[–]▶ No.62762>>62767 >>62774 >>62804 >>62806 >>62859 >>62947 >>63011 >>64149 >>68757 >>68801 >>68803 >>69567 >>69599 >>72588 >>72669 >>73894 >>74277 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Let's have a nice datamining thread!
Choose your ideal foxgirl from the picture.
I choose 4: hardcore closet furry.
MFW y'all gonna choose 1 or 2 because it's easy to make fursuits out of them.
▶ No.62767>>62768
>>62762 (OP)
I'm a 4 guy myself. Maybe more of a '3.5-4.5', if you will. I like more /tg/-tier babes.
It's why I prefer the term "xenophile" to furry, usually.
▶ No.62768>>62770
>>62767
My man. That's a really sexy animation you got there!
BTW is that artist still active, or did he die in 2015?
▶ No.62770
>>62768
No idea. I hope he lives. His stuff's great.
▶ No.62774
▶ No.62796
I'm gonna say N/A because I'm not a fan of foxes and I prefer men.
However I'll pretend it's a wolfdude chart and say about 4 or so. 3 and 5 are also appealing though.
▶ No.62801
▶ No.62804
>>62762 (OP)
3-5,
2 being passable but not preferred.
▶ No.62806
▶ No.62809
1 ew a hairless ape with another animal's tail and ears
2 meh
2.5 okay
3-4.5 very good
5 okay
▶ No.62817
▶ No.62818>>62829
▶ No.62824>>62829 >>62834 >>62855
I don't like girls. That said, most western depictions of anthros actually fall between 3 and 4, and aren't in that kind of style at all.
▶ No.62829>>62834 >>62835 >>62844 >>64141 >>64149 >>72601 >>72609
>>62818
>>62824
Here's a faggot cat version for you anons.
Anyway, 4 is perfect. 3 and 5 are good and the other two are meh
▶ No.62834>>69599
>>62829
>Here's a faggot cat version for you anons.
OP here, thanks, saved.
Maybe >>62824 is on to something. If most of us prefer 4-ish then explain to me pic related, which is basically a human body with animal head and skin. I'd love to say it's a variant of 2 but it isn't.
▶ No.62835
>>62829
I wonder what Oob gets up to these days.
And where the catboy's dick went in between 3 and 4.
▶ No.62844>>62845 >>62856 >>62878 >>68801
>>62829
I have a load of these
▶ No.62855>>62974
>>62824
No, most western depictions are 2-3. Most eastern depictions are 3-4.
Only exception really being pokemon.
▶ No.62856>>62870
>>62845
>>62844
Why are most of these terrible and completely skip the beast-like chunk in favor of some cartoon tier shit?
The bug chart was acceptable, but everything else just went for the same shit for most the first three, sudden cutsey cartoon jazz, and then feral.
▶ No.62859
▶ No.62862
3 and 4 a best for lewds
5 a best for cute shit
1 and 2 is just /monster/ shit
▶ No.62870>>62918
>>62856
There needs to be another axis for cartoony-vs-realistic style.
▶ No.62878>>62949 >>64072
>>62844
I wish I could draw (better) so I could do one of these for my fursona.
Anyway, I'd say the third one here is the most accurate for the western furry style when it comes to body shape, usually D or E (more often E for males than for females). Before Zootopia, it was rare to have anthros that were proportioned like quadrupeds (noodle torsos and short stumpy legs) than like humans. That was how kemono did things, but not anyone else. Basically, compare Robin Hood with Nick Wilde.
▶ No.62918
>>62870
Agreed.
I'm a fair ways on the realistic end, but not really too far. I like a slight artistic smoothness to them, rather than raw detail. It's why I love sketchwork the most.
▶ No.62947
>>62762 (OP)
4 and 5 are top-tier.
▶ No.62949>>62970
>>62878
Not sure this is much better.
▶ No.62970
>>62949
This one is better for sure.
▶ No.62974>>62982
>>62855
Most eastern depictions are 1 anon.
▶ No.62982>>63045
>>62974
Not when you're talking kemono.
Though, some of them do stick on hair, too. But the overall frame is clearly animalistic.
▶ No.63011
>>62762 (OP)
Here's a less shitty version of your image.
