[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cure / hentai / int / monarchy / ss / u / vr / yg ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

fa5ce5 No.537763

Would a ballistic missile be able to bust that Three Gorges Dam?

c61d7e No.537774

>>537763

You would have much better luck targeting the useless fuckhueg lock system next to it, dams are very hard to attack from the front.


e343bd No.537776

File: 309ba9bc6bac494⋯.jpg (2.34 MB, 3000x1831, 3000:1831, yellowstone-header.jpg)

>>537763

Seems like an appropriate thread. Could explosives activate pic related?


e343bd No.537777

>>537776

All for theoretical reasons, of course.


76a141 No.537790

>>537774

It wouldn't be extremely easy to do with a missile. These guys did it in WW2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._617_Squadron_RAF


76a141 No.537792

>>537790

It would be easy with a missile is what I meant. Since they were able to do it with bouncing bombs in WW2.


ce7c76 No.537795

>>537763

Yes but the damage would be temporary, near the center of the blast, there would be some flooding, theyd tow a temporary barrier there by boat, and it would be fixed in a few months.

Not even a nuclear missile could permanently hurt that dam. See the concrete above the ground? Rule for dams, as much concrete as there is above the sediment, there's three times as much below ground. That's reinforced, it's not going to get toppled by a nuclear pressure blast, it won't be incinerated by the thermal blast.

Dam construction has improved since WWII, it's fuck hard to do it now. Maybe an older dam built before WWII would be vulnerable.

>>537776

Yes. Any type of fault under stress can be moved by repetitive, and large scale enough vibration.

A continental fault like at california can be moved by drilling channels to the fault layer and placing a string of fifty or so nukes there, then detonating them all at once to separate the fault layers. The separation doesn't have to be total, just enough to reduce the coefficient of friction enough to cause fault movement. Pressure from the nukes would move along the path of least resistance, across the fault slightly separating it, like too-weak fart that moves through your clenched buttocks and pops out. Then the whole "california sinks under the oceans" thing happens.

Yellowstone isn't a continental fault, it's a supervolcano. Basically a giant zit that's too weak to pop, so it just cooks there. BUT it has a set of ring faults surrounding the giant zit. If you drill hundreds of channels around the fault and place explosives there, and then detonate at once, it would cause fault movement. The "roof" or the rock over the caldera to press it down, and squeeze the magma out through the weakest spots.

However you can't use nukes at yellowstone, it's too fragile for that. A nuke could open a smaller channel and let off pressure, then bury the whole thing and maybe even make it safer. Because TNT would have to be used, it would require a LOT more tunnels, hundreds, potentially more.


ec5246 No.537806

>>537792

>>537790

>it would be easy to do because it was easy over 70 years ago

bongs now I understand why you view us as lesser lifeforms


0dd549 No.537860

>>537795

You have thought quite extensively about how to send california into the sea.


741bb7 No.537861

>>537860

Who hasn't?


0dd549 No.537863

>>537861

I can only imagine the amount needed to send my entire country to the bottom.


527413 No.537892

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>537763

Some folks with AKs and Toyotas would be able to do it, no?


ed2890 No.537934

File: 59c626cbc3fac08⋯.jpg (415.31 KB, 980x1598, 490:799, Barnes 'the madman actuall….jpg)

>>537792

1: It was not a regular, easy, thing to do in WW2. It was a flash of mad-science tier genius and autism from one of my favourite figures from the second war.

2: Building a bouncing bomb set up would be difficult for a modern design team - not because the maths would be as tricky as it was when Barnes Wallace was doing it all with a pencil and slide-rule, but because best of luck finding a bomber large enough to carry the bomb and launching gear whilst still being slow enough to deliver the bomb at the correct altitude, range, and airspeed.

3: I'm pretty sure ICBMs come at their targets from above rather than horizontally.

4: Best of luck getting your bombers to the start line when your enemy actually has Radar.

5: If you're planning on just firing cruise missiles at it then remember that you're dealing with a few thousand tonnes of concrete (at least)


d8c0dd No.537973

>>537790

>Guy Gibson also owned a black Labrador named Nigger, who was the mascot of the squadron for some time. Alas, Nigger was killed on the evening of the raid, being run over outside the base.

rip nigger


fa5ce5 No.538228

Why didn't we ever do an above ground MIRV test?


ed2890 No.538238

>>537973

The dogs name was also (badly) dubbed to 'Nigel' in the recent TV release (and I think the US DVD) of the film 'The Dambusters'.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cure / hentai / int / monarchy / ss / u / vr / yg ]