>>80607
>It need not become a derailment if you'd just accept that I'm correct after a single fucking post
Derailing wouldn't be a concern if people stopped doing the thing that starts a derail. You didn't need to throw drumpf into it, the post didn't even need a reply. Where do you think the appropriate and thread relevant response to
>A fool and his money are easily parted
is
<Let me know when Trump and his money are parted
?
You aren't addressing his claim in any way people can come to without your specific perspective, and even if you desperately needed an example that bad why drumpf? You could have easily named some rich-enough popfur that everybody hates and thinks is retarded, and your message would have come across way easier without the political faggotry and just maybe it might have less derail potential too.
>Are you THAT upset that I blew your philosophical garbage out of the water
I haven't posted in the thread at all before the post you're replying to. I'm just tired of the politics, I have no stake in either side.
>with a dose of objective reality?
I come here for fur, not politics. "Objective reality" doesn't have to always mean politics either, theres a difference between the "objective reality" of physics and the "objective reality" of bullshit political trash.
Now, lets see if we can get back on topic without anyone else fucking exploding