[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / freeb / gfd / komica / lgbt / miku / randamu / yuri ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: 7a96d09537efb87⋯.png (353.92 KB, 1440x810, 16:9, ClipboardImage.png)

c4d220  No.663700

>The American subsidiary of Swiss gunmaker B&T has won a multi-million-dollar contract to supply the U.S. Army with a variant of its 9mm APC9 submachine gun. For almost a year, the service has been evaluating a number of proposed weapons as part of an effort to give personal security details added firepower.

>The Army quietly announced that it had awarded B&T USA the deal, worth more than $2.5 million, on the U.S. government’s main contracting website FedBizOpps on Mar. 29, 2019, but did not specify which weapon specifically it was buying. A trusted source familiar with the contract confirmed the gun in question was a version of the APC9 PRO series, but could not say which model specifically. The Army now expects to purchase at least 350 of what it officially calls the Sub Compact Weapon, or SCW, with additional options to buy up to 1,000 of the guns in total. The order also includes unspecified accessories, spare parts, and services.

>The Army initially kicked off the SCW competition in May 2018, before canceling the project and quickly rebooting it in a revised form two months later. Along with B&T USA, its Swiss-headquartered parent company had also entered the SCW competition itself in partnership with Trident Rifles. The Army passed on that bid, along with other offers from Angstadt Arms, Global Ordnance, Shield Arms, and Sig Sauer all of which submitted entries, as well.

>Reports in 2018 had indicated that B&T, through Trident Rifles, had initially offered a variant of the company’s MP9 machine pistol. However, this gun has a side-folding stock, which would have disqualified it under the Army’s revised requirements.

>Though we don't know the exact configuration of the guns the Army is now buying, the APC9 PRO family of guns already includes a variant, the APC9 PRO K, that meets a number of the Army’s requirements, such as a barrel shorter than five and a half inches, a weight under seven pounds, and a stock that retracts and extends rather than folds to the side. B&T presently offers this gun with only a semi-automatic fire option, while any Army version would have a fully automatic mode.

http://archive.is/xwO7z

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27261/this-is-the-armys-new-submachine-gun

136166  No.663702

It looks cool. Unbelievably compact and small, probably will do just fine for the purposes it was intended for.

Begs the question though; What for? Low usage weapons like SMGs are barely needed today, who is it for? This is a small lot, of course, but that still doesn't explain it. Just having them for the sake of having them? Tank crews are the only position where I could see this being actively used and they carry M4s, no? This seems like something you'd give to secret service, not the Army.


ddbff7  No.663703

>>663702

"The service is buying hundreds of these weapons to arm personal security details guarding VIPs in high-risk environments."


136166  No.663704

>>663703

But this appears to be for the army, isn't the Secret Service an unrelated organ?


94c94a  No.663707

Why is the magwell a hotdog in a hallway? This isn't some bubba'd AR-9, they have no excuse.


0602d6  No.663709

>>663702

They're neat range toys.

>>663702

They're under the department of homeland security.

>>663707

Its has an angle on the inside if I recall, i.e you can panic a mag in.


37036a  No.663710

It's going to be an overpriced, overbuilt ghetto blaster. If a submachine gun does not cost less than $300 it should be ignored


eb4611  No.663711

>>663702

Vehicle crews have been in a very difficult spot ever since the M3A1 grease gun was retired at a time when the P90 was looking to readily replace it without any G*rman ass blastedness getting in the way. Some crews like Nicholas "if they aren't a Christian sect, fire for effect" Morran's Barely Legal for example, got Three M4s, an M16 with underslung M203, mossberg 500, a fucking M249 and then their side arms of M9s all just for a single M1A1. Meanwhile Bradly crews were given a handful of M231 port firing weapons for their now sealed with the exception of the back ramp firing ports if they were lucky. There are countless pictures of less fortunate crews who were given jack and shit for dismounted combat and chose to make due with Iraqi MP5 and even PPSH42 clones. With any luck this might bring some normalcy back into it.


f9ff8b  No.663712

>>663704

yes, but the army also supplies security details for senators, and other representatives abroad. the marines usually guard the president if a military escort is needed.

I suspect this is from army black-ops, uber-supermen MOS.


f9ff8b  No.663717

>>663711

I just assumed everyone carried a M4 or M16, and prior to that, an M16.

the M4 is basically a rifle capable SMG. kind of like the AK74u.


