69824

That's a nonsensical complaint. Nonsensical because, if you truly didn't care about property rights, you also wouldn't care if anyone held a monopoly on them. As it is, however, you do care, because these goods are scarce and their distribution is important. The question, then, is not whether to distribute scarce resources but how to do it. And you would defend your scheme of distribution just as vigorously as we'd defend ours.

>>69813

> forced off of a island over a landlord dispute

This violates the NAP. Are you even trying?

>>69905

And in the case of an island that you own in its entirety, just tossing them in the ocean and telling them to swim somewhere else is ethically questionable at best. If you want someone off of your property but they're physically incapable of leaving, then it's your job to move them somewhere else.

>>69908

This. Evicting them still qualifies as killing. If every act of eviction was automatically just, then throwing someone out your window instead of letting him walk ten meters to the door would be just too, and that is obviously nonsense.

>>69905

Don't you remember the thread about right of way?

loaded question. the Falange but it was better pre-Franco

Either the Iron Column or the Durruti Column.

>>69843

There's a difference between apathy and disregard.

I'd flip a coin and try and flee into Portugal or France at the first opportunity. Neither side is worth killing or dying for and I don't really have an intense desire to find out first hand what war is like.

>>69909

Perfect analogy.