[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cafechan / cyoa / film / kc / leftpol / pdfs / sonyeon / turul ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: b7b5c328bedbbbe⋯.jpg (3.33 MB, 3000x2335, 600:467, M114_howitzer.jpg)

File: 130c04a42a4b42a⋯.jpg (542.45 KB, 805x584, 805:584, Type 92, without shield, a….jpg)

95640d No.561443

Mortars, howitzers, cannons, MRLSs, ballistic missiles, AA, CC and targeting systems, observation, whatever else you want to discuss.

Now, what's the name of that teethed "half gear" that changes the elevation of the barrel on older artillery pieces? And is it still used on modern systems, or were they all replaced by hydraulics?

7e16fb No.561448

I was talking to my old man the other day. Way back when, he got in some violent traffic dispute and was forced to join the military, and since he had a background in welding, he was put into the Seabees. Stayed there for thirty years. Now, he brought up a drill they were taught called 'mad moment', not 'mad minute', but mad moment. He described it as if their fortification was about to be imminently overrun, they were to receive a command through the radio that would repeat 'mad moment' a couple times and every able man was to start indiscriminately spraying mortars and grenade launchers in at least the vague direction of the enemy in hopes of breaking them. Problem is, I can't find a single mention of this absolutely anywhere online. I very much doubt he's lying or embellishing, so I ask, has anyone else heard of this before? Could anyone point me towards a solid reference?

Anyhow, more particularly on-topic with this thread, how prevalent was the use of heavy artillery in Vietnam? Considering we usually didn't know where the enemy exactly was, and the repeated relevance of airstrike and gunship runs, I can't imagine it was used all too often.


657dae No.561482

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

It must have been a hell of a hoot to be an artillery man during ww1.


491354 No.561511

>>561448

> how prevalent was the use of heavy artillery in Vietnam?

Wasn't Vietnam more or less the point where the US military gave up the struggle against the jet mafia? Can't have anything firing large explosive shells, you can drop those from a jet you see. I know it may sound odd put trust me, it's a lot more profitable … I mean effective.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cafechan / cyoa / film / kc / leftpol / pdfs / sonyeon / turul ]