/k/ - Weapons

>50,000 uneducated, WWII tech taliban

>fight a successful campaign

>against 350,000 allied forces with fucking lasers (7:1)

>with no access to allied forces infrastructure

>90,000,000 educated, most modern tech americans

>cant fight a successful campaign

>against 2.5 million armed government employees (1:36)

>with full access to their infrastructure…. and their families

Yeah that sounds retarded.

>>532209

Because you're making them look bad, it actually physically hurts their brain to see someone with more pride and capability than they've got.

The most effective method of controlling slaves is traitors who betray other slaves they feel got "uppity".

>>532208

Because liberals can't into logic.

>>532208

Liberal left mindset is teenage to the core since those people are young according to statistics. It lays on a superficial "common sense" which is no tool for discoveries, it only generates simple answers with disdain for anyone denying them. This picture is a prominent example of such approach - superficial "common sense" simply tells "oy vey look how Gargantuan those war machines are, no way tiny pathetic guns can even try to compete". So a leftist closes his shell on that topic and enjoys confirmation bias. Teenage roots of liberal left culture also lead to the important consequense: disdain is radical and knows no undertones. So, the idea of prepping triggers them not only because they are brainwashed low-test cucks, but also because of a teenage worldview.

>your government has airplanes so don't even pretend you should keep your guns

Tell that to the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

>>532230

>Tell that to the Taliban and Al Qaeda

Why? SJWs supports both

>>532208

>taliban oppress women, destroy historic artifacts, basically live like savages

>liberals support them

>americans just want the right to self defense

>liberals want to exterminate their own country

logic doesn't even enter into it.

"The last thing a tyrannical government wants is several million angry people with guns."

>>532208

The funny about the person who created that image has took the the concept of logistics into consideration..

>>532297

^not

>>532208

Because prepping implies falling back on preparations, which triggers (literally) a fear reaction in them. It's not a logical opposition on any level, it is entirely a fear-based reaction. They're afraid of fighting to live.

>>532208

the last four generations of the ten generation of an empire cycle sees the formation of 4 types among the men

the normals/alphas/conservatives

the pansexuals

the hyperactive raiders

the autists

the four types show aggression towards another

its natural really

>>532306

I think the autists and the alphas will form a bond while slaughtering the other two.

>>532306

What's this "ten generations of an empire cycle"? It sounds interesting.

>>532311

http://www.rexresearch.com/glubb/glubb-empire.pdf

And like always when politics come up, I must urge you to read Decline of the West from Spengler.

>>532257

>inanimate objects don't cause crime

>except drugs

>>532208

>Why do the idea of prepping triggers liberals so much?

Because liberals/progressives are wired to see people differing in ideology as stupid and/or evil.

Somebody who not only disagrees with their politics but also actively prepares for a eventual socio-economic collapse triggers deep seated fears in them.

>>532319

Drugs don't cause crime either. They just alter peoples minds enough so that the people commit the crime. Like getting drunk and voting for a criminal who killed seth rich.

>>532299

I am pretty sure that 100k soldiers armed with AR15s would be much better close support than a Spooky.

>>532299

A few well placed shots every now and again will keep it grounded indefinitely while syphoning enemy's budget.

>>532332

Also with a bit of explosives and electronics you can make improvised heat seeking missiles. If you can make a rocket that can go for half a minute or so at supersonic while carrying a bit of high explosives wrapped in ball bearings, you can upgrade it with homing ability. You gonna need a bunch of narrow angle heat flux sensors, a gyro, 3 PID controllers and 4 servos to control the fins. You arrange heat flux sensors in a flower configuration, connect the opposite ones in counterflow fashion so that together they produce one differential output. Wire horizontal output to the first PID controller and vertical to second, and attach a gyro to the third. Output of the vertical PID controller connects to horizontal fins servos, horizontal PID connects to vertical fins, and gyro connects to all of them. Then you just dick around with the PID controllers until they counteract roll and move fins towards heat sources. Now add some sort of fuse (distance sensor) and congrats, you've got a homing missile. Key feature is being very cheap and moderately effective, so in a workshop with militia funding you can make dozens of them and harrass enemy aviation to no end.

>>532335

>>532338

Witnessed

Do you have an occipital bun?

>>532321

But that sounds childish

Here's a question I've had for a while: why do leftists say that liking guns means you have a small dick?

I've seen it all over the place. Like going shooting with friends? Lol, you must have a small dick. Want to ensure your family's safety against home invasions and muggings? Lol, you must have a small dick. Have any desire to be self-sufficient and not crawl to the government for assistance after the next hurricane/tornado/economic downturn? Lol, you must have a small dick.