3-5 are good, 2 can be OK. I prefer bipedal but I like feral as well.
▶ No.63018
▶ No.63045>>63046
>>62982
>not when you're talking kemono
Oh so just specifically leave out 1 then.
Also
>kemono friends
▶ No.63046
>>63045
I don't think that lot's actually "kemono". Then again, I do not speak gook.
In any case, 1 is straight up monstershit.
To be fair, most all gook stuff does do shit wighair. But I'd argue the rest of the character is properly bestial.
▶ No.64062>>64091
>>64048
>what are felinids.
▶ No.64072
>>62878
I've always preferred disney/kemono over "person w/ animal head"
▶ No.64091>>64094
>>64062
It's actually pretty vague. No matter where they fall on the furry scale, though, I bet you that a black templar would have a grand time murderizing them
▶ No.64094
>>64091
True, but they'd purge you for a wart on your head, or a slightly too big toe.
▶ No.64141>>64142
>>62829
Maybe I should've been more specific. I don't like mammals.
▶ No.64142
>>64141
We do need a good lizard lady chart.
▶ No.64149
>>62829
>>62762 (OP)
i would all 5 tiers of both charts.
when something's cute, its cute.
▶ No.68757
>>62762 (OP)
any, depends on what mood my dick is in
▶ No.68770
>Closeted
>As if furry is anything more than a fetish at most and that someone would "come out" as a furry
>Y'all
>"MFW" but no face
Unsurprisingly, OP is a faggot.
▶ No.68772
Necromancy is forbidden in 32 realms.
▶ No.68774
>>62845
>tfw no qt moth gf
▶ No.68801>>69662 >>69672
>>62762 (OP)
1. Genetic Abomination
2. Deformed Mutant
3. More Animal-Like
4. Yes
5. If it can talk
I'm so far gone, I can't fap to human women anymore. I have difficulty with 2D, but 3D is impossible to find attractive.
>>62844
>First Pic
5 & 6. Everything before is too human like and everything after is too animal or not big enough.
>Second Pic
4 is still the best selection
>Third Pic
Don't like any, to be honest although E and F are close. I don't see any difference between C and D either besides wider hips and no pants.
>Fourth Pic
I loath the show she's from so I can't find it attractive, more annoying if anything.
>Fifth Pic
Doesn't help that it's a terrible OC.
>>62845
These are all awful. But...
>Bug Chart
Bugs scare me, but 20% is somewhat cute. I feel I'd like a design somewhere in between 70% and 90%.
>>64048
That lady looks somewhat Hispanic. I'd rather be with an animal I couldn't have kids with than have racemixed kids.
▶ No.68803>>68804
>>62762 (OP)
1 2 and 3 are for me anime furry girls need to piss off
▶ No.68804>>68805
>>68803
>anime furry girls need to piss off
>picks the 3 most anime of the choices
▶ No.68805
>>68804
i realized my fuck up read it from right to left
▶ No.69126
I can work with 4. But otherwise I'm a pretty hard 5.
▶ No.69567
>>62762 (OP)
1-2 is literal normalfag-tier
3 is passable
4-5 are patrician taste
▶ No.69599
>>62762 (OP)
I like humanoids/bipeds so 1-4 easy though have a bias towards 4 (needs longer legs and be at least as tall as 1) if going for anthro, don't care for quadrupeds.
> easy to make fursuits out of them.
Fursuits and fursonas are absolutely fucking retarded.
>>62834
The people here aren't representative of the furry population, remember we're a niche of a niche of a niche of a niche.
▶ No.69662>>69666
>>68801
>that pic
Where do my waifus fit, anon?
▶ No.69666>>69677
>>69662
They fit in the trash.
▶ No.69672>>69687
>>68801
>Tumblr memes
>hating on classic monster girls
>thinking catgirls are monster girls
>Humanized versions of doom monsters, a xenomorph, and a death claw instead of just the actual monsters
Faggotry across the board.
▶ No.69677>>69687
>>69666
Of course Satan would have a shit opinion.
▶ No.69687>>72608
▶ No.72588
>>62762 (OP)
I think I'm more of a 2-3, just depends.
▶ No.72601>>72696 >>72725
▶ No.72608>>72613
>>69687
Furry is actually HUMANS with animal features.
