/htg/ - Harlot Trainer General

>>37260

>jews act on the jewish plan

>you’re surprised by this

I know as a matter of fact that what you say is correct, but I need proof to spread the word. Things like Patreon response to DarkSilver directly from him would be nice. Doesn't help their patreons are up again.

So start gathering evidence as you can, anon. I'd do it myself but I'm moving so I'm phone posting.

>>37264

Doesn't make it any less right. It's better to do something about it than doing nothing like a faggot.

It's the cucks plan all along.

They'll continue to flag any games with cuckshit and Incest all under the guise of "grr that cuck shit pisses me off that's why I'm reporting it!" when in reality they just want these people to focus on the shit that is legal on Patreon… the cuckshit.

>>37275

>Yes goy! There's nothing wrong with patreon! Is the people that report it who is wrong!

Still butthurt about BIg Brother, I see.

>>37276

No one believes you're not a cuck.

>>37281

I'm sorry your cuck fetish game got taken down :(

>>37284

Keep pretending you're not a cuck. No one believes you.

>>37297

I couldn't give two shits about BB, it was a borefest grind. I'm simply commenting on you "reporting it for incest because it has cuckshit" isn't fooling anyone. You're a cuck who wants to report any game with illegal shit so those makers focus on cuckshit instead.

>>37305

I just want the makers to burn and crash. Without incest, the most popular fetish on patreon right now, it would be easier to boycott and shame cucks. Not like it's already hard, you have to be an idiot to support patreon.

>>37308

No, what you want is more cuck games. That's obvious.

>>37310

I'm not the one crying for a cuck game being taken down, though.

>>37316

No, but you're flagging these games so the developers can only make games with stuff that isn't against Patreon rules… which ends up being cuck games.

You're a cuck pretending not to be, when we all know you're doing this because what you want is more cuck games.

>>37319

Are you mad that the game got taken down for being cuckshit anon? :(

Even if it has a bit of non-blood related incest, it's taken down, Patron is not acting on the flagging system right now, they are probably setting examples. I'm just happy a cuck game was taken down, amd that, at the same time, Patreon is losing popularity in term of porn games.

So the only problem is you, really. If patreon keep producing cuck games, that only means patreon is for cucks only, and that on itself is the best argument thay could came out of all of this.

>>37320

Already said I don't give a shit about BB, I'm calling you out for being a cuck and pretending you're not.

>>37321

Cuck games are being taken down you like it or not anon. It only affects cucks and patrons. It's almost the same thing.

>>37266

And what do you plan to do about it, since you have no control over the site and no power to enact any change?

good, fuck incest, lamest fetish ever

>>37482 (you)

>>37358

But they're not being taken down for being cuck games, they're being taken down because of incest. These faggots will instead focus on the shit that isn't illegal… cuckshit. Which is what cuck faggots like yourself want. You're only playing the "I hate cuck games so I'm reporting it" when you're a cuck who just wants more cuck games.

>>37495

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rediscovering-love/201709/how-infidelity-causes-post-traumatic-stress-disorder

originally I thought he was a closet case but now my theory is he is suffering from the above, wait what if it's both. He was cucked, ashamed and humiliated, but he liked it and can't come to terms with it

>>37498

Nice ad hominem, faggot, on top of your virtue signalling.

>>37504

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]

Your argument was not attacked, just you, faggot

>>37506

>Your argument was not attacked, just you, faggot

That's literally ad hominem, retard.

>>37506

Supplying evidence that opponent is right and then denying it. That's new lol

>>37500

It's a fetish that has proven to get people to patreon for. Lots of games have started adding cuckshit, because cucks are willing to pay for their fetish.

>>37509

No ad hominem would be "Your argument is wrong because you're a cuck" where as he's not bringing up your argument at all, he's simply calling you a cuck.

>>37509

>>37512

see

>>37514

someone with an IQ not in single digits has appeared

>>37513

NO it's a conspiracy pushed by devs and cucks for which I have no evidence for and if you disagree your a cuck, you laugh but ask them

>>37266

>still thinking the jews should do "right" because "muh unfair"

holy fuck neck yourself you ignorant whiny faggot

>>37513

>It's a fetish that has proven to get people to patreon for.

So is incest, even more so

>>37516

Your argument is reduced, to "You are happy of cuck games being taken down because you are a cuck", when that logic is not only retarded, is ad hominem.

>>37517

this tbh. do you thing BLACKED porn is so prevalent because it's popular? non, mon ami!–c'est because the jews subsidize this category of pornography. i expect cuckoldry, which even normalfags would find repulsive and abhorrent, to be so commonly found in crowdfunded porn for the exact same reason

THE JEWS

>>37521

Except Incest isn't allowed anymore.