It's like these people simply cannot conceive of any reason to do anything that doesn't revolve around compensating for some inadequacy. The thought of protecting your family or being prepared for future events just isn't something they're capable of comprehending.

>>532343

>muh dik

Considering leftists' mental abilities, you shouldn't be surprised.

>>532344

I just can't imagine the thought process behind it, and want to figure it out so I can at least understand what makes them think the way they do.

And now that I think about it, it's not just guns that get the "muh dik" treatment. I have a friend that likes offroading and has a kitted out jeep, and when we drove through a left-leaning area he got a snarky comment from some soyboy about how he must be "compensating for something." I've heard leftists talk about how people that own private planes or yachts only do so because they've got tiny dicks. I read a comment on some Huffington Post article about how people who like camping only like it because they are compensating for their small dicks by acting "traditionally masculine."

Maybe I'm just ignorant of all the ten inch donkey-dicked numales that congregate at the local Starbucks and brag about how uninterested they are in any kind of hobby, recreational activity, or sport over their soy lattes and tofu bowls, but it seems to me like these people think that having any kind of interest means you have a "small dick." And I can't for the life of me figure out why they think that way.

>>532343

Same goes for liking big luxurious cars, they can't come up with a better insult, bunch of leftists started saying it and it stuck. Don't think about it too much because they don't think about it either

>>532341

But it isn't. I think it was Haidt who wrote about experiments showing people on the progressive part of the political spectrum being being literally unable to identify the premises of reasoning of their opponents, instead being prone to erect strawmen ("I'm a Nationalist therefore I value a homogenous country" vs. "hurr durr I haet brown ppl").

I'm deeply convinced there's something about modern society that has turned a significant part of the population into Dodos without proper threat assesment.

>>532349

>>532354

Luxury cars are bad unless they good because they allow virtue and status signalling (hybrids, electrics). Also, snark covers envy.

>>532349

>I can't for the life of me figure out why they think that way.

Because they don't have any interest.

They have a yawning hole where their life should be. When they see someone enjoying their existence, the soy boy's got three options:

1. Attack the fun haver for daring to have fun

2. Rationalize a failure to have fun

3. Sudoku

>>532398

How does one just not have any interests though? You've got to have something to make time go by, even if it's something really esoteric like model trains or programming or shitposting on a Burmese shadow puppetry forum. How do soyboys get through life with no interests or hobbies? If I couldn't find any interesting hobbies to do in my free time, I'd blow my brains out.

>>532403

Virtue signalling is pretty much just the soyboy equivalent of shitposting.

That and starbucks is what they attempt to fill that gaping hole in their souls with.

>>532406

>>532403

Just look at most normal fags. Their idea of fun is watching sports, watching TV, watching movies, watching more TV but on the internet, and goybook. You just replace the normal fag entertainment with the more token darkie filled shit to attract nu-males and there you have it.

Also notice how it's all just passive and safe mom approved entertainment/hobby that does not require or increase ones skills and understanding in something. It really shouldn't come as a surprise that dependent leeches and weak sheep are content with playing in the ball pit and being told around like they were still children, while non-retards tend to go for something that requires actual activity whether it be mental or physical. I'm not trying to come off as AUTISM PRIDE or elitist cock-waving but there's something to be said when the most common discussions happening around the water cooler is almost always about WATCHING something

>>532403

Postmodern nihilists (PMN) don't believe in value, so they can't value one thing over another. If nothing is superior over anything else, it's hard to pick anything to do any given day, it's hard to get up in the morning, even live their life.

Alpha class PMN are frozen into place, the only way they survive is when their bodies autonomic system gives them a dash of pain to force them to eat. That's why they're all thin as fuck.

Class beta are the fat ones, the hedonists, which is the other answer to nihilism. If nothing matters, then might as well do anything you want, which devolves into addiction, drug use, fatness…

Class gamma are the healthiest and most dangerous, the hangers on. They pick any motivated group they see and follow them around, doing whatever they're told. Since they don't have a value structure of their own, they parasitize that of other people… it works, keeps them healthy. Gammas are usually recruited by religious groups and far left groups because these actually have seminars on "outreach" and who to target. However I've seen a few gamma class PMNs in right wing groups and even gamer clubs.

Delta class PMNs substitute their own lack of value structure for what they consider "nature", which (because they're lazy and unfocused) is usually based on Disney conception of nature. These are the cat ladies and various tree nuts.