61b796  No.663719

>>663707

Forgive me if I am wrong but the lower does look like an AR lower. I suspect this is done much like the highpoint carbine does and uses the military's existing parts that can be readily swapped- the army might only be actually ordering the uppers.


0602d6  No.663722

>>663719

Lower can be switched to use common glock magazines.


412530  No.663724

>9mm smg number 6000000

Why do they keep making the same thing?


d00638  No.663725

File: 1d1e3388b2c4678⋯.png (305.08 KB, 776x598, 388:299, ClipboardImage.png)

>>663707

>The standard version uses B&T’s proprietary magazine design. There are two others available that can accept Glock pistol magazines and those for the Sig Sauer P320 series. The latter is particularly notable given that, in 2017, the Army picked versions of the P320 as its new standard sidearms as part of the Modular Handgun System (MHS) program.

>This means that the Army’s version of the APC9 could use the same ammunition and magazines as its new standard issue pistols. This would give any individual equipped with the SCW immediate magazine commonality between their primary and secondary weapon, which could be extremely valuable in even a brief firefight. It would also allow personnel with one of the submachine guns to exchange magazines back and forth with individuals who are only armed with a pistol, if necessary.

>Beyond that, it would help reduce logistical requirements for the new submachine guns. The service does say the SCWs will need to have 20 and 30 round magazines, but it is already buying 21-round P320 magazines as part of the MHS program and there are 30-round options available on the market.


eb4611  No.663726

>>663717

Everyone got an M3A1 until shortly after the gulf war. Yes it would make sense for everyone to just get M4s now, but it was never an offical thing so it varied from unit to unit. Like I said, hopefully it will bring order to chaos.


66b57d  No.663728

>>663719

No, the lower is the standard one from their SMG - APC9, which this gun is clearly a version of.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Br%C3%BCgger_%26_Thomet_APC9

As for all this fluff, B&T is a pretty good weapon manufacturer and makes pretty high quality firearms but this gun, despite probably a good finish, is not that well designed. As i said, the gun seems to be a slightly shortened version of the APC9 with a different stock and without a vertical grip, as well as slightly shorter mags with weird pads on their bottom. The original gun's weight is 2.5kg with the aimpoint that comes with it so this might be ~<0.5kg lighter, the barrel probably is around 4" instead of 6" of the original, while the ridiculous fire rate of 1080rpm is probably unchanged. It can also use 45acp so it might be intended for suppressed fire.


66b57d  No.663730

>>663724

Because it sells well, even better than plastic striker fired pistols.


194321  No.663732

>>663700

Wow the army actual making smart weapon choices holy fuck


f9ff8b  No.663733

>>663726

so now that we are standardise on our firearm plat form, why don't they just hand out lowers/bolts and let the units build them like legos or something with after market parts?


968fbc  No.663734

>>663702

Helo crews, vessel crews, MP's, security personnel, ect…

>>663712

>yes, but the army also supplies security details for senators, the marines usually guard the president if a military escort is needed.

The Army provides passive security for representatives when they're traveling in areas the Army is operating, otherwise security for Senators/Congressmen falls to whatever agency maintains security at the locale they're visiting (i.e. embassy would be CSS and Marines, Naval base with be Navy, ect…) otherwise a Senator/Congressmen has no security detail outside of DC, unless they're within the direct line-of-succession. The President's Marine escort is a different situation altogether, the Marines provide airlift support and White House security, but the Secret Service maintains Executive Protection at all times, while coordinating with other agencies and departments.

>>663726

Nothing like putting a rifle rack in a tank, only to never actually put a rifle within a crews TO&E.


ee278f  No.663749

>>663700

So when is (((SIG))) going to demand a retrial?


9dc3ae  No.663768

it is so fucking ugly holy shit


ee278f  No.663774

What is this meme of crypto-9mm AR with a 2 inch barrel? Why not something like an MP9 which is not only more compact, but has a much longer barrel?


86d016  No.663786

>>663728

>>663702

They've said it: security details.

>>663711

>Vehicles crews.

No.

>>663700

>As for all this fluff, B&T is a pretty good weapon manufacturer and makes pretty high quality firearms but this gun

B+T has 20 employees, they're a suppressor company for the Swiss police (and supply basically everyone in Europe), they make guns as a side job.

