/hypno/ - Hypnochan

>trade

wtf

just upload your shit bitch

>>44938

>tradefag that has no problem taking things for free but wants something in return for his free things

theres already I thread about this bump it instead of making a whole new thread

>>44942

tradefags should just be banned on site, it's a retarded outlook for someone to have.

>>44943

Someone has to buy something originally. The users who call people "tradefags" are usually leeches who never have bought ANYTHING.

>>44943

Just giving away files you bought doesn't necessarily encourage others to start buying files and share those. Trading at least solves the free-rider problem.

>>44948

>>44952

>muh free-riders

alot of fancy ways of saying you're a selfish nigger who won't help others find files they need unless they get something in return personally.

>>44964

HEHEHE! YES!

Can't stand these types of creeps. And the excuses they come up with instead of just admitting they are selfish creeps. Share freely if you want to share. It's the right thing to do.

>>44964

>need

Nobody needs hypno files, you economic illiterate. They are just that, luxuries. The vacuous kind of commodities that you think provide a sense of happiness and status, but are really empty and meaningless.

>nigger

I'm not the one here saying GIB ME DATS

>>44970

So, I spend my hard earned money on a hypno file I want, and you call me selfish for not sharing it, despite the fact you never made the same sacrifice yourself and share the file.

>It's the right thing to do.

Moralizing files sharing. Disgusting.

>>44973

What's the difference between want and need? Do you think there would be any point in existence if we were not satisfied with it? I'll leave you to your great life eating/breathing,shitting etc.

So because you made a sacrifice you don't want to be generous because someone else didn't have to suffer. So essentially you want to make sure no one could enjoy something because your bitter you had to pay for it. You pathetic little bitch. Sacrifice? What the fuck are you talking about you little maggot. You did what you wanted to do. I don't consider a purchase a sacrifice.

What's disgusting about suggesting people be generous you little shit? Or to you is it so shameful you might want to try a file before spending money on them? because most of them are garbage with only a few being worth the money. The other thing is, there are plenty of people who plain can't afford these files, so what is the point of them not getting them for free? The person who makes the content is not gonna get the money anyway. So why bother depriving the person who can't afford it? Some kind of punishment? You can't pay, you can't have it. If some rich bastard was not paying for files it would be pathetic, but that's not the case. Of course you wont understand any of this because your a disgusting piece of trash. But I can guarantee that if I produced anything I had copyright over, if I KNEW people couldn't afford it, they could have it for free.

>>45080

Sure you would - because those poor people would not turn around and give it to other people, even potential money-spending customers, would they? Your logic is illogical.

Nobody deserves anything, and if people choose not to violate the sales contract they made when they purchased a file, they have a perfect right to do so. Equally, if they would like to share, then the lucky recipients should say nothing but 'thank you' - not 'Hey, I'm entitled to your stuff'.

If the content-makers get fucked around too badly, they will stop producing the content we all want.

And calling someone a 'pathetic little bitch' probably won't encourage them to share, will it? Others might also take note what an ungrateful little entitled scut you are.

So take your unearned, ridiculous moral self-righteousness and stick it where the sun don't shine.

>>45095

I bet you say "I don't owe you anything" alot don't you? You seem the type. Because a mother doesn't owe her own child anything. She can do what she likes and just abandon it if she chooses. She doesn't have to do anything with it. Ah, but that thing called decency.

And yeah, I would rather miss out on some money than risk depriving someone who may genuinely care about something but can't afford it. At the end of the day, people who are gonna pay are gonna pay, those who are not, wont. In the age of the internet, sales come from people who CHOOSE to pay. You are not gonna encourage anyone to buy anything if they don't want to.

"nobody deserves anything" you say?

HAHA guess the conversation is indeed over. Your a turd.

>>45109

You seem to forget several things:

1. File sharing is illegal when the conditions of sale prohibit it.

2. The relationship of a mother and child is not one of debt, but love. Mutual commitment is implied.

3. The decision to give an item for free to someone rests with the creator, not with the licensee.

4. Nobody is entitled to anything - 'deserves' is not quite the right word.

5. Calling people names and trying to make them feel guilty because they won't let you scrounge off them is hardly admirable.

6. Equating the purchaser with the creator and claiming the former has the same distribution rights as the latter is ludicrous.

I am not against moderate file-sharing, but the entitled guilt-tripping mooching of people like you certainly discourages me from doing so.

I called you a turd first - see 'scut'.

>>45109

>>45080

Hello, >>44973 here. Not only is it clear you have literally zero understanding of economics, it is clear to me you are a child who has never worked a single day in his life. You and your ilk graciously ask graciously ask others to share and leave a token "thanks" when they do, but if anyone even so much says "no," you reveal your true colors and bite the hand that feeds you by lashing out at them. You are never content and thankful for what you already have, and are incapable of appreciating any gifts you receive.

>What's the difference between want and need? Do you think there would be any point in existence if we were not satisfied with it? I'll leave you to your great life eating/breathing,shitting etc.

I mean, these a fleeting desires, which even if fulfilled, is still a fleeting fulfillment. Furthermore, it is not at all important to sustaining your life. You have surrendered yourself to the current of materialism when you can't see the difference between one and the other.

>So because you made a sacrifice you don't want to be generous because someone else didn't have to suffer. So essentially you want to make sure no one could enjoy something because your bitter you had to pay for it. You pathetic little bitch. Sacrifice? What the fuck are you talking about you little maggot. You did what you wanted to do. I don't consider a purchase a sacrifice.

You have completely missed the point in your autistic pedantic rambling. In a world of unlimited desires and limited resources, you have to make choices of forgoing one thing for something else. This is literally Day 1 of Econ 101 here.

>Because a mother doesn't owe her own child anything. She can do what she likes and just abandon it if she chooses. She doesn't have to do anything with it. Ah, but that thing called decency.

Your most intellectually disingenuous argument, by far. A mother's unconditional love of her child and file sharing do not compare and is a false equivalence.

>And yeah, I would rather miss out on some money than risk depriving someone who may genuinely care about something but can't afford it.

For something as frivolous as media? Are you completely fucking bonkers?

>The other thing is, there are plenty of people who plain can't afford these files, so what is the point of them not getting them for free? The person who makes the content is not gonna get the money anyway. So why bother depriving the person who can't afford it? Some kind of punishment?

>At the end of the day, people who are gonna pay are gonna pay, those who are not, wont. In the age of the internet, sales come from people who CHOOSE to pay. You are not gonna encourage anyone to buy anything if they don't want to.

I don't know which is worse and more laughable. Your persistence on defending such an untenable position, or your belief in such pie in the sky nonsense where everybody should have their desires met for free no matter how frivolous, just because they want it. Now, I know for a fact you are literally underageb& who never worked for a wage/salary to enjoy the fruits of his labor and do with it however he pleases.

>>45109

> I would rather miss out on some money than risk depriving someone who may genuinely care about something but can't afford it.

Are you talking about drugs?

>>45574

Well, I do like to suck dick. You're right about that.

PS: this pic is not theirs.

>>47253

If they had a thread here, it will appear in the archive in a few weeks. Somehow this process still takes some time after the thread is dead.

The pictures won't be visible though.

>>47263

Thanks for your reply on this!