/k/ - Weapons

Its the jews

YouTube is well on their way to MySpace-ing themselves.

>>512818

You can go full on accelerationist and abuse the fuck out of the system so it collapses quicker and a new, better one would rise from the ashes.

The king is dead! All hail full30!

>>512835

The "content creators" are getting tired of jewgle's shit, all we need is for an alternative to catch on with this group. The greater danger is abuse in the system to force a centralization onto controlled/censored platforms only. We already know most governments would support monopolization if it meant quieting dissidents.

>people use jewtube instead of hosting webm embeds on their own websites

Full30 is great, but they have some glaring software issues (the ends getting cut off of longer videos, for one) that the site owners are seemingly uninterested in fixing. Gee, doesn't that sound familiar.

>>512950

(((content))) creators

I assume everyone realizes that this is a loaded term designed to prime the listener into thinking that media is a thing, by nature, that must be restricted and controlled.

We need to come up with a better term. Preferably something implying value and quality. Any ideas?

>>512818

duh ebil jooz

BitCHUTE

One click and your whole account, thousands of videos, transfer over automatically.

>>512984

You dont need icann idiot, just spread your websites DIRECT IP ADDRESS and it cuts out icann entirely.

>>512986

Full 30 is funny in a way- if you download some of the videos from their stream host, it's nearly 3-4gb in size for some 30 minute video!

Getting around this means into their page source code, finding the .mp4 (ctrl-f) copypaste link, and changing 640x480 to 1280x720. Same quality, but files are now at a manageable 100 meg per file.

What the fuck is going on that the backend is inflating file sizes by 30 times?

>>512838

This.

>>512838

Go on…

>>512818

> political wrong-think channels

>now it seems they're going to go for historical and weapons related channels as well

those are the same thing, dummy, and they've BEEN going after weapons related channels for awhile now.

>I'm concerned that we may lose the ability to draw more people into the weapon and history communities

again, that is the entire purpose of this endeavor

>Please be respectful

fuck you

>duh ebil jooz

are you a lolberg or something?

>>512950

the content creators have been getting shafted by youtube since2014, but no alternative has caught on yet, nor have any of them left.

>>513034

elaborate

>>513035

>give out direct IP

>oops looks like the wrong people found it time to ddos

Think for a moment, alien.

>>514528

I'm no network expert, but I thought you could find the direct IP of a site from its URL.

>>514528

ddos only works if ip isnt backed up by a massive billion user cloud providing bandwidth.

>>514528

holy fuck you are retarded

I seen Linus tech tips place Pepe in their videos a few times.

We need to push IPFS. "if the alt right is using this platform, then I finally have a platform that won't fuck with the

monetization of my videos."

Demolition ranch vet channel has censorship problems, as well as this mouse trap channel, and one other that I can't remember.

>>512986

>full30

They need a bit more of an ass ramming from the community though. They have a pretty gay policy on offensive language like cussing and ideas on what is or is not related to shooting sports. Which made some lesser known gun channels have a bitch of a time to get on while the more prominent ones with retards cussing every now and then in their videos or with half of the videos they upload having little to do with guns at all, get on to the site with no problem. Of course it mostly boils down to advertisers and what they deem appropriate. read as: Is this nigger famous? If yes get on now! (Larry "ayy yo hol up lemme eat these 40 snickers" Vickers or scootch). Is he a literally who in the eyes of advertisers? If yes. "Well you see we reviewed your content and believe it related very little to shooting sports or the second amendment if at all"

>>513035

>>514528

You're both retarded as hell.

You can get any IP address, but most websites require the URL in the request header. Because IPv4 is pretty much full, you can shuffle traffic around by header and host multiple sites on a single IP, even on a single server.

If you give out the direct IP, yes, you're in danger of being DDOS'd. Cloudflare and similar work by resolving the URL to their own infra, filtering the traffic, then passing it to the actual server.

If you want to cut out ICANN, use OpenNIC's DNS servers. They support their own TLDs, while maintaining compatibility with ICANN's DNS. A guy from /cyber/ actually did a project to get OpenNIC to add a .chan domain, and there's a push for a .front domain for political sites. Switching over like that decreases reliance on ICANN, but restricts your site to only people using OpenNIC. However, if you're a host, you can still host with multiple domains - just bind both domains, your custom OpenNIC and the one you gave shekels to a registrar for.

>>514528

>being retarded

Try typing this onto a terminal command line fampai:

$traceroute 8ch.net #you can put any other website there too. 

Output:

#[...]
9  104.20.43.57 (104.20.43.57)  27.323 ms  38.791 ms  38.711 ms #<-The ip of h8chan, though it's protected by cloudflare so you can't connect directly

>>515326

And you're ultra-retarded.

>traceroute

>not nslookup

>didn't even bother checking out who the IP belongs to

http://whoisrequest.com/ip/104.20.43.57