They can make 350 to a 1000 guns in a couple of years sure but that's about it.

They just cannot fulfill an order for US army crew weapons, also it's illegal per Swiss law to export military equipment (policing equipment is ok, hence why it's probably for MP security or something. "APC" means Advanced Police Carbine IIRC).

If they were to get a big military order they would have to partner with an exterior firm like SIG (Swiss) & Sauer (German) to actually make the guns. Knowing B+T it would most likely be Steyr (Austria).


37036a  No.663791

>>663725

Oh I get it now, it's gimmick is that it's ultra modular with lots of fancy accessories, perfect for an army that thinks more technology is a substitute for skill and experience


1612d0  No.663808

>>663733

Would honestly make a lot of sense. Give each boot a few thousand to build the rifle with the only rule being (must be in 5.56) would be interesting to see how units design rifles around their job. Units may begin identifying with common setups and stylizing their pieces.


d788f8  No.663812

>tfw you will never see an army adopt the IDW as a standard PDW for memes and giggles


e2583d  No.663814

>>663717

Go back to cuckchan with your armchair retardation.


d62c65  No.663815

Roughly $7,000 a piece for a 9mm submachine gun.


98d935  No.663821

>>663815

It would still be a ripoff at a tenth that cost.

I expected nothing better.


721615  No.663825

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>663700

Retarded requirements

Retarded gun

Big Mistake


f9ff8b  No.663829

>>663808

I could see how it could get out of hand just have the O-3 approve purchases, any if the solder wants anything not within that budget, just ask O-3 or he can buy it himself, I know a lot of civies who would love to give these guys simple stupid stuff like this, I also think the USO has a program for this.


63aede  No.663830

>>663821

Like 2500 USD in leafland for one.


ee278f  No.663835

>>663825

>barrel 2-3x the length

>much better mags

>actual operating system, not just direct blowback

>smaller and more compact

>"REEEEEE, IT'S NOT AN AR! WE NEED TO ADOPT SOMETHING THAT LOOKS LIKE AN AR"

When will armalitefags fuck off?


721615  No.663836

>>663835

also

>weights 2 pounds less

>still super controllable on full auto


f9ff8b  No.663865

>>663835

its a cost thing, the US military literally chose the AR platform so logistics could simply replace parts more easily and there was less "variation" in specialist parts that didn't need to be specialized.

this dates back to the 1960s when Kennedy's administration went ham and saved a lot of military over-site form have role dedicated firearms to having a single platform with role dedicated parts.

most of small arms development like the beloved rail system came from this line of thought, I'm certain Brittan has its own version but this has and is working well for the US military. the AR platform was specifically made by stoner with this in mind hence its minimalist design.

>fuck off britfag.


e512eb  No.663870

File: 9ac935d8636d951⋯.jpg (25.98 KB, 251x298, 251:298, 1424883315494.jpg)

>>663835

>>663836

half of the threads on /k/ are just people complaining about how much money the US needlessly spends.

>hey maybe we shouldn't spend millions of dollars on something we don't need

>FUCKING ARMALITE FAGS REEEEEE


f90d95  No.663871

>>663710

If anything a modernized grease gun would be nice, not saying the military wouldn't fuck that up too though.


37036a  No.663890

>>663865

The AR is shit and a military failure, death to intermediate infidels


e512eb  No.663899

File: 98cad5d394fe3ca⋯.jpg (6.98 KB, 255x206, 255:206, 1425675483248.jpg)


f9ff8b  No.663902

>>663890

>at-least make an argument, not an accusation

>>663871

I take your dedicated grease gun and raise you an AR15 platform AR18 upper with a 9mm chamber and bolt and a mag-well mount for whatever mag you have available.


37036a  No.663904

>>663902

>>663899

Sorry intermediots, this is battle rifle gang territory


f9ff8b  No.663906

>>663904

>AR 15

done a battle rifle.


b5cf94  No.663911

File: c0042a9a032c2c5⋯.png (109.87 KB, 275x225, 11:9, 10mm_SMG_concept_art.png)

AHAHAHAHA holy shit it looks uglier than Hi-Points. Your army should just invest in pic related. Everyone will be disoriented thinking your ZOGbots are just Bethesda NPCs, that's better than tacticool advantage. You shouldn't let the spaghetti-armed FBI cuck you out of using 10mm.