It's possible for one person to belong to multiple classes in various degrees. All classes also tend to have a death wish, because they see it as the only way out of a world where nothing matters. The brave ones suicide, the cowards do ever stupider things hoping an accident will happen and piss off people hopping someone will put an end to them.

>>532360

>I'm deeply convinced there's something about modern society that has turned a significant part of the population into Dodos without proper threat assesment.

It's just urban living. You share personal space with ten thousand strangers you've never met, never even seen before, and will never see again. Anyone with a functioning sense of threat finds that unbearable. I'm pretty sure it's adaptive rather than evolutionary because city birthrates are almost always negative, so urban-favoring genetics shouldn't actually be beneficial.

>>532343

Probably has to do with how many of them were sexually abused/molested as children (thus being permanent children themselves, they're locked in until something forces them to grow up).

It is basically a guarantee that if someone uses that kind of insult frequently, they're self-conscious about their own package. Not to say there aren't times where it is clear compensation (people that drive sports cars like assholes being a good example), but if they say it all the time, odds are they don't like what they see in the mirror.

>>532434

>and equal treatment under the law

People are not equal, why should they be treated as equals by the law?

Egalitarianism was always an abomination to the one true law, the natural law.

>>532299

The comparison is illogical and on more than one level; it doesn't consider legal, logistical, strategic, or tactical implications. It's simply a linear comparison of size and firepower, without the considerations of reality.

>>532343

It's a mix of projection and sexual obsession on a Freudian-level. They feel inadequate, both sexually and physically, thus they project that onto those they hate. However they're also infatuated with sex, particularly pedophilia and homosexuality. They love to call their opposition "faggot" or "child rapist" (which is ironic because they blindly support both), but it's not just a passing commentary, it's constant, repetitive, and consistent in their verbal and textual diatribes. I've also noticed their insults and pejoratives are extremely disjointed and erratic in their illogical retorts, spewing nonsense like this;

> "Nobody is crying except your dad when he realized he raised a cock sucking pansy ass faggot bitch retard".

That kind of response is something one would expect from a twelve year old, not an individual in their 30's.

>>532470

If you read it in an Indian accent you can easily imagine a middle aged man saying it.

>>532471

Are you a creationist or something?

>>532434

Liberalism = liberty and equality.

Liberty = no restrictions on behavior, complete moral nihilism.

Equality = equality of outcome, everyone must be the same or dead.

Do you not see how that's deconstructionist? No civilization can survive liberalism because liberalism strives to equate everyone to everyone else (smash all hierarchy) and remove all morality and value systems. This means the civilization has to become less and less complex to satisfy liberals endless craving for liberty and equality. End result is always the supreme simplicity of being free to starve to death in a ditch, and equal to all others in that freedom.

All life is a game, a game that is stamped right onto our fucking cortex. The liberals say we should throw out the rules and everyone gets a trophy - conservatives say we need to preserve rules and only those worthy get trophies. Which game do you want to play?

Grow the fuck up, liberalism is a retarded rousseaouian idea that needs to die.

>>532208

The military consistently votes right-wing. It would be counter-productive for a right-wing revolution to engage the military because regardless of who wins you get a bunch of dead right-wing voters on both sides and the left sits back and watches Republicans kill each other. If there were a revolution from the right it wouldn't be the revolutionaries against the military, it would be the revolutionaries going door to door slaughtering unarmed leftists. I think on some level they know this and their only weapon is ridicule.

>>532477

Weren't atheists supposed to be the rational ones? What do I owe this terribly emotional response to?

>>532457

There is no reason some people should be punished harsher than others for the same crime.

>>532501

Equality is equal opportunity. Equal outcome is social justice.

>>532510

Going by that logic, any right-wing revolution is bound to have huge support with the military, leaving the government crippled and revolutionaries heavily boosted.

>>532512

m8 by now you should be well aware that your typical atheist is religious nut sign minus. Actually rational people don't take religion topics seriously at all.

>>532526

>Equality is equal opportunity.

Except this is stated nowhere, made clear NOWHERE in entire history of liberal philosophy. Ergo people assume equality of outcome, because outcome is the only thing that can be measured.

Besides sane people understand that even equal opportunity is pants on head retarded. Someone born in a good family is going to have better opportunities than someone born to incompetent parents. Therefore the only way to equalize opportunity is have everyone raised by the state.

Retarded.

Equality is sameness, we're only the same in death, if you seek equality you will achieve only death.

>>532528

>Actually rational people don't take religion topics seriously at all.