The anubis and RA where men with animal heads.
Feral is just Disney shit
For example, nekopara is furry, pokemon arent. Kemono friends is furry, sonic isnt.
▶ No.72609
>>62829
>For Hug
3 > 2 > 4 > 5 > 1
>For Fug
2 > 3 >>>>> 4 > 1 = 5
▶ No.72613>>72614 >>72650
>>72608
who the fuck gave you authority to define these terms?
▶ No.72614
>>72613
Only Gay men who redefined Furry Fandom to be something that get their dicks wet can set the definitions here.
▶ No.72650
>>72613
The literal definition of furry.
▶ No.72651>>72653 >>72665 >>72737
'Furries' should be called 'beasts' as they have very little human attributes and are closer to inhumanoid monsters.
A werewolf is a MONSTER not a furry. Most furries have werewolf like anatomy, therefore they are technically monsters and not leh special fandom material.
Look familiar? Yes, it does.
Although I have no problem with furries who prefer beastly characters, i'm just explaining.
▶ No.72653>>72660
>>72651
>'Furries' should be called 'beasts' as they have very little human attributes and are closer to inhumanoid monsters.
What are you trying to say though, that "furry" is supposed to mean the enthusiasts rather than the creatures themselves? Because in that case "Beast" certainly sounds better, but you're never going to get people to use that.
>implying furries are inhumanoid
Stupid dumb ESL tripfag, read a dictionary
▶ No.72660>>72672
>>72653
The only thing furries share with humans is using both legs and talking, making them more like monsters.
Yes, exactly. Furries can be called furries, but the creatures should be 'beasts'
▶ No.72665
>>72651
You're fucking retarded.
▶ No.72669>>72670 >>72672 >>72685 >>72751
>>62762 (OP)
Reminder that 5 is true patrician taste
▶ No.72670>>72671
>>72669
Reminder that this is disgusting and has no real line between furry and zoophilia.
▶ No.72671>>72688
>>72670
Except it's cartoon, and she's clearly consenting to have her foxwomb sown with seed.
▶ No.72672>>72685 >>72689
>>72669
Meh. As long as she can talk, I guess.
>>72660
Cease your namefaggotry.
▶ No.72685>>72690
>>72672
She doesn't need to talk as long she makes sounds when I thrust.
>>72669
Man, I live for this shit. Long live Rule 34.
▶ No.72688>>72696
>>72671
> it's okay if it's not reel guis
No, you're still attracted to an animal, it has nothing to do with consent
▶ No.72689>>72690
>>72672
Cease your childish inability to listen and learn.
▶ No.72690>>72699 >>72703
>>72689
I'm well capable of listening and learning.
Doesn't make you any more of a cancerous faggot.
>>72685
Bro, that's just straight bestiality, then.
That's no good.
▶ No.72696
>>72688
>>72601
>tripfag
>having shit taste
Like pottery
▶ No.72699>>72709
>>72690
As long as its drawn, anything is fuckable.
The cuter the better. I can't fap to stuff thats sexy or slutty. Thats boring and easy.
▶ No.72703>>72709 >>72728
>>72690
Nothing wrong with bestiality. It's okay to kill and animal because its flesh is tasty, but not okay to fuck it? It's okay to chop a dog's balls off without his consent, but not fondle them? It's okay to tie down a bitch and allow a male dog to rape her, but not a male human?
What kind of retard troll-logic are you operating on??
▶ No.72709>>72729 >>72797
>>72699
That's fair, as far as what's okay to fap to, or draw someone fucking, but, in this context, it's more the issue of wanting to fuck the thing I'd say.
I certainly understand lusting after some qt feral babes.
>>72703
Fair. Maybe I have an old-fashioned outlook. I see sex as for more 'love' and that type of deal.
Not just the physical pleasure, as it were.
▶ No.72725>>72728
>>72601
>one
Why are you even on the furry board you weeaboo retard
▶ No.72728>>72738 >>72743
>>72725
Kemonomimi is furry, sweetie, it's just not zoophile furry.
>>72703
Not compatible species, humans are omnivores, and if we didn't fix them, cities would be animal oceans.