>the deal, worth more than $2.5 million

>The Army now expects to purchase at least 350 of what it officially calls the Sub Compact Weapon, or SCW, with additional options to buy up to 1,000 of the guns in total

Money spent almost as well as Israeli defense aid.


5871e5  No.663916

>>663700

meh, IMO the best layout for SMG/PDW is the Uzi or "pistol on 'roids" with mag in the grip. Its basically the bull-pup SMG, but unlike a bull-pup rifle, it doesn't seem fraught with balance and other ergometric issues, or bad trigger.

Only reason I'd want mag ahead of trigger would be if its quad-stack.


721615  No.663919

File: 09ffe586da90ea9⋯.jpg (58.14 KB, 900x620, 45:31, 213123.jpg)

>>663916

>quadsacks


fa8d30  No.663948

>>663919

trommelmag mk2000


ee278f  No.663987

>>663865

Except nothing on the APC9 is interchangeable with the AR-15 it just looks like one.


82a221  No.664075

looks like a retarded ar pistol


df49fb  No.664080

>>663902

>I take your dedicated grease gun and raise you an AR15 platform AR18 upper with a 9mm chamber and bolt and a mag-well mount for whatever mag you have available.

Why would you use a piston upper on a direct blowback bolt? You fucking stupid? Also magwell mounts are gay. Just get a dedicated lower that takes glawk or colt mags.


ee278f  No.664091

File: bf909563459257a⋯.png (107.3 KB, 600x318, 100:53, ClipboardImage.png)

>>664080

>9mms can't be piston operated

Cohen would like a word


949468  No.664107

File: efe773636eb1aa4⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 92.97 KB, 1030x605, 206:121, MP5A3_Decoupe_HecklerUndKo….jpg)

File: 60a0a8db9f8ef72⋯.gif (Spoiler Image, 834.09 KB, 450x320, 45:32, I can only get so erect.gif)

>>664091

>Cohen would like a word

What about? The holocaust?

Spoiler for lewd


379303  No.664156

why 9mm and not 5.7?


215604  No.664159

>>664156

Because 5.7 is shit, especially from short barrels. 9mm with hot loads can get superior performance against both soft and armoured targets, for far less cost of all parts.

>inb4 >military-industrial complex saving money


4ba80c  No.664183

>>664156

Needle round that had unsatisfactory performance on soft targets, even when pushing through armor/hard cover.

9x19 is available in large quantities while already being in use and is "good enough" against soft targets.


94c94a  No.664189

File: b814b8b54a079c8⋯.jpg (75.71 KB, 697x524, 697:524, .50 BMG open bolt blowback.jpg)

>>664091

Of course they can be. Just like you can make a straight-blowback HMG if you want to, but that doesn't mean you should.


ee278f  No.664195

>>664156

Because the US army hasn't adopted 5.7mm


968fbc  No.664275

>>664156

>Why did the Army utilize a caliber already in it's inventory and not a glorified .22Mag cartridge with poor performance that isn't in it's inventory?

Gee, I wonder why…


dabc67  No.664281

Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>664275

It's a bad cartridge, but not that bad.


215604  No.664295

>>664281

Out of a barrel shorter than a Five-seven's and being shot at ranges longer than concealed carry shootings? It'll be worthless.


968fbc  No.664320

>>664281

Even if it isn't "that bad" in terms of performance, it's still stupid to consider from a logistical and operational standpoint. 5.7 is a solution looking for a problem.


5871e5  No.664324

File: 9b1798f1687fe60⋯.jpg (233.36 KB, 1290x1432, 645:716, 1550284131403.jpg)

I guess the Army choose to keep the ergometrics, in other words their existing TRAINING and muscle memory, of the AR, rather than retrain on a new optimized dedicated SMG platform.

Not the worse idea they've ever had. I'm pretty sure the "operator" will always be the weakest link in effectively using any gun, especially a SMG.


6b555e  No.665347

>>663919

>6 million rpm

>scope

>intended for close quarters and c&b environments

MAKE UP YOUR FUCKING MIND

>made in israel

The interesting thing is that if you want to see how a non fucked up army gun looks like Isreal always adopts the best things while US and NATO gets the short end because kikes will not allow the same. (not always the case. They too get attached to "their" designs)

Galil for example is a perfected Kalashnikov.

