/k/ - Weapons

Knowing how shit jewllywood is, a F35.

F-35, it's already been in a shit ton of Hollywood movies since the mid 2000's.

Is Tom Cruise in any shape to even pretend of flying an aircraft?

What are the "bad guys" gonna be?

>>583448

>What are the "bad guys" gonna be?

An ebil Nazi misogynist Russian alt-right hacker known only as 4chan, who hijacks drones and uses them to display anti-semetic messages in the sky and harass female game developers.

>>583448

If they cared about quality it would be the Chinese, but since all they care about is selling as many tickets as possible to the lowest common denominator such as the Chinese it will probably be NK. Is fighting shit tier 60s soviet jets flown by a third world country exciting? No, but it is the go to "bad guy" for the media both for political reasons and simply because they are the only country that they don't see any potential market.

>>583448

The movie will be about cruise being hired as a mercenary by hollywood jews to strafe crowds of evil nazis protesting child love.

/ourguy/ Tom is back

>>583489

I want to habeeb.

>>583448

I predict the bad goys to be Russia-funded Iranian super hackers and alt-right facist soldiers supporting some generic dictator flying Su-57s and Su-47s while barrel bombing poor innocent LGBBQ rebel surgeons in Buttfuckistan.

Cruise will probably fly an F-35 equipped with an AI support waifu controlling drones and shit, there'll be a midair hacker duel where the Russiranians try to redpill the waifu through ebin menes but just as she is about to awake Cruise reminds her that freedom ain't free and to never forget the 6 million americans killed on 9/11, followed by both of them using the F-35B hover nozzle to make the Russiranian aircraft chasing them overshoot right below them while setting it on fire in the process due to the F135 engine exhaust temperature.

>>583489

>Tomcat

Iran still uses them.Maybe they'll be the enemy

DCS will be releasing their F-14 module in the near future, so I can make my own TopGun fun without Tom Cruise's cheesy acting and supporting Pedowood.

>>583526

>Was it so (((Politicians))) could push for the Tomcat's removal from service citing the large numbers of comparatively outdated and aging F-14As?

That's exactly what happened, although in this case it was mostly just (((Cheney))) versus everybody else.

>>583509

>kike who changed his name and dedicated his life to attacking jordan because jordan wouldn't "debate him"

>>583526

>The D version from my limited understanding seems more or less on par with the F/A-18C from a technical standpoint

Νοπε. It was vastly superior in everything minus operating cost. (and against real adversaries it would be more cost effective than F/A-18C/Ds that would drop like flies against anything more modern than a MiG-25).

>>583509

I wish i had the archive of /pol/ thread with JP's ties to (((UN)))

But clean your room bucko, ingroup preference is dumb and leads to unwarranted holocaust, sell your parents for organ, masturbate all day, but clean your room.

>>583531

Jordan Peterson is the less obnoxious Milo replacement, because that sodomite outlived his usefulness and didn't get AIDS

>>583544

>serious career going back 40 years

>published dozens of groundbreaking works

>twenty thousand hours of private treatment

>twice that in public practice

>over five hundred hours of lectures taped and online

How the fuck is this equivalent to a gay guy who says rude shit in public because liberals are afraid of stopping him? The fuck are Milos achievements even? What is his career?

>>583565

>the fuck is this equivalent to a gay guy who says rude shit in public because liberals are afraid of stopping him?

A single hair from the balls of a Greek, even it's a feathery faggot half-jew, worth 300 times the best barbarian. My only doubt on the subject is if Milo has any hair on its balls.

>>583507

But then the bad guys will be the ones flying F-14's, wouldn't they?

>>583442

Wasn't the original about ace pilots flying older planes and out piloting the opposition that had new technology?

So I presume they'll be flying older jets.

>>583633

No? Did you even watch Top Gun? They had F-14As and were fighting "MiG-28s" (aka F-5Es with black paint). The only reason we even got any action scenes in Top Gun was because they never launched the damn Tomcats with AIM-54s, which would have completely slaughtered most adversaries beyond visual range.

I honestly thought there was already a Top Gun 2.

