>>530998
What is this video game shit? Even a shitty /pol/ poster used to have the sense to give a passing justification for his scenarios. Did the wargame he bought from Barnes & Noble say that attack aircraft get to kill 2 tanks before getting shot down?
Even the first article I found on Austria's Air Force (http://archive.is/TxNMR) brings up more questions. Austria's Typhoons can evidently be loaded with GBU-16's, why can't they participate in this 2-for-1 rule? Moreover, why doesn't the fact that Austria, as of 2014, only has 12 pilots for their 15 Typhoons come into play, not to mention the fact that they have no night flying hours and don't perform quick-reaction exercises (which I have to assume factors in to the nebulous claim that "defending aircraft would be more effective".)
Also he didn't explain why all of the countries in those "ally scenarios" would disregard Article 5, probably because he doesn't know what Article 5 is, because he's a faggot underage b&. I hope he got relentlessly mocked in that thread.