[Scholastics audibly laughing]

>>532501

>Equality = equality of outcome, everyone must be the same or dead.

Equal application of law =/= equality of outcome. Classical liberalism or libertarianism advocates personal freedom and meritocracy.

The democrats hijacked the term and twisted it into meaning equality of outcome by just repeating their misrepresentations over and over until people stopped arguing with them.

I get where you're coming from but the way I see it, if all anyone is interested in is getting power for themselves and their tribe then we end up with a system where it's normal for the in-power group to mistreat the out-power group(s) and we end up with an ossified one-party state that's more concerned with ideological purity than a functioning society.

Liberty in terms of libertarians and ancaps means following non aggression principle, itself derived from the principle of self ownership. If you do not own yourself, your actions, your labour and your resulting property, who does?

The inherent morality that springs from this is naturally conservative; if you choose to be a degenerate, you may do so, but don't expect others to take you seriously nor trade with you for very long. Ultimately, this alternative is considered preferable to massive public wastes such as the drug war, or BATFE. If you choose to break NAP, you will get riddled with bullets VERY quickly, cops only being there to sweep up the remaining bits of your body into a dustbin after sorting it from the lead.

Liberty is not moral nihilism; it is the complete opposite. It is the recognition that no man may start force, that every man has a right to his life and property, and may defend with lethal force if any of this is threatened. Denying these principles means you want to impose on him your illogical, twisted version of this.

>>532457

>Legend of the Gigantic Queeros

wew

>>532649

>Nobody may take power, therefore someone will

>How will libertarians provide national defense

Two questions with similar answers and roots.

Besides the very obvious threat of communities putting a lot of bullets into the invader, nothing stops you from hiring defense contractors to protect your land, and indeed minarchism allows for the government to be strictly limited to police, military and courts.

Much like any system, armed populations make it very very hard for a government to violently oppress them- the US had to play the long game of federal reserve dickery in order to strip the people of their financial teeth to amass a huge military.

The first and last goal of governments is to protect rights of life, liberty and property, therefore very little power at all needs to be concentrated within it apart from objectively defined rules- a set of things not that the government cannot do, but what it can actually do at all. Anything falling outside of the scope of said rules should mean that person is immediately ousted from their job, with force if necessary.

Since I know who you are, I will answer a question you asked earlier, too.

>What is the point for liberty if all communities function better when they are homogenous and share values, and fractious if they are not

This is precisely the point of liberty- that since a community does not always work in lockstep, it requires a presumption of innocence and equality under law in order to work harmoniously, else you get blacks lynched for the crime of being black and no other crime (were they under no rule of law) or the courts being turned into a political weapon ala to kill a mockingbird. I do not believe for a second the lack of organized society prevents freedoms and on a personal note think Hobbes was a fucking idiot as you are still free to associate, trade and speak your mind, but do agree that courtship allows cooling of tensions and a mediation process in a society that voluntarily pays for it.

>>532649

>most powerful and free nation in history formed as libertarian

>libertariansm saw the rise of the industrial revolution and greatest technological and scientific progress in human history

>"lol libertarianism can't work"

honorary maple nigger.

>>532659

>>532661

One of the big ironies about truely authoritarian society is that the moment you step out of vogue, you will get gulagged. Natsocs benefit from libertarianism in being free to practise their ideals, but do not benefit from their own society actually being implemented!

mercantilism > (((libertarianism)))

tbh

>>532665

>Can't stop me from expanding my power

We can by pointing out the veritable shipload of bullshit fash is, alongside austrian econ and education of rights; total trade bans are not off the table in hoppean communities, and Rand points out it is not a violation of human rights to decapitate a government in first strike if it is in our self interest and violates human rights.

Trust me, ancaps and libertarians are chill peoples, but please don't piss us off.

>>532665

Also, large land owners do not necessarily constitute a monarchy, as monarchy requires enforcement to keep your people from switching sides.

You require shame and delusion to enforce your ideals. I merely require a moral and productive man.

>>532676

Try not to group me specifically with the rest of the dirty commies that live here.

>>532678

So what have you as an INDIVIDUALIST individual have individually done to prevent the islamic gommunists' gun grabbing?

How much more bitching and whining about MUH RIGHTS and shying away from authorities will it take until you realize that your ideology has failed at all fronts and only collective action based on human's imprinted social instincts and strong authority figures, not whinny jewish literal cunts that dies on disability welfare, can unfuck your shit?

>>532683

>Give up your principles and logic, join us robots goy

Piss off.

