[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cafechan / lds / leftpol / livecow / rolo / strek / travis2k / zog ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: 9bba11ea7b8f277⋯.jpg (343.1 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Revolution.jpg)

e12fe8 No.548977

I'm here to start a discussion one what would be needed to do an effective revolution.

Lets take the catalan case right now: It seems they have reached and Impasse and the EU is looking away as Spain practices Lawfare on the Catalans, and since it's the power of Law, if the catalans do not revolt, they will sooner or later be squashed by reformisim.

How could they actually do it? What would be the necessary steps % of population necessary to achieve such a feat.

My guess is that you need 2% of the population absolutley commited and a 5% pseudo commited.

35be46 No.548981

What's the matter CIA, don't have enough funding for your wargames scenarios? :^)

In all seriousness, you can assume that most of the population will sway to the revolters. Should I back the federal government who have been incompetent in the war, or these local insurgents that have been securing food and killing off the gang members? A revolution is comprised of brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, family people pushed far enough that they decide to push back.


fcd480 No.548983

File: 5a38f0253cd489b⋯.png (202.78 KB, 1802x905, 1802:905, Redplan1.png)

File: 5e5fca72033d91a⋯.png (100.1 KB, 1264x640, 79:40, Redplan2.png)

File: d087561657e5938⋯.png (136.96 KB, 1158x1393, 1158:1393, Redplan3.png)

File: 257bea4c2ad1fd0⋯.png (908.33 KB, 1875x1777, 1875:1777, Redplan4.png)

File: 5714faad06d9e7f⋯.png (144.6 KB, 1787x921, 1787:921, Redplan5.png)

>>548977

>My guess is that you need 2% of the population absolutley commited and a 5% pseudo commited.

The statistic I see thrown around is 5% bare minimum and 10% for a decent chance of success.


e12fe8 No.548993

>>548981

Not CIA. Regular joe here tired of the Spanish mafia.

>>548983

We have around 6% that would be commited. However it should be started in a non-violent manner, or violent towards infrastructure.


962e67 No.549035

>>548993

Overall? I can't imagine women being too involved.


e12fe8 No.549041

>>549035

Yep. People are extremely fed up with the spanish esstablishment lawfare. more women contacted me than men.

More men will join once they see its serious.


94f3a5 No.549060

File: 6a9b3598bfe3622⋯.gif (1.39 MB, 375x375, 1:1, thonk_smash.gif)

>>549041

so are you a real person or a commie?


8502ed No.549061

File: 1e8d8d0d73b3375⋯.gif (569.68 KB, 255x255, 1:1, 1443527377293.gif)

>>548981

>What's the matter CIA, don't have enough funding for your wargames scenarios?

>not wanting CIA to base it's wargame scenarios off /k/ shitposting


cffc23 No.549065

File: c2b6f2146c4c2ba⋯.png (1.71 MB, 1200x791, 1200:791, ClipboardImage.png)

>>548977

Get a major power to sponsor you. If you can get more than one power it's even easier.


0144e6 No.549136

>>548977

Isn't the number historically 7% or something like that? The exception of course is a civil war when you'll need a lot more.


f61fa3 No.549215

>>549136

Anywhere around that. 10% is where your ideas start spilling into the mainstream


cb33ac No.549513

>>548977

>I'm here to start a discussion one what would be needed to do an effective revolution.

First of all, you can't start a revolution if certain conditions are met first. Ever heard of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Same shit. Most of the times, you can stomp over the law and the people's rights if their most basic needs are met. They will get angry and pissy if their social networks are being spied by the government as long as they can eat, earn money and enough leisures to numb the brain.

No food, no money, no fun= shit will get real.

This is just one (and most of the times the main) of the reasons why a revolution starts. Ethnic and ideological (this includes religion) tensions are among others


9818b1 No.555697

File: 32f15be43620c89⋯.jpg (16.78 KB, 255x170, 3:2, 973235b50a990ca07f7160374d….jpg)

>people. Not just any peoplpeople, violent extremists that will do insane things. Timothy McVeigh was bitched about for decades because he knowingly committed suicide in all forms just to fuck up one government building. What happens when 20 McVeighs happen in a year and only a quarter of the perps are caught. Fear and chaos.

>You can spook pretty much every government agency outside of military by terrorist attacks. The fbi is incompetent and the atf are scared of doggies. Leo's have families.

>you need to fuck up banks, businesses, infrastructure, anything that will cost money to fix. You will eventually have to get in a shootout, but you can damage a government's funds to the tune of billions just by causing fear.

>kill people that speak against you. Target their families. Make it messy and post it online so the civilians can see what happens to the government people

>Get the military to commit acts of violence against your opponents. Communists, liberals, democrats are government supporters. False flag attacks and you can put a fifth column behind enemy lines

>free prisoners from jails and then blame the guards. Get cartels and gangs to shoot up the police. Chaos, uncertainty, and fear

>disrupt food shipments. Blow up roads and get people to starve and go hungry. Its like 6 meals until people start going survival mode.

>every bullet fired at the enemy is good for you. Create hostile forces of your enemy civilians and get them to shoot at you and the military so you can whine about muh evil leftists causing war and violence

>you must always be the victim. Bushwhack you political opponents AFTER they call for your imprisonment and sheeeit

>blow up high profile targets.

>DO NOT TARGET INNOCENT CIVILIANS

This makes potential recruits start their own movement because muh killing civilians is bad

>you must always justify your attacks morally. Killing politicians and elite families and government supporters is one thing, but firebombing a non leftist school is wrong. You are trying to free your people from a tyrannical government, not harm innocents.