▶ No.72729>>72730 >>72773
>>72709
I don't lust over them (at least not that particular picture). I'm just saying they don't need to talk. Would you now screw a Pikachu just because that's all it can say?
▶ No.72730
>>72729
Now = not
Everytime. I'd fix it but then the password lies show up.
▶ No.72737>>72770
>>72651
werewolves are anthropomorphic wolves you retard. Why are you even here? Go die in a fire.
▶ No.72738>>72784
>>72728
>Kemonomimi is furry
No it's not. Also your logic is retarded, just like you;
>werewolves only share a minor trait with humans, such as language and using arms/legs, so it's not furry
>but humans with animal ears and tails ARE furry, even though they share nothing but that and talking
Go back to DeviantArt, faggot. You have no place here.
▶ No.72743
>>72728
>Kemonomimi is furry
>literally nothing furry on them except ears and maybe a tail
Yeah right.
You don't understand this fandom. Please leave.
▶ No.72751>>74270
>>72669
I like to think of this as more of a 4 than 5.
▶ No.72770>>72774
>>72737
And what do you think an anthropomorphic wolf is, hmmm? I'll give you a hint: it's a type of monster and beast
▶ No.72773
>>72729
If the thing's sapient, I'd fuck it, plain and simple. I'm not sure picachu is. But, I know Meowth is, so Meowth is fuck able.
▶ No.72774>>72777 >>72804
>>72770
Depends on the setting, retard.
For example, if you have some straight up snake qt in your sci fi lot, it's just an alien, not a monster necessarily.
Go back to /monster/, you worthless weeb.
▶ No.72777>>72780
>>72774
Lol. Your aggressive reveals that you know you're losing the argument.
▶ No.72780>>72784
>>72777
Not an argument, faggot.
The reason I'm insulting you is because you're a cancerous tripfag, and a monstershitter.
▶ No.72784>>72805
>>72738
furry: human with animal features/traits.
zoofag shit: animal that has nothing in common with a human but use of it's hind legs and talking.
>>72780
He's not me, and I found out he just copied my trip (using name), but he bears a point.
>>>72780 will never get to enjoy the soft human butt on pic related while being stroked by his tail.
▶ No.72797
>>72709
Fuck, I really like that artist's style.
Screw porn, I'd watch an actual show like that.
▶ No.72804
>>72774
Now that's good taste my friend.
▶ No.72805>>72815
>>72784
No you fucking retard. Furries are anthropomorphized animals I. E. Animals with human qualities. Get your stupid shit neko garbage out of here.
▶ No.72815>>72816 >>72848
>>72805
That's just a monster.
An animal on two legs that can talk is a monster. Ie, something with little human qualities.
A rayon waltzing around on two legs is a monster.
An actual furry could be counted as an animal who was given a HUMAN FORM. like a boy with wolfy attributes who still looks human, who used to be an actual wolf. that's an anthro. if you've ever seen earth-chan, ebola-chan, etc. Those are anthropomorphic....things. they aren't just the object itself given the ability to walk and talk.
▶ No.72816
>>72815
Rayon/raion: electric cat btw.
▶ No.72848>>72850
>>72815
Can we ban this fucking faggot?
▶ No.72850>>72853
>>72848
Let's just ban tripfag in general, unless they're providing actual content.
Basically, anyone not a writefag, or drawfag.
▶ No.72853
>>72850
Well they're doing neither.
▶ No.72919
>>72904
This guy just confirmed he's not even a furry, just a troll who hates furries and is trying to stir up shit. If that's not grounds for a global, I don't know what is.
Also, ban evading should immediately result in real-life consequences. Too bad Anonymous lost all their teeth after GG and now just sit around sucking Trump's cock all day.
▶ No.73894
>>62762 (OP)
4 and 5, depending on the moment, consider me 4,75
▶ No.74270
>>72751
That one's damn hot. And I agree it looks more like 4 than 5. That huge wide ass is definitely 4. Also it's clear her fore limbs are arms with hands and opposable thumbs. So the artist's a liar, boxes should have a "4" written on them.
For the record I consider pic related to be 4 also.
▶ No.74277
>>62762 (OP)
Anything from 3 to 3.8? or something
Kinda hard to tell exactly what would qualify for what.