>>37523

Any argument as to why YOU would want someone thing to be done needs to personal, it speaks to your motive, it's a valid answer not an insult meant to dismiss or deflect your argument, you may be a cuck

>>37525

Because kike devs still use patreon. Patreon isn't the only crowdfunding site in existence.

>b-but it's trustworthy

So trustworthy they can fuck you over as they did with the Big Brother and Blue Balled by my Daughter dev.

>>37527

>Blacked isn't and have never been popular, retard. It's quite literally a question of pumping money on it.

exactly my point though ? maybe it is you that is the retard! neither cuckoldry nor BLACKED a form of cuckoldry are popular and the only reason you see so much porn with these in them is because the jews are funding it. i wouldnt be surprised if the jews have patreon accounts that they use to push their propaganda

>>37526

And where's your proof anon? You surely have one, because if you don't, that's ad hominem. Good luck finding proof in a Vietnamese cave panting wall.

>>37531

The difference is (((who))) pump money into it. Same with furries.

>>37534

>because if you don't, that's ad hominem

No its not you spastic, ad hom has nothing to do with proof, even if he was a self confessed and documented cuckold using that against an argument of his would be adhom. In the case of his motive the only possibilities are personal to him.

>>37541

>argumentum ad dumdum

>>37531

Of course is has to do with proof idiot. What you are saying it's nothing but implications. You don't have proof of anon having personal motives to do as you say he does, so you calling him names because of that os ad hominem. I give you you are not attacking an argument, because you don't have any.

>>37544

>Of course is has to do with proof idiot. What you are saying it's nothing but implications.

Even if he literally admitted he was a cuck, that doesn't mean I can use it against him when hes making an argument about something not personal to him, doing so would be an ad hom

However we are talking about something personal to him, his motives, if a gay man asks you to tell him why he likes gay porn can you do so without calling him gay? no, is it an ad hom? no. If a gay scientist presented evidence on why straight males do X and I dismissed said evidence because he was gay would that be ad hom? yes

>>37544

>Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]

>argument is rebutted

>rather than attacking the substance of the argument

>you are not attacking an argument

How is it an ad hominem then?

We are ascribing motive to his actions through plausible explanations, one of which is he is a someone with a cuckold fetish, this not a personal attack

>>37548

>How is it an ad hominem then?

Because his attacks consist of personal attack. His assumptions are not plausible considering this whole board is anonymous.

>>37547

His motives are irrelevant to his actions and you don't have proof of either.

>>37551

>Because his attacks consist of personal attack

he called me a faggot was that ad hom? no it had nothing to do with my argument, it was a personal attack not an ad hom, they are not the same

>His assumptions are not plausible considering this whole board is anonymous.

His assumptions are not verifiable as its anonymous, they sure as fuck can be plausible, if I say I love gay porn, there are few explanations as to why, one of which is very likely and that is I'm gay

>>37552

>His motives are irrelevant to his actions

His motives are relevant to the topic of why he chose those actions which is what the argument is about

>you don't have proof of either

No one has proof of anything, this is not a court of law, we are all working on assumptions here

>>37555

>Inquiring about his personal life to discredit his argument is not ad hominem

>Motives being relevant in an anonymous board

>>37555

>if I say I love gay porn, there are few explanations as to why

But the argument here is literally "I hate cucks", so what other reason is there to believe that he means anything other than that, to the point of inquire about his life.

>>37558

>discredit his argument

What was the argument we we're trying to discredit? copy and paste it. if there isn't one its not ad hom, this isn't hard

>>37559

>But the argument here is literally "I hate cucks"

That's not an argument, its a statement

>so what other reason is there to believe that he means anything other than that, to the point of inquire about his life.

Because there can be a multitude of reasons why he claims to hate cucks and attack them so vehemently, if we believe one reason is more likely and that reason is also hypocritical, that could be an interesting point of conversation

>>37561

>What was the argument we we're trying to discredit?

You are right, there is none, it's just a retard "you are cuck for hating cucks".

>Because there can be a multitude of reasons why he claims to hate cucks and attack them so vehemently

So? Did the anon gave you a single reason to believe something other than hating cucks? Because beyond that those are just baseless assumptions. That's not interesting, if something, you are more suspicious for pushing that narrative.

>>37563

Wrong image but close enough

>>37562

> it's just a retard "you are cuck for hating cucks".

wouldn't be the first wont be the last

>That's not interesting

Ive never interacted with a closest self loathing gay/cuck anything, thought it would be interesting to see how they think, it's pretty amusing

>>37567

>wouldn't be the first wont be the last

So? How is that important to his statement?