>So what have YOU done ehhh

Without incriminating myself, the biggest damage an individual can do is refuse to pay the state in any means possible, and getting others to follow suit.

Research agorism.

>>532665

>As a fascist

As a lowercase libertarian, I'm OK with killing actual fascists/"anti-fascists" and communists because each group will eventually lead to an attempted authoritarian takeover. So long that the killing is done by vigilantes/non-government groups that disban after the threat is over.

>>532626

>Equal application of law

I'm sorry but A) this isn't a good thing (because again people aren't equal enough to be treated the same way by the legal system) and B) this wasn't the cornerstone of liberalism until 21st century when the flaws of liberalism were pointed out and some intellectual cowards decided to resurrect the idea of classical liberalism instead of abandoning the concept. Classical liberalism is just as corrupt at its core - it assumes each person is a perfectly isolated individual ergo all morality and value systems collapse into infinite interpretations, but it also assumes each perfect individual can be treated the same by one body of law. Mutually contradictory principles.

>ossified one-party state that's more concerned with ideological purity than a functioning society

Ideological purity IS a functioning society. The oldest liberal nation is the United States, which has a legislature around 200 years old.

The Egyptian state existed for 3000 years because their state was based on a unified system of beliefs, an ideological purity that's impossible to replicate today. The only reason the Egyptian state collapsed is because the ruling members bloodlines broke down from inbreeding, their state was literally as successful as a human genetic code can manage it.

That being said ideological purity must leave a self-edit clause in there, to be activated only every few centuries and prevent stagnation at the top.

Liberalism was some marginal use to get us out of feudalism, but the end conclusion of liberalism was always the dual insanity of population-replacement or gulags.

>>532629

>If you do not own yourself, your actions, your labour and your resulting property, who does?

You own yourself. But "you" is a concept that's edited by the people around you. Isolate your perfect individual and put him on a deserted island with all his things, see what happens to his psyche in a few decades.

>if you choose to be a degenerate, you may do so

Then everyone will choose to be a degenerate, there will be no "others" to stand resolutely apart. Humans need to be constrained by the group, we evolved for this, if we aren't constrained we self destruct. Like a lone penguin walking into the cold until he drops and dies.

>>532658

>nothing stops you from hiring defense contractors to protect your land

Except the fact that an organized enemy state can always pay the contractors more than a disorganized individualist rabble. Also where are these contractors coming from? What will you do if the time between wars is too long, and defense contractors have to close shop?

>minarchism allows for the government to be strictly limited to police, military and courts.

We have an example of this in observable reality. America used to have a <5% flat income tax to run military and courts the police were "contractors" like pinkertons. It took a century or so for that ideal to be turned into the Big Brother despotic hellhole it is now. Quit telling me how great this system is and solve the inherent fucking problems we observed happening in the last few centuries.

>The first and last goal of governments is to protect rights of life, liberty and property

You're ruining a gay mans right to liberty by calling him a faggot, which causes hm mental anguish, off to the gulag with you.

>>532663

You're acting like the only fucking options are the things we've already tried before. National socialism, Capitalism, Marxism, Libertarianism…. these aren't the only options. Be original, make a damn effort to understand how people work.

>>532672

>You require shame and delusion to enforce your ideals. I merely require a moral and productive man.

AND WHICH OF YOU IS ASKING THE IMPOSSIBLE OF HUMANITY?!

This is fucking stupid I'm tired of arguing with intellectual insects.

>>532689

>>Give up your logic, join us robots goy

>denying reality is logic

M'kay, my dude.

>>Give up your principles

>(((lolbergs)))

>making an ideology out of pathological egotism and cutthroat opportunism

>principles

HAHAHAHA! Oh wow…

> I'm OK with killing actual fascists

gorilla_warfare.txt

>As a lowercase libertarian "anti-fascists" and communists

Then why don't you?>>532689

>>532663

> Natsocs benefit from libertarianism in being free to practise their ideals, but do not benefit from their own society actually being implemented!

Delicious irony this coming from a guy that tries to virtue signal to a marxist regime by claiming his guns are for shooting gnatzees.

Good goyim! Argue about petty ideologies and divide yourselves while we use our billions of dollars churning out more and more antigun propaganda!