Also dear alphabet this is hypothetical and I am not going to commit crimes nor do I endorse them :^)


2aab80 No.555744

>>549065

If your being support by an estblished power, it’s called treason not a revolution.

>>555697

>kill people that speak against you. Target their families.

That’s terrorism

>>548977

Guerrilla warfare is more psychological than anything else. Assassinate politions/business people who piss of most of the population. Get the established order to cack down on peaceful protesters. This does two things. It makes the established order look bad, and it makes peaceful protesters become violent and join your underground army. Use your violence to do things that increase your popularity. Then target police and military outposts through small guerrilla cells. Both a breakdown of rule of law and mass public support are necessary. Once both are achieved coming to power is as easy as walking into the capital building and declaring yourself to be the new government.


6f0882 No.555803

File: 9714df019f62e28⋯.gif (612.95 KB, 498x498, 1:1, 971.gif)

>>555744

>If your being support by an established power, it’s called treason not a revolution.

<Overthrowing your political systems is not treason

<but getting help overthrowing them is

>You can't kill people that speak against you! That’s terrorism!

>Use your violence to do things that increase your popularity.


d14143 No.555808

File: d16966f12ce3b86⋯.png (1.41 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, ClipboardImage.png)

>>555803

What was the Glorious Revolution then?


73b2a0 No.555818

>>555808

Proto-Communism.


9a7dbe No.555864

>>555744

You are aware that at least 90% of the various 'revolutions' around the world were run by (or at least instigated by) some other nations intelligence services, right?


c58666 No.555873

For a revolt to be successfully it needs support from the military or military aid from outside all the more so now when the government has tanks, IFVs and Helicopters and an advanced support and communication network.


97b127 No.555877

>>548977

In this day and age?

Popular opinion. For example, a second revolution in America can not happen unless you have the large plurality of the populace behind you. Mainly because soldiers are normal folks who have families. They care about their families a whole lot more then the federal government (and some do see themselves as serving the Nation and Constitution, not the government).

So what would need to happen? A massive government fuck up and a shift towards true tyranny.

The problem is any fighting is going to last…a couple weeks unless the government is suicidal. Brits thought they could put down the American Revolution because it was just Militia Men and philosophers. But if you have 30-40% of the country turned against you and a nice chunk of people who don't know what side they support the opponent is fucked.


8c19c5 No.555884

Step 1: Have a foreign ally to fund you

Step 2: Don't surrender


2ad7ff No.555919

>>555744

>If your being support by an estblished power, it’s called treason not a revolution.(sic)

Revolution is by it's very nature, a seditious and treasonous act.


72c074 No.555922

File: 4c4c0df7fb2a6e6⋯.png (557.21 KB, 1084x598, 542:299, officer samuel hyde.png)

>>555697

>How to defeat the government, and also reduce your country to complete shambles for at least the next several decades


9818b1 No.556682

File: 33b1497a6b0b0d4⋯.png (290.42 KB, 403x672, 403:672, 0ba92c072840e9e8d417b229c8….png)

>>555922

>implying that any violent revolution has not done a lot of damage

>wow its almost like this guy is not thin-

>sees flag


a65b9b No.556694

>>555697

>Target their families

>DO NOT TARGET INNOCENT CIVILIANS

What did he mean by this?

You're right on the latter though.


dce7b7 No.556698

The nature of modern warfare requires a revolutionary fighting force to be savy on fourth generation warfare and the necessity to use modern technology fully to your advantage. Think ISIS when it first started with it's surprisingly high quality propoganda videos. If you had a format that merged direct military action with mass media like ISIS did you could win.


6e67a3 No.556705

Looks like OP is getting his wish >>>/pol/11326320


a65b9b No.556707

>>556705

That post is utter nonsense.

It makes no sense even if you take everything it claims as fact.


a82e5e No.556709

>>549061

>Wargames happening in Langley

<"This is where we bring in the Glock suicide bombers sir"

>"You mean the suicide bombers are also armed with a 9mm pistol? That seems a little superfluous"

<"No sir, they use the glocks as explosives, they need very little modification to explode with the force of several lbs of Semtex, the research reports are summarised in appendix /8/k-19284 in the prep notes"

>"Huh, things you never knew. So after they blow up it's time for stage 3?"

<"Yes sir, and for this we'll need to requisition 317 pairs of very short shorts"

>"Ok … I also notice that these short shorts clad insurgents aren't issued body armour. Are you sure they're going to last long enough to make a difference at this stage of the exercise?"

<"It's OK sir, if you look through the prep notes you'll see that the latest studies *prove* that the 5.56mm rounds the security forces are firing are about as threatening as a shot from a waterpistol!"

<"We should probably make recommendations that all US agents and forces upgrade to H&K G11s immediately"

>"G11s?"

<"Yes sir, we estimate that they're 8 generations advanced from the G3s that were introduced at about the same time as the M16s our forces are currently using"

>"Good God! Order as many of these G11s as you can get hold of, NOW!"


a53e58 No.556712

>>556709

>Someone gets up and shoots them both, then himself for an attempt to dismantle the brass mafia by switching to caseless ammunition


a82e5e No.556716


df5240 No.556764

File: 02d52e0efdefe73⋯.jpg (201.97 KB, 800x632, 100:79, 4cc532720fe6a1965534d57e45….jpg)

>>549513

perhaps it is to say that if guns are actually taken away in addition to targeting unconstitutional LEO, critical infrastructure should conveniently fail over a course of a couple weeks.

Having knowledge of critical infrastructure, military and government installations is obviously critical and that knowledge should not be mitigated by a longterm loss of electricity.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cafechan / lds / leftpol / livecow / rolo / strek / travis2k / zog ]