>I've never interacted

I've never knowingly interacted with a HIV positive and I don't plan to. It wouldn't be interesting, because cuckolding isn't amusing, it's disgusting.

>>37569

>So? How is that important to his statement?

It ads validity to the theory he is a self hating cuck, a theory you said was retarded

>I've never knowingly interacted with a HIV positive and I don't plan to. It wouldn't be interesting

I didn't want to interact with him because hes a cuck, I wanted to interact with him cause hes delusional, I wanted to observe the mental gymnastics of trying to justify why cucks should be banned etc. every answer he gives is a meme and amusing

>cuckolding isn't amusing, it's disgusting.

interesting, do you think it should be banned? if so how do you reconcile that with the possibility of living in a world dominated by cucks that would ban all non-cuck porn? would it be just if they did that to you? tell me more

>>37260

Are they gonna suspend any patreon developping a game with any incest part, or just those with a focus on incest?

Four Elements Trainer might be in danger.

>>37601

It is illegal in the US where patreon is based so makes sense, but I think games could easily get past it by just having the player define relationships, like this is X she is you what? friend, roommate, custom entry

>>37597

>>37597

>a theory you said was retarded

And it is seeing how there's no base.

>do you think it should be banned?

Yes.

>>37601

Probably just games that get flagged. There are still hundreds of incest games on Patreon, they're only going after the ones that are getting flagged.

>>37610

>And it is seeing how there's no base.

And how exactly is one to provide a basis on an anonymous board? All we have here is theory and assumptions.

>>37624

Which is exactly why I insist it's a pretty stupid assumption.

>>37625

Not really. It's not unreasonable to think that a game with cuck and incest content, if flagged, would drop the illegal content and focus on cuck content. Especially since cucks are willing to pay for that content.

And you can pretend that you're doing it for righteous reasons as well.

>>37628

It is unreasonable seeing how patreo shut down the entire game, not only the incest parts like the faggots used to avoid ALREADY. Flagging cuck games for incest sounds reasonable if you want to shut the whole game. Wanting patreon games is unreasonable in the first place.

>>37635

Patreon didn't shut down the whole game. The creator did as he didn't want to go back and make changes to appease Patreon. That and he's working on another game that is going to have NTR content without anything against Patreons rules.

>>37640

Patreon already told him if the game it's still on he is going to be banned, retard, the whole game, as an ultimatum, that's why he went back to his old game. So flagging incest shuts down the whole game, patreon is a lot more strict now.

Want more proof? Same happened with Blueballed by my Daughter. They simply don't tolerate it anymore, even after the dev made the daughter not your daughter at all.

Here is the thing, the problem is going to patreon in the first place, so a game being shut down from there is a good thing no matter what. Making porn games on patreon makes you a retarded dev and you should be boycotted and laughed at.

>>37641

No they didn't. He flat out said he had to make too many changes to appease Patreon. As long as they make changes to fit the new guidelines, then Patreon doesn't care. Why don't you make some more shit up you cuck.

>>37642

Check BB thread faggot, he literally said even with the changes they don't want the game anymore. Why do you defend cuck games?

>>37644

You mean where the creator of the game himself said it's on hold for now while he works on Glamour. To his patreons he has said that he might go back to BB if he find time to make all the changes Patreon wants.

Once more… stop making shit up you fucking cuck.

>>37647

No, retard, he said he was going to work on glamour as a replacement for patreon while also working on BB, but patreon didn't allow that either.

I'm sorry you are so mad your cuck game was taken down. Keep licking patreon's boot.

>>37652

No he fucking didn't, stop making shit up you cuck. He said it's "on hold, for now". No where did he say it was because Patreon wants the game gone. In fact he told his patreons that he might go back to it if he has the time to fix it to comply to patreons rules.

>>37654

He did faggot, that's the sole reason the game will be put on hold. He is trying to cash Glamour to keep feeding BB, or so he says, but he will probably bail once he realize no incest=no money.

>>37655

No. People believe he put BB on hold because he no longer wanted to do it. But it's not because Patreon won't allow it. Patreon will allow it, so long as he complies with their new guidelines. Which he doesn't want to waste his time doing.

And no he probably won't bail on Glamour as cuck fags like you are willing to pay for your shit fetish, which he has pretty much confirmed will be in the game.

>>37657

I don't give a shit about what people believe. He literally said if he didn't remove it he was going to be banned, with or without incest.

>>37658

No he fucking didn't. You're making shit up. He said he was putting the project on hold for now to work on Glamour. And that he might go back to it IF HE CHANGED IT TO COMPLY WITH PATREONS NEW RULES. They weren't going to ban him, he just had to follow the new rules. So stop fucking lying out your ass you cuck.