>>532713

Hey, we are not the ones doing mental aerobatics about how hypothetically our ideology could work if we were to erase six gorillion factors of the human psyche that lead to myriads historical occurrences while threatening the other side with "preemptive" violence because the NAP allows to kill someone that disagrees with your solipsistic point of view.

libertarianism leads to rooty-tooties

rooty-tooties lead to fear

fear leads to authoritarianism

authoritarianism leads to gun control

gun control leads to class conflict slavery

slavery leads to rebellion

rebellion leads to liberation

liberation leads to libertarianism

wow it's almost like there isn't much choice except to move or attempt to predict the future using the past

>>532671

Do you pay taxes? You are essentially protecting a PDA to protect you from other PDAs. THat's what you faggots don't realize. The world on a global level is ancap. The governments you see today are outgrowths of those PDAs that you hire.

>We can by pointing out the veritable shitload of bullshit fash is

Well, if it builds a strong society that out competes its competitors in a free market environment, there is nothing that can be done about it without violating the NAP. Just like people pay to live in a good part of town, people will pay taxes/rent to live closer to a prosperous group of people. Most people don't want to live innawoods forever on subsistence level production. They want a better future for their children. This is a show that has played out numerous times throughout history. Early kingdoms where essentially prosperous trade cities that all payed tax to a monarch. The monarch in return provided them protection and basic civil services. I'm not forcing people to live on my land, they choose to do so voluntarily because my society is prosperous. The results will speak for themselves and bitching from the retarded mountainmen won't change this. You need to remember that the majority of human civilizations were structured under monarchs. Its foolish to think it can't be done again just like it was done 2000 years ago.

>but please don't piss us off.

But I'm not faggot. I'm out competing you in a free market. You don't have to live in my kingdom, you can stay innawoods living out a basic existence.

>>532694

>As a lowercase libertarian, I'm OK with killing actual fascists/"anti-fascists" and communists because each group will eventually lead to an attempted authoritarian takeover. So long that the killing is done by vigilantes/non-government groups that disban after the threat is over.

Two problems with that faggot. I'm not forcing people to live on my land. All I'm doing is collecting rent and providing civil services. The rules in my kingdom are strict but they lead to a very prosperous society. That will attract more people to live there. You and your band of retards would essentially be thieves/terrorists trying to disrupt honest people living out their lives.

>>532703

All of this

>>532672

>Also, large land owners do not necessarily constitute a monarchy, as monarchy requires enforcement to keep your people from switching sides.

Ownership is passed along bloodlines. Power is passed along bloodlines. Sounds like a monarchy to me. Also monarchies don't need enforcement to keep people from leaving. People left kingdoms all the time to live elsewhere. They attract people by being stable and prosperous.

>I merely require a moral and productive man.

Most people are neither productive nor moral.

>>532729

A fix for the first part:

<You are essentially paying a PDA

>>532528

>Actually rational people don't take religion topics seriously at all

I disagree, they're an invaluable asset when studying history and culture - and a useful entry point when you're trying to understand people.

>>532527

The soldiers themselves support the right in the voting booths but they still follow orders of whoever is in charge.

>>532734

This. Its more important to wreck the governments ability to tax and supply basic services, like water, telecom and power. This may require localized killings of LE and .mil, but that should be minimized as much as can be helped. Everything should revolve around shaking people's faith in the government.

>>532208

I read this backwards in terms of numbers and it spelt 1488. nojoke.

>>532208

>Why do the idea of prepping triggers liberals so much?

Because they're overgrown toddlers. They're self-destructive wretches. They're utterly incapable of taking care of themselves or facing any adversity, hence why they shill for Socialism and other cancerous ideologies. They want Big Daddy State to take care of their every need and live in a safe space. This is why they hate preppers or anyone who isn't a self-absorbed leech. On some deep subconscious level they're aware of their faults, and seeing someone who is strong and self-reliant angers and scares them.

>>532741

>>532739

What's going on here?

>>532930

Of course there are watch lists, and of course we are on them.

Kind of going on a tangent but one of the things that made me more anti-government was how third world dirtbags can keep arms under their homes and Mockingbird cries "waaah they are using children as shields!" but BATFags put a god damn daycare in their HQ and somehow it is Micky's fault

>>532935

holy shit

>>532299

I'd disagree. The financial equivalent of 200,000,000$ in ARs arms quite a few revolutionaries.

>>532930

>Are there any actual lists?

Oh yes, there are list, and congratulations - just visiting somewhere like 8chan puts you on at least one of them (I hope you weren't planning on applying for jobs with your nations government or security forces, shit they've probably got you blacklisted for the police and any military post beyond low-tier doorkicking).

