>>32598
Seriously?
First, stop trying to chase me around just so you can get your trolling kick in. The only one looking foolish by these petty attacks is yourself.
Second, I repeat that I am not a "shill". Just because someone posts something, which you do not like, it does not make it automatically someone with an agenda.
Third, the last of those posts you linked was not even mine. Nice accusing me for stuff I did not even write. Look elsewhere for the author of 32344. The other posts all were mine, but it had nothing to do with trying to hide my identity. It's called posting on a different computer. I have two and one did not have my name set yet and I forgot to force set it. But, even if I 'had' been trying to hide… what the hell? You never post as anything except anonymous and yet you're trying to attack me based on posts I made while on my other computer? Lame as hell attack.
Fourth, how the hell is your brain so obtuse that you can not understand the difference between trancing to a "play" file and trancing to an abnormal file. The moment a hypnotist creates a file with the intent of tricking people it changes things. SB did everything they could to make hard changes to even unwilling listeners. You can not deny that fact. Regardless, of whether you feel the hypnotist succeeded or not, the fact remains that they attempted to do it. That by default means the files need to be treated differently than ordinary ones. Just because "you" may not mind that risk does NOT mean you speak for everyone. Stop spewing your filth all over the place on these boards. Just because you can't separate your selfishness, from impacting innocent people's lives, it does not make these boards your personal domain.
Fifth, accusations of my grammar sense are always accepted. But only if you actually complied yourself to those guidelines. Furthermore, I fail to see how you can possibly be accusing me of "run-on sentences". Unless your knowledge of grammar is subpar of course. Newsflash… a true "run-on sentence" has no clear definition of ending. It contains multiple sentences without any periods, semicolons, or elipses. At worst you can accuse me of making "overly long sentences" rather than "run-on sentences". Just a grammar hint since you missed the lesson… Those commas around certain groups of words? Those identify extraneous detail information, that qualifies or modifies a sentence, which can be removed and leave a functional sentence behind. See what I just did there? Yeah, that is not a "run-on sentence". I simply prefer giving full information as a writing style preference. Now, accusations regarding my paragraph length would have been accurate. Then again, since nothing else you ever post is accurate, you would not want to set a new precedent of being correct when trolling.