>>37659

>He said he was putting the project on hold for now to work on Glamour

Because patreon forced him to take off Big Brother, retard. Again, check the fucking thread and his own fucking message. You can even check it on fag95. He said he isn't planning on changing BB because even if he does patreon might try to fuck it up again, and yet the hack goes crawling back to it. So yes, they were going to ban him, said by him, in the fucking fag95 thread.

>>37666

>Because patreon forced him to take off Big Brother, retard. Again, check the fucking thread and his own fucking message.

You mean the message where he says he might go back to it if he decides to follow patreons new guidelines? That's all Patreon wanted, they didn't ban him outright, they'll allow the game should it follow their new guidelines. It's the same thing they've done with a bunch of other incest games. Temp remove them and allow them back only if the creator follows the new rules.

So once more… stop making shit up you cuck.

>>37670

And yet he said that he'll go back to it if he's willing to follow their new guidelines. Which he isn't, he was willing to compromise by making it step family, which they won't allow.

This has lead to people thinking he no longer wants to make the game and is using it as an excuse as every single other game flagged for incest has been back after switching to the new rules. But some how this one, which isn't even remotely as bad as Incestral Awakening is 'too much for patreon".

>>37671

>Incestral Awakening

>Bad

This game is big enough to make an example out of it, that's why Patreon targeted it and Blueballed by my Daughter. Plus, incestral awakening is 2D. They are more strict with 3D shit, something that also makes me happy.

Also, he said he'd go back to work on BB outside of patreon once he get enough shekels with cuckmour.

I understand Patreon want to restrict things that might be considered illegal, like porn games with underage characters. But censoring incest (even when there is no blood relation between the characters) does not make sense because adult games are not attached in Patreon's search sustem.

Amazon prohibits the marketing of erotic literature with the subject of incest because it worries that some child or more conservative family will end up buying a book called "family party" thinking it is a friendly and moral literature, and it is actually orgy between brothers. But Patreon does not have this risk. No one enters their page and falls into Date My Daughter by accident …

>>37683

OK, then how about literally every single other game that was removed for incest content that is now back because it was all changed to "roommates" including other big games.

>>37686

A matter of time.

>>37300

ckecked

Can somebody here provide a list of incest content that was taken down by patreon, excluding content that may have been taken down for being loli/shota?

>>37685

also consider that fake incest porn is an actual genre created by large adult video companies. not to mention porn with actresses that look underage Why is fake incest video games not okay? because Patreon

>>37698

My Girlfriends Amnesia - Back up again as the dude removed the sister fucking sister, and changed the rape scene to be consensual.

Incestral Awakening - Back up, still has the loli / shota / incest as he's skirting the rules with a second download that adds it all back to the game.

>>37610

>do you think it should be banned?

Yes.

>if so how do you reconcile that with the possibility of living in a world dominated by cucks that would ban all non-cuck porn? would it be just if they did that to you? tell me more

>>37691

>A matter of time.

Under what basis?

Good they were shit anyway

>>37260

patreon has some competition.

https://www.makersupport.com/

i hope this maker support site pans out.

>>37308

>wants to shame cucks

you dont get it, that is what their whole fetish is about

>>37320

no game gets taken down for cuckshit on patreon. games get taken down for incest and loli, and then that same dev focuses on cuckshit afterwards because it is safe to do.

>>37531

cucking has been around for a long, long time, just go to any swinger party. way longer than weg/hgames or even most porn. i would like to see the studies you are basing your assumptions on. you are not just making your arguments up, are (((you)))?

>>37670

no matter how much you want them to ban cucking games, they are only after incest in all its forms. and illegal stuff, obviously. BB was dripping incest from all its pores, making changes would have made no sense at all.

>>37704

>>37685

i am also curious as to why they are going after incest so hard. in the end it is probably something stupid like one of the board members having been touched by their stepdaddy or something, but i srsly want to know (probably never will though)

>>37895

Incest is illegal in many countries including the one patreon is based in, hence why you see a lot of incest porn on sites like pornhub prefaced with step- or not-sister etc.

As for why porn of it is, when the actors arent related all I can say is loli is illegal in many countries so with that maybe incest and bestiality CG porn is also frowned upon/illegal?

I'm pretty sure Hreinn games said they we're concerned about a scene in their game that had an mythical animal

>>37898

>incest is illegal

obviously, but patreon is going after anything that slightly smells of incest, including the step-relationships you mention. they are going above and beyond anything they would be obliged to do in order to be legally safe. they are clearly pushing some kind of anti-incest agenda and i just wonder why.