I would like to take this opportunity to talk directly to the GCHQ agent reading this post. Hi, how are things? I hope that looking through my porn history isn't too weird for you, and that you're doing relatively well in whatever office betting pool you guys are running to distract you from the Dystopian nightmare you are employed to create and maintain. Do you have kids? Are you planning on telling them about how you keep them safe by violating the civil liberties of eccentric weirdos who enjoy shittalking and posting odd injokes but who pose no threat other than maybe upsetting a few delicate little snowflakes in a social situation? How do you picture that conversation going? If you want to chat you know my email address. /pathetic-passive-aggressive-rant

>>533088

I remember something like that happening when I wanted to watch a playlist of copyrighted videos. I watched one and pretty much all of them after that one got deleted. I guess watching a video, especially in certain regions, may flag it for the censorbots. It would probably be computationally inefficient for it to drudge through every random faggot uploading a video that only gets watched once if at all.

>>533093

>That pic

Holy fuck Orwell is rolling in his grave.

>>533109

no it's protest art thing. There's another where someone placed a poster on a train or bus that basically had cutesy chubby characters saying "I will not dissent" and "I will report dissent". Not yet. Soon strelok. If things don't change

I've got a story from this thanksgiving from a relative.

>relative be chinese with decent english in shanghai.

>White 6ft 4 guy who looks pissed as f asking for directions

>No one giving directions cause scared.

>Cousin tries to help. Tells him he needs to carry a lethal weapon stun baton in that area he's heading to.

>Guy gets angry and says "You don't need weapons to protect yourself" and storms off.

>Prob got gangraped by nignogs and Chinese gangsters in that side of shanghai.

Mind you, in China the police solve crimes cause there's a literal fucking "skynet" of cameras everywhere. Maybe it is safe If you pay the gov X amount of dollars goy!

>>533171

Indeed they solve crimes, after the fact.

Prevention is a different thing.

>>532457

People may not ultimately be equal, but why should they be treated differently under the law? Justice is justice, regardless if you're a dumb fucker, a billionaire, a scientist, ect.

>>533468

>unseen prequel comic: her voting for politicians who create disarmament man as a way to remove guns, because she is a woman and votes majority democrap in every election

>>533468

>UK

>in the same panel as a gun

>>532319

>the fucking leaf is defending mind altering drugs

Every time.

>>532349

It's an attack on anything and everything masculine with the express purpose of white genocide.

I always just thought those people prefer to live in the rainbow land of nothing could possibly go wrong because we live in X 1st world country and the government police and "unalienable human rights" will make sure everything is ok because the media says it is etc.

Easier to go on living like a machine, if you never know about the monsters in the shadows.

>>532349

Could also be the media influencing people on what preferred in societybrainless gear like Marco Savio said . They don't need outdoors-men or gun-owners, they need civilized people who have no need for guns and dwell like sheep in the cities slaving away at an office job now.

>>533886

The issue is people believe that there are "unalienable human rights". Inevitably when the US goes down in shit we will see what "human rights" there are when everyone starving/fighting a civil war.

>>533109

The Greater London Authority (Mayors Office) & Metropolitan Police spends more on surveillance & surveillance equipment than MI6 and the CIA (that may have changed, I've not checked the numbers in a while). If we could connect Orwell's corpse to a generator then it would be spinning hard enough to power the majority of the UK.

>>532299

>build a 20mm cannon

>ac-130 is now worthless

Face it anon, this thing would not survive an engagement with well equiped insurgents.

>>532212

your equation excluded at least 50% of "ebil redneck domestic terrorists" actively serving in the army itself, probably more considering rarely anyone conscripts to murder the people he swore to protect.

>>532299

why use AC130 as an example, and not an atomic bomb?

After all, every despot dreams of being master of life and death over an irradiated pile of rubble, and not the people. (^:

>>532321

Liberals also believe, simultaneously that everyone is inherently good, but everything around them is holding them back, society, education, religion, tradition, intolerance, family, culture, literacy, all need to be removed after that everyone will spiral into perfection, because even when you're only a little bit good, you'll realize you need to get better.

Nigs playing knockout game, muds waging jihad, kids torturing animals, rapists and serial killers are all innocent people harmed by the evil society.

>>532434

>They are not liberals, and it's time we stopped letting them get away with stealing that word.

Careful lolberg, that's mighty close to violating your own circular logic!

>>532527

you forgot that even though there are cucks and traitors, they're still your countrymen like in the May Coup in 1925

<evil despot, allowed 100 civilians to die during the coup

>Citizens were literally watching from their windows and balconies, so somebody eventually got hit by a stray bullet

>>532526

>equal opportunity

I'm 2 meters tall, why am i denied an opportunity to serve on a submarine?

