>>540377
Oh my God. It gets worse the longer I look at it.
If it's supposed to function the way the pistol it was ripping off functions, that slide is too long and won't even be able to slide back to cycle a round because the stock is in the way.
Unless the slide itself is actually attached to stock, in which I'm not sure if that's better or worse. The slide could move, but that means anyone holding the gun tight against their shoulder is actively fighting against the gun's ability to cycle a round. That would also mean that when the gun is fired the rear pistol grip and stock have to get get further apart for the gun to cycle.
The rear sight is attached to what looks like is supposed to be a folding stock, which means it doesn't stay aligned with the barrel of the gun.
The rear sight is just a piece of green glass open and exposed to the air. There's no place for a projection to come out of onto the glass, and even if three was having the glass/plastic/whatever exposed like that means it's susceptible to scratches and breaking and things could get in the way of the projection going onto the glass.
There's an M16 carry handle on top only it's functioning as the front sight instead of the rear sight and it's present even though there is what is supposed to be a holographic sight which shouldn't need a second sight. If the carry handle is a backup sight, then it should have a companion front sight, but it doesn't.
I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and say that the gun ejects at an angle and not straight up, but still, putting an attachment on the gun that goes directly over the ejection port?
The slide has a metal loop on it for attaching a sling or something to.
How the hell is that font grip attached to anything? The material that it could be attached to was drilled out for those trapezoidal holes.
Judging by the size of the grips, either the back grip is too big or the front grip is too small.