>>582521
>The Russians have always been top notch in their wildfire response
It's because Russia has actually way worse fires than the US.
A gigantic part of Russia is covered in peatland and when the peatlands are dry in the summer the smallest spark can lit the whole thing (peat is used as combustible even today, it burn better than charcoal, downside is it's heavier), peatland fires are stupidly hard to put down by nature peat is made of decaying plants that have trapped air, you might extinguish the surface but the fire is continuing to smoulder underground, sometimes autumn heavy rains comes, it gives the impression to stops but it continues to burn through an entire winter, to only re-ignite in surface in spring, hundreds of kilometers away from the place you last saw flames…
Note that the job of Russian firefighter is more to manage those fires so they don't set fire to large wooded areas rather than try to prevent them (it's largely a natural phenomena in the first place) or truly extinguish them (because it's not really possible).
Also in the south they have things like crazy big reeds and grass plains that can pretty much flash fire.
When it comes to the natural disasters Russia is always worse than the US because most of the US land is used, one way or another, and therefore was thoroughly processed by mankind.
Russian fire and rescue services can only be an army because they're still engaged in a fight against a savage land.
When you explain to people that in Russia you can have cities with hundreds of thousands people that you CANNOT reach without plane (no roads, no railways, ports 2 month per year) and were nights can last 3 months, people think you're mad.
Russia is the colder and bigger version of Australia.