>>532649

To be fair, marxism and communism was tried multiple times around the globe, in some places even still functions as designed. Labor and concentration camps are the pinnacle of equality

>>532666

Leaf Satan has the right idea.

Reminder that final goal of capitalism is having a private monopoly, with McGulag and serfdom under Burger King, as opposed to Concentration Camp and government-owned farmland

>>538175

>AC130 would not survive an engagement with well equiped insurgents.

Why have these insurgents not covered the AC130s airbase in mortar rounds and maybe set off a few cratering charges on the runway?

Statists will always support the state and hate individuals. That's a given. Their moral fucking ontology requires it.

>>538194

>muh individualism

I bet you think a single person is the smallest unit for lawmaking, and not the family.

>>538197

>implying I'm an individualist

>implying it's even coherent to say a family is more fundamental than an individual

>implying that statism based on any 'unit' regardless of how 'fundamental' it is can ever be coherent

>implying I accept the burden of proof for any lawmaking system without a complete moral and ethical ontology in place

wew

>>538200

Individual doesn't express all the elements of a civilization on a micro-scale, family does.

>>538201

>another bald assertion without so much as a definition of terms

You've not made an argument and not adressed any of the things I've said.

You already strawmanned me as an individualist and apparantly made even more assumptions about my political positions when I simply pointed out that statists can't believe in things like the individual right to bear arms.

You have done nothing but set up more things you have to prove and made no progress toward doing so, nor would this be a place for an essay on some obscure socio-political legal system treatie even if I thought you could.

>>538202

well, since you're not an individualist we don't need to argue; do you still desire a definition of a family, civilization and what elements constitute civilization?

>>538187

that pic is crap

>>532335

>Then you just dick around with the PID controllers until they counteract roll and move fins towards heat sources.

And how do you plan on doing this without resorting to repeated test flights and recoveries?

>>538303

no u

>>532403

These people are the future of consumerism, they spend their time watching """"""high quality""""" series and movies like stranger cucks and whatever bullshit marvel puts out and they think this actually makes them intellectually superior because "muh deep plots and complex story lines" even though this shit is nothing more than a well thought out cash grab by the (((entertainment industry)))

I sometimes read shit on Cracked.com to cringe, the other day i saw this article claiming that TV has become a form of art that should be recognised and respected as such, that's how far these people's heads are stuck up their arses.

>>538317

>>532335

Furthermore, if you're launching a plurality of these things in battery, how do you ensure they track the target instead of each other's rocket motors?

>>538175

Setting aside for a moment the question of how, exactly, an AC-130 could be employed against a dispersed population of civilian gun owners:

>Assume a totalitarian takeover of the .mil.

>Interdict logistics from civilian sector to military through hit and run, hijacking and other guerilla tactics.

>AC-130 sits on runway without fuel, spare parts, maintenance.

>Pilots, air and ground crews compromised due to lack of food and civilian workers at commissary, lack of medical care for families, lack of heat in housing.

>Assassinations and death threats make collaboration of any form with remains of military and government too risky.

>.mil is looted down to the last stale MRE by deserters and is combat ineffective in a matter of months.

>But muh Battle of Berlin! The military will follow orders and fight to the end!

The reason Germany held out as long as it did had far less to do with loyalty to the government as terror over the advancing Red Army. Civilian production of war materiel in many cases kept up to the last possible moment.

>>532434

Liberalism is the belief that limitations on one's autonomy is evil. There is no "nice" or "good" liberalism because all liberalism eventually leads to this. Morals are just one of the many limitations on your autonomy and thus something to be destroyed. Biology is another.

>>532343

People who use that argument think they’re triggering some kind of feeling of inadequacy in you, which is really a large display of projection on their end.

Biggest thing liberals miss is the sheer number of veterans that can operate the "invincible war machines" and known understand its vulnerabilities and they also over estimate the number of troops that'd just follow order.

>>540358

We got a former tank mechanic at work. Dude retired a few years after learning how to work on the first gen Abrams. I know a nam Wild Weasel pilot that could probably get a Cessna to /k/'s standards. A few F-15 pilots and a couple of Viper boys. Ooodles of ground pounders, the few mortar men and sappers. And a bout a 6x6 load of SF boys.

I don't think any of them would willingly let the .gov take their shit away.

>>538183

Better yet why didn't they just attack the base's fuel shipments and nullify every machine the base has?

Whenever someone brings up the bullshit in OP's picture I mention how they're absolutely right and private citizens should be able to own and operate gunships/armor/warships in order to even the odds.