[–]▶ No.87070>>87103 >>87115 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Is it still really cheating if he's taking his load from a nice, christian pup you'd even bend over for yourself if you had the chance?
▶ No.87098>>87100 >>87103
>>87073
Your new fetish, atheist!
▶ No.87100>>87103 >>87104 >>87110
>>87098
A subby atheist getting dommed by a religious top is pretty hot tbh.
▶ No.87104>>87124
>>87100
Normal for a fox. So eagerly jump into the role. Fits like a soft glove.
▶ No.87110>>87135
>>87100
lol it’s the other way around. As it’s been for centuries.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csr_Hw020bM
▶ No.87115
>>87070 (OP)
>christian homo
This is a sin tho.
▶ No.87122
DONT KINK SHAME MY FETISH> STOP DISLIKIGN WHAT I LUKE I LOVE VIRGIN CHIRISTAM LOADS IN MY BUTT WEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
▶ No.87124>>87125 >>87179
>>87104
That's not even me. I'm not a slut.
▶ No.87125
▶ No.87135>>87145
>>87110
Shut up and get on your knees, unbeliever.
*unzips pants and puts his cock down your throat*
▶ No.87145
>>87135
oh murr *gags on your cock* yeahhh mmmm.
▶ No.87161>>87181 >>87184
Is it still really cheating if he's taking his load from a trve, kvlt pup you'd even bend over for satan if you had the chance?
▶ No.87179>>87287
>>87124
god i wish that were me
▶ No.87181>>87186 >>87187
>>87161
Hmm that seems less attractive because it's a Satanist doing what you'd expect a Satanist to do. On the other paw if he's a Christian it's sexier because he's breaking the rules and being a naughty boy.
▶ No.87184
>>87161
Technically that's Peter's Cross
▶ No.87187
>>87181
this is why everyone hates us
▶ No.87226>>87263 >>87268
>>87186
This board should wordfilter the word "hand" to "paw".
All in favor raise your
▶ No.87268>>87278 >>87294
>>87226
...Handpaw?
I like how we're in a thread about a fetish for being railed by a Christian, But using "Paw" instead of "Hand" is too cringy.
▶ No.87278>>87319
>>87268
One's good taste, the other is FA tier shit.
▶ No.87287>>87290
>>87179
your too fat to be a twink.
▶ No.87294>>87296 >>87299 >>87319 >>87320
>>87268
too cringy? I only hate it because it's the dumbest thing I've heard. I couldn't care less about some kink. Let's just start saying "everyfurry" instead of "everybody" too while we're at it.
▶ No.87295>>87297
>>87290
its common for furries to be fat.
▶ No.87296>>87317
>>87294
ever seen furries on youtube videos cringy af
▶ No.87297>>87298
>>87295
I'm only moderately overweight/skinnyfat I'll have you know. But yeah I'm actually a top anyways.
▶ No.87298
>>87297
no thanks. i dont want a top i have one in my life.
▶ No.87299>>87319
>>87294
Good idea, let's do it everyfurry!
▶ No.87315>>87327
i know the one guy in op's pic and what is this thread?
Seriously though, what is this? x3
▶ No.87317
>>87296
Literally every furry youtuber looks like straight dogshit out of suit. I've yet to see one that is at least a 5/10.
▶ No.87319>>87324 >>87325 >>87326 >>87347 >>87416
>>87294
>I only hate it because it's the dumest thing I've heard.
In other words, You find it cringy.
>>87278
I would argue that obscure fetishes are also "FA tier shit"
>>87299
I know I was just defending the use of "Paw" but "Everyfurry" doesn't make sense to me, Assuming we were anthro animals IRL I'm pretty sure we would still be using "Everyone".
▶ No.87320
>>87294
>Everyfurry
>Not evfurryone
▶ No.87324
>>87319
>Implying that getting a hefty load from a nice christian pup is FA tier
Nigger leave.
▶ No.87325
>>87319
something being dumb doesn't always correlate it to being cringy. Regardless, for me to say it was cringy would be a misuse of the word, since i did not cringe to "on the other paw.'
▶ No.87326
>>87319
also, using "paw" instead of "hand" wouldn't make sense either. A paw is the foot of an animal, not a hand, so anthros would still have have their hands be called "hands," unless you're telling me anthros have feet for hands.
▶ No.87327
>>87315
A beautiful butterfly.
▶ No.87347>>87415 >>87429
>>87270
Is that really the best you got bitch?
>>87319
>Implying them calling it cringe diminishes their point in anyway.
▶ No.87415>>87491
>>87347
>Implying I was implying such
▶ No.87416>>87422 >>87424
>>87319
"Paw" is fucking garbage. It sounds silly because everyone knows paws are animal feet. Since it's being as a blanket replacement I often see "Footpaws" which only works mildly because logically it would be "FootFoot"but in reality they probably mean "Foothands" which is even more freakin' stupid.
▶ No.87422
>>87416
Your complaint seems to be directed at people who misuse the term rather than the term itself.
▶ No.87424
>>87416
Don't overthink it. Just accept it. It's Paw. Let the furryness flow through you.
▶ No.87429>>87491
>>87347
Why do I need to debunk your ideology when your own fashy daddy got triggered by the consequences of it and killed himself?
▶ No.87479
>>87439
... Good cheating?
>>87440
Well, sure, some might not get asked that often. But that doesn't magically make "No" suddenly part of the fox vocabulary.
▶ No.87491
>>87415
>Implying I was implying such
Then why "correct" him?
>>87429
>your ideology
Way too left wing for me actually, but nice try.
>pic
Outside of the commies purity spiraling or incompetenting themselves they are the most effective way to remove commies.