If you are talking about equipment, I think they all look like shit. Nothing takes the purely aesthetic beauty out of a rifle than extra stuff on it. From a purely aesthetic point, PURE aesthetic, the LOOKS of tacticool guns are for children, specifically little boys and men who have the mentality of small children (usually somewhere in the autistic spectrum) the same way chainsaw bayonets are attached to guns in vidya games, and why every man in a vidya game now looks like a jacked up ROID RAGE super hero. Things that are over done and ridiculous looking are often "cool" to the kids and this is where the aesthetic market is going.
That and I honestly think they are trying to make guns look spastastic retard looking. Everyone fall sin love with a traditional rifle or shotgun, the beauty of old blue steel is something that is classic and timeless. People can fall in love with them. People aren't going to give up something as functional AND beautiful as a wood and steel gun. Tacticool shit, on the other hand, is so hideous, so visually pukish and unappealing, the ONLY reason you hold onto it is because of its function. So aesthetically displeasing they should be put into the gunsafe so you don't have to look at them, bear their awful ugliness.
When I see aesthetic guns, I say "That would be nice above a mantle". When I see tacticool shit I say "What the fuck, put that away, lock it away till needed, nobody should have to bear its image, cast it away to its own place like some sort of mutant child even its own mother struggles to love".