>>37895

I don't know either. As someone said above, incest is illegal in the US, but creating works that portray incest is not, and I have the impression that even if incest is glorified in the work, it is still allowed in the US.

My guess is that Patreon had a hard time dealing with the fact that Date My Daughter was one of the most successful products on the whole site. Probably they were in a delicate situation sometimes having to explain to investors or something that one of the most successful products on the site was a game where the father needs to seduce and fuck his own daughter (who even looked like a minor).

I think the censorship of the incest theme was a direct consequence of the success that Date My Daughter got on the site.

The real villain is not Patreon, but Paypal. The company that sells ebooks "smashwords" had the same problem that Patreon is facing because of Paypal:

"On a Saturday, I received an email from PayPal notifying me I had about five days to remove all books containing themes of rape, bestiality, and incest. That was upsetting; we’d been working with PayPal for almost four years. I offered to meet with them, but they responded that they didn’t take meetings, and this was their policy."

Paypal claims they had to make this decision thanks to pressure from credit card companies (for the above conspiracists who were saying it's all a Jewish plan to spread cuckoldry, they must be correct lol).

At the end of the controversy between Smashwords and Paypal, it was agreed that some rules would be relaxed. Patreon's new TOS is already based on this new rule. Link of the article:

https://www.fastcompany.com/1834786/paypal-youve-met-your-match-erotica-writers

I think this explains why Patreon is censoring so many games.

>>37260

Graphical depictions of incestuous intercourse are illegal in Canada. Even in situations where the performers are not real.

Shit, its on shaking ground whether it's even legal for me to talk in public about how my cousin molested me when I was 12.

Patreon has to follow Canadian law just as closely as it does American law and they do not have freedom of speech protections for sexual content.

Here and in other threads I've seen people shilling Makersupport. Why would it be better than Patreon? It still uses Paypal (so, I expect this same shit >>37996 ) and their ToS don't look much different:

>A limited subset of adult content is permitted, while the vast majority of adult content is not permitted. The following content is not permitted in any case:

>Pornography:

>Photos, videos, or audio including real people or depicted characters engaging in sexual acts

>Content including themes of bestiality, incest, rape, or exploitation of children

>…

>The following content is permitted in most cases:

>Cartoon depictions of scantily clad, but not nude, characters

>Writing including sexual topics, as long as they don't include themes of bestiality, incest, rape, or child exploitation.

>>37894

>you dont get it, that is what their whole fetish is about

I don't care, I still shame them.

>and then that same dev focuses on cuckshit afterwards because it is safe to do.

Bullshit, there's no proof. Most of them actually drop the project. BB and research into corruption are 2 examples, there's plenty more like DMD.

>BB was dripping incest from all its pores

BB is cuckshit.

>>38022

Hatreon is better.

>>37996

>awaiting for the "FUCK PAYPAL" post

>>38030

I dont think that hatreon is better, there must be a better alternative than some site with just alt-rights as a public, is there a site with an general adult audience in mind that involves croudfunding but not paypal?

also hatreon has like a month on mantenaince

>>38064

>>38064

>>38064

>there must be a better alternative than some site with just alt-rights as a public

Why would you want any different?

Can we just fucking get rid of these shitty laws already? These anti-incest laws should have been thrown out already. Unfortunately, most people have no problems with throwing other groups under the bus so long as they get what they want.

But honestly, I think the only way to go about this is to use cryptocurrency. If cryptocurrency does not crash and burn, it's only going to become more important and more stable. With a global economy, it only makes sense for currency to become globalized as well.

But right now, it honestly just doesn't make sense for artists to take crypto over established currency.

Can someone explain how jews are at fault for banning incest content…

>>38118

Patreon is banning content to appease payment and advertisement companies. Since historically jews control the money and this mandate is coming from the money people…. it must be a semitic/cuck conspiracy

Can someone explain how jews are at fault for banning incest content…>>38132

The fuck advertisers??? They get their money by being a middle man for donations, why do they need to appeal to advertisers over their patrons? This isn't youtube.

>>38180

In case you haven't realized people blame everything on jews here. One of our biggest boards is /pol/.

>>38082

>take crypto into an exchange wallet

>market sell on receipt

>immediately withdraw in fiat

you'd probably even pay less fees this way than through patreon because both patreon and paypal takes a significant portion of recieved funds and if you have to convert to a different fiat they take another fee on top of that, as well as an inflated exchange rate

it makes no sense for non-tech-illiterate devs to take fiat over crypto

>>38184

*shrug*

Maybe you're right.

>>38189

*shoves you*

leave this thread you lukewarm nocoiner !