>>583442

Tom Cruise is like an Aryan avatar of racial supremacy

>>583694

He's a scientologist and a fag. I understand how that may confuse you however, as CY+3 /pol/ is populated mostly by LARPers and cocksuckers.

>>583722

Ahoj, czech out Havaara Agreement.

>>583652

>>583652

>which would have completely slaughtered most adversaries beyond visual range

AIM-54 were not particularly effective against nimble aircraft unless not detected, and I believe the MiG-28 was supposed to be a MiG-29/F-20 equivalent which would mean both missile awareness and excellent maneuverability, particularly for defensive maneuvers thanks to top of the class instantaneous turn rate and AoA for both similar aircraft.

>>583728

>AIM-54 were not particularly effective against nimble aircraft unless not detected

And Soviet built aircraft typically had shit EWR and radar so it works out.

>>583771

>cuckchan wojack

I hate everyone in this thread

>>583775

That isn't a "cuckchan wojack", you dipshit

>>583775

>"hurr durr cuckchan"

>on redditchan

>>>/reddit/

>>583726

Don't forget manlet

>>583746

Not exactly wrong but given they always approached target from above a Russian pilot should be very drunk to not see it though it would need good reflexes too since its terminal phase speed was in excess of mach 4.

>>583810

Can we open a petition to change it to ASF-14?

>>583810

>>583442

F-18s are what currently go through Top Gun, not to mention that's whats pictured in the pic in OP.

also

>tom cruise as the Commodore of top gun

gross

t. navy fag that worked at top gun for 4 years, went through about 15 classes as a maintainer

>>583822

>t. navy fag that worked at top gun for 4 years, went through about 15 classes as a maintainer

One question for the insider. Is part of the official Navy policy to publicly shill for the wrong choices the high command made like shilling in favor of Super Hornet and F-35C over Legacy Hornet and ASF-14/Quickstrike Tomcat?

>>583522

>what is P2P?

>>583828

First, its not all big navy fucking up with decisions, its a lot of backroom deals with politicians and the sort.

Legacy F-18s are affectionately referred to as "legacshits" in the navy. Huge swaths of what remains of them are total hangar queens. This is mainly Cs and Ds. The marine corp still runs As, which are very noticeably sturdier, at least the airframe. Long story short, the only thing legacys have over supers is the ability to go supersonic under their own power.

Now the F-35C, and all variants really, is another matter entirely. That is just pure kikeheeb martin jewry. The JSF project was designed from the ground up to be a gigantic money sink that just so happened to eventually produce a jet. I have a few stories from friends at pax river about the woes of the 35s development. Some design oversights were just simply baffling/hilarious/depressing.

As for the 14, I never worked on one, I had only heard nightmare stories about them from maintainers. Miles and miles of wires, having to do splices on the run every event, that sort of thing. Given how much trouble the F-14s were to maintain and how much replacement parts were costing towards the end of their lives compared to 18s, its not at all surprising they chose to do what they did in that context. It is a shame we'll never really know how good the ASF-14 could have been, though.

>>584274

> Miles and miles of wires, having to do splices on the run every event, that sort of thing

Oh come on! That would not have been that bad on a 4.5+gen derivative. The Tomcat was the first 4th gen fighter and the only variable-wing Multi-role Air Superiority/Interceptor + secondarily Strike fighter in existence, it was kinda expected to be an attentionwhore and she fully compensated for it.

>The marine corp still runs As, which are very noticeably sturdier, at least the airframe

How comes so? Attempt for weight reduction in later variants?

Thanks for enlightening me btw. Before your post I was a mild legacy hornet apologist.

>>584280

2nded

>>583855

I don't think that movie is even going to be worth a torrent. It's just gonna be your standard Hollywood tripe.

>>584360

>How comes so? Attempt for weight reduction in later variants?

Yes I think so, the materials in As are much harder, and heavier, but its thanks to that that they're still able to fly, ++ style. There's other features that were removed going from A to C/D too, though all the ones I can think of were basically useless.

There's literally a f-18 in the picture…..

>>584646

How do you know it's literally and not CGIly? The pic is more blurry than Cruise' sexuality.

filter the kike and move on, everybody