There's a similar challenge in the first circuit right now on what was ruled in the 9th circuit. Might be easier to separate them . Anyone up in the east coast ever heard of the organization called "commonwealth second amendment"?
Here's whats been filed by them currently
>GOULD V. MORGAN Challenge to firearms license restrictions that prohibit the possession, carrying, or use of firearms for personal protection
http://comm2a.org/55-projects/234-gould
https://archive.fo/uM46N
>MORIN V. LYVER
Challenge to the lifetime licensing ban due to a non-violent misdemeanor conviction
It's been filed but not ruled on by a lower court
>WORMAN V. BAKER
Challenge to the Massachusetts ban on the possession of so-called "Assault Weapons"
currently in appeal progress
Out of all of these, I think Gould is likely to be up in the air. Morin possibly might be in our favor as:
1) its a misdemeanor charge ( "On or about November 8, 2004, Dr. Morin entered a plea of guilty of Attempt Carrying a Pistol w/o a License (22-3294(a)(1)) and Unregistered Firearms (6-2376) in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. At the time of his charges, an attempted crime was a misdemeanor (§22-1803) in the District of Columbia and carried a maximum sentence of 180 days imprisonment.")
2) We just had that 9th circuit opinion examining a de facto ban (in this case the inability to gain a licence to purchase)
3) No fucking idea about Worman cause it's a direct challenge on the state ability to regulate the types of guns (especially long guns and muh scarry assualt rifles/ "High capacity magazines"). Might be an uphill battle as that would overturn precedent on a 9th? circuit ruling on CA and possibly the fucking NFA itself! Might also hindge off of Caetano v. Massachusetts
Any ideas? I've seen some outlets pickup the argument for (((them))) already. Not sure what will happen now.