/hypno/ - Hypnochan

I like this. Thank you for this thread, anon.

>>30581

Does anyone has any experiences with Sleepychat? Any decent hypnotists on there?

Also does this thing even support video and audio or is it text only?

>>30600

The problem with Sleepychat and any hypnosis chat platform with usernames is that they're cliquish. The hypnotists quickly come to see themselves as the gatekeepers and refuse to hypnotize anyone outside their clique, so in practice you have to play along with a bunch of dull, sub normalfag-tier conversations before anyone will even consider hypnotizing you.

What we really need is the Omegle of hypnosis, not more IRC servers and chat services.

>>30600

>Does anyone has any experiences with Sleepychat? Any decent hypnotists on there?

Yes. There are some nice people and decent tists there, but it's mostly not worth the time. I don't want to dump a long list of complaints so early on in the thread, but tl;dr >>30604 is pretty right, and there are big privacy/security issues.

>Also does this thing even support video and audio or is it text only?

Last I knew SC was text only, but they might have updated.

wait will people actually converse about something other than wanting to be hypnotized

>tfw when all it normally is is nice hypnotists talking with each other and laughing at begfags who aren't even interesting subjects

>>30617

>will people actually converse about something other than wanting to be hypnotized

I hope so. We could use some real community interaction, and not just endless file dumps.

>>tfw when all it normally is is nice hypnotists talking with each other and laughing at begfags who aren't even interesting subjects

Everyone in this thread so far has been able to form complete sentences, so I think we're safe for now.

>>30617

Many of these "nice hypnotists" let their status get to their heads and don't actually improve at all, like popular furfag artists who stagnate because they have lots of connections and a steady income from wealthy suckers.

Again, we need something like Omegle. No identity bullshit to get in the way, just comfy anonymous hypnosis hypnosis.

>>30633

I'm the guy that made mindwriters.net and so I have a server and a domain that are idling.

If one of you wants to send me code to put on the server I'll happily take care of the hosting.

>>30581

I've had a lot of good experiences on tumblr. I write erotica on there a lot, and when I'm able to I do RP with some people I've met and keep up with there.

Good experiences all, but I do sometimes wish I had them in person so I could more directly enjoy their pleasure.

>>30653

>If one of you wants to send me code to put on the server I'll happily take care of the hosting.

Holy fuck, that's the half that I didn't want to handle. Something like that is a little outside of what and how I normally program, but I'm more than happy to pick up node.js or something if it means having a proper alternative.

>>30655

The server is running a basic apache2 with php7 and mariaDB (mySQL). Make sure it'll work with that.

Also take a look at WebRTC. It's pretty recent but it allows for P2P chat in the browser, which would help keep the server load down and make sure that the server doesn't get access to what is said.

>Get to know a tist in a chat for about half an hour.

>She starts prodding me with suggestions.

>Begin entering trance.

>"Now, I want you to tell me your name."

>"I'm sorry, I don't feel comfortable doing that."

>"Why don't you trust me? >:( "

It drives me crazy that people don't respect pseudonyms anymore. It's like they think they need it for some reason. Can't we just enjoy a shared experience and leave IRL at the door?

>>30686

>Talk with tist on IRC occasionally.

>Get closer with her over time, get tranced by text now and then.

>She posts a link to herself speaking.

>It is very obviously just a man trying to sound feminine.

Fucking Dropped. Why would you not disclose that beforehand? Because you were worried I wouldn't want to participate? Well now I don't want to participate and I resent you. I'm sick of these retards acting like whether or not I'm attracted to them is their call. The irony is not lost on me.

>>32367

Trans woman maybe?

Regardless, escalating from text-only to something with sound or images is unwise for this very reason. Sometimes things are best left unknown.

>>32367

smoker maybe?

>>30617

>aren't even interesting subjects

Very late response, but I'd like to know more about this. I hear tists make this complaint now and then, but they never go into specifics. Considering that the tists are the ones running the show, what exactly are they expecting subs to do to make it "interesting" without interfering with what the tist is doing?

>>33951

I'm not the earlier poster

Anonymity online means that the other person is expected to service your needs. As a subject that means the hypnotist is supposed to be into every fetish you have and immediately hypnotise you to do that thing right away.

The flip side of that is the hypnotist has their own fetishes and rather than just hypnosis probably wants to that. So the findoms will monetize, the hypnofetishists will get out the spirals and pocket watches and any other fetish you're expected to be into it.

Also - you're supposed to be an 18 year old girl that can send them nudes pronto.

>>33951

>>33952

In my experience "interesting" or "responsive" means you'll get them off with stroke story descriptions of how completely aroused you're getting from their amazing powers. Most online tists definitely fall on either side of the cunt extremes, either too arrogant in their own abilities to do anything fun or too desperate for a nut to be of any value.

I've done a lot of text hypnosis from both sides (male) and as far I know, if you want any reasonable chance of getting a good trace online, you either need to be happy with a man (or at least a man pretending to be a woman) or pay. If anyone wants the former, we should make a discord or IRC channel.