>>57867
As an addendum to this, it is only possible to marry the ideals of a Creator God with that of a functional, relevant evolution, if you remove human conceit. See, nearly all who believe in God believe that He specifically created the Universe and all that is inside of it for Man, or at least the Earth and Solar System. But evolution does not have a teleology, does not have a direction or a purpose. It's impossible to have evolution function independently of God's direct will and still definitely result in the creation of humans. Assuming that intelligent life (or even more complex life) is automatically selected for by evolution is erroneous, arrogant, and mathematically absurd. There have been billions of species on this planet, but only a few (all closely related) with any measure of sapience. Complex mammalian life typically rises and goes extinct within a few million years at best, but bacteria and viruses are STILL here. And I doubt anyone would argue that the propensity to create nuclear weapons and civilizations filled with pain and angst is beneficial to the continuation of the species.
So, without a personal direction, you'd have the possibility that God would go through all this trouble building a Solar System, and setting evolution in motion, only for humans to not evolve out of the soup of life. Then He would just look like some stupid incompetent jackass, like that one kid in chemistry class who fouled up his calculations and failed to precipitate any crystals in the supersaturated solution.
As said before, it is possible to believe in a Creator who merely set things in the Universe in motion (gave the Big Bang a poke, basically) and then either left or merely observes the Universe without interfering. This is commonly referred to as Deism. But only a small number of people have this belief, with estimates ranging from a fraction of a percent of Americans, to as many as 15-20%, largely depending on how the question is worded. This is comparable, and sharing much overlap, with atheism. As a God who does not interfere with human lives is largely irrelevant to human life, other than from a philosophical point of view, it doesn't really make a difference. Either way, it is belief but not a faith or a religion.
Thus, it would be most correct to say that belief in Creator God in ANY religious or faithful sense, as a matter of practicality, is incompatible with belief in a functional and meaningful evolution.