Uzi is a mac10 but better

Micro uzi is mac11 but better

The only problem with mac/uzi is its hunger for bullets. Obviously the kikes thought of this also and it can be converted to half of it's cycle speed.


87d439  No.665351

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Why an SMG instead of an SBR?


95e798  No.665354

File: beb80222939b1c0⋯.png (4.9 KB, 100x75, 4:3, Screenshot_2016-03-27-01-3….png)

>>665347

>Galil is a perfected AK

No, nigger.

>Uzi is a MAC-10

No, you stupid nigger, the MAC-10 was literally designed because the Uzi was too expensive and not reliable enough. The MAC-10 is the better gun for a military, and the actions aren't even similar.

>Micro Uzi is a MAC-11

Except the Micro Uzi is just a shitty cut-down fucking toy and the MAC-11 isn't even in the same caliber as the 10. It's a different gun altogether.

>converted to half of it's cycle speed

NO YOU UNEDUCATED REDDIT SPACING NIGGER


6b555e  No.665373

File: 88cb82d9c965e2a⋯.gif (181.96 KB, 480x210, 16:7, vector.gif)

File: 4f28a5c298bf4e0⋯.jpg (54.63 KB, 640x584, 80:73, lol.jpg)

>disqualifying weapons because of side folding stocks

This is not an excuse to disqualify better weapon designs.

They could've just asked any manufacturer to slap it on for them. It's not like an engineering prodigy to accomplish post production. Especially when they get a whole army to sell for.


f81b25  No.665429

>>663911

>Money spent almost as well as Israeli defense aid.

There'd be a 9/11 every week if US didn't support the only democracy in the middle east™ (^:


7a94e8  No.665445

Doesn't seem like a bad gun, but we've had good 9mm submachineguns since WWI. There's no reason to keep reinventing the wheel. What does this do the MP5 doesn't?


e1d752  No.665479

>>663774

I was just thinking that. The Israelis claimed to have great success with their UZI's, claiming the hand over hand method of reloading to be incredibly effective. My guess is the MP9 doesn't have magazine compatibility with the APC9, and that's what it boiled down to.


393346  No.665488

>>665445

it doesn't come with H&K's cost?


459470  No.665507

File: e4e8ddcf58956ab⋯.png (179.41 KB, 303x311, 303:311, 0 INT.png)

>>665347

Jesus Christus, KuK poster. Wat are you doing? This takes the prize for most retared shitpost on this whole board.

Everything you said was aggressively wrong.

Go home and think about your actions, you absolute retard.

The Galil was so shit not even the yids would use it.


87d439  No.665524

>>665479

>My guess is the MP9 doesn't have magazine compatibility with the APC9, and that's what it boiled down to.

They use the same mags iirc


aa9430  No.665528

>>663700

Why no bullpup?


87d439  No.665534

>>665528

Because bullpups are a meme if the magazine is small enough to fit into the grip


9dc3ae  No.665536

>>665534

yeah, so why not make it just like a longer pistol with a grip on the front?

l tell you this will be the design of the future


87d439  No.665540

File: d4bb1c307b7225e⋯.png (217.22 KB, 800x800, 1:1, ClipboardImage.png)

>>665536

Kurwa :DD


d99d2f  No.665545

File: 8d11b89d09c997b⋯.jpg (33.02 KB, 300x300, 1:1, 8d11b89d09c997bc394fc75aaf….jpg)

Is this related to the DOTR


a9fd53  No.665652

>>665540

This post gave me cancer.


f4d5c2  No.665842

lol gay gun


7a94e8  No.666128

>>665488

We're paying $2.5 million for 350 guns. Or maybe that's for 1000 I'm a bit confused. That's between 2500-7000 each depending on how the math should be done. Not much cheaper than what the government pays for an MP5, something like $2-2.5k. The MP5 was just an example anyways, the point I'm making is there are hundreds of good, existing designs for 9mm subguns and paying that 2500 for any of them is absolutely retarded when the government is paying under $700 each for an M4.


e92d94  No.666131

>>665347

>made in israel

Gypsy nigger that shit's from Sweden.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / freeb / gfd / komica / lgbt / miku / randamu / yuri ]