[–]▶ No.57510>>57681 >>57709 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
hello welcome to e621 hate thread.
here you post your memes,experiences,rants,etc about this site.
although the site has a decent system with tags and a larger presence of artists then other sites, those are the only two good things about the site.
BTW the mods are fags there :)
▶ No.57512>>57513
The site hasn't had valid certification ever since it was established. A main problem with the mirror site, e926.net (which works fine if you are on a secure connection), defaults the rating to rating:s.
THERE IS NO WAY TO CHANGE/REMOVE RATING:S. THIS IS THE FUTURE FOR THE SITE
▶ No.57513>>57515 >>57516
>>57512
I thought e926 was the sfw mirror of the site in general, though?
Also, did you mean
>~pokemon ~digimon -female -rating:s score:>20
▶ No.57515>>57980
>>57513
That and furry.booru.org are the only ones that work. Also, I tried -rating:s, but it does absolutely nothing.
▶ No.57516>>57518 >>57686
>>57513
But where will you fit
>-intersex
into that, anon?
▶ No.57518
>>57516
On your blacklist. It's uncommon enough that it won't clog up the 75 results too much
▶ No.57633>>57645 >>57671
I know there was already a thread about it, but does anyone else still find the permanent DNP on paid content rule to be completely retarded and an act of trying to save face by the staff?
They even locked the forum thread about the announcement so nobody can even talk about it anymore.
▶ No.57645
>>57633
Think it was the constant attempts to dox the shitbag admins.
To be fair, it's not that hard to find their info, but we don't need the possible legal issues.
▶ No.57647
I literally don't see anything wrong with that site and without with that and Paheal, we wouldn't get porn that easily at all. Unless you use cancer like rule34.xxx, where literally anything is declared Rule 34,
▶ No.57666>>57673
>you will never pour molten silver down ratte's throat
▶ No.57671>>57677 >>57684 >>58160
>>57633
no because art doesn't belong to the world, you entitled libtard. Stop pretending property ownership is worse than Hitler.
▶ No.57673
I hate that they added a new feature which forces you to click to expand an image to full size. No more drag and drop, they fucked it completely to hell.
>>57666
Calm down, Satan.
▶ No.57677>>57691 >>57805
>>57671
>no because art doesn't belong to the world
Correct, it belongs to me. Yes, all of it. And as owner, I choose to share it with the world. By the way, why haven't you read Stirner yet?
▶ No.57681
>>57510 (OP)
Criticizing popufurs like Zaush and Jasonafex will get the mods to ban you temporarily for both "harassment" and "refusal to use blacklist".
▶ No.57684>>57690 >>58160
>>57671
Art isn't property, you retard, it's a product. You sell your labor to produce a product or provide a service, and you are paid for doing so. Can a chef walk out to the parking lot and demand the food be returned after it's already been paid for? No. Can a guy making machine parts demand the parts be given back after his employer paid him to make them? No.
So why should an artist be able to demand that his art be returned after it's been paid for?
▶ No.57686>>57697
>>57516
e621 thinks intersex and herm are the same thing. how fucking dumb can they be?
▶ No.57690>>57695 >>57698
>>57684
>Art isn't property, you retard, it's a product.
Wrong. Intellectual property. Copyright. Author's rights. These are abstract concepts that society has decided exist and are legally enforceable. No amount of wishful thinking is going to change that, but if you want to make your own art and release it into the public domain - thereby forfeiting your ability to make extra money off it - please, be my guest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors%27_rights
▶ No.57695
>>57690
>Intellectual property. Copyright. Author's rights. These are abstract concepts that society has decided exist and are legally enforceable. No amount of wishful thinking is going to change that
Right, so no more Pokemon porn?
▶ No.57697
>>57686
Doesn't really bother me, at least it's one less thing that e6 taggers can fuck up and make my blacklist worthless
▶ No.57698>>57705
>>57690
You do realize that you're violating Disney's copyrights by saving and posting that screencap of a movie that they own, right? You know how at the end of every movie, it says that you can face criminal liabilities of like $100,000 or several years in prison for copying and distributing any part of the movie? Well, that's what YOU just did.
That's legally enforceable. If they came in here right now and decided to push their lawyers on you, you'd be fucked royal, and no amount of wishful thinking would change that.
So, tell me again about the rigidity of laws, and how sensible they are.
▶ No.57707>>58160
>>57705
it's not tu quoque when you argue something can't be done on that basis.
i.e. if you reply to "humans can't fly" with "you are a human and you are flying", that's not accusing them of hypocrisy, it's pointing out that their own actions disprove the thing they're claiming can't be done
on a tangent the whole reason intellectual ""property"" exists is because the obvious rules of actual property don't apply, given the non-physical nature of the thing. It's basically a fudge for social purposes rather than a direct situation of property relations. But despite typing this because it's fascinating I know it'll only bait stupid replies.
▶ No.57709>>57725
>>57510 (OP)
Nice reddit spacing OP.
▶ No.57725>>57809
>>57709
>sage is a downvote!
▶ No.57741>>57805
>>57691
It's only 206 pages, you could finish it in an afternoons. I was reado twice that amount when I was in grade school. If this is too much for you then you must have some serious ADHD.
▶ No.57795
>>57705
Tu quoque is a fallacy because it presents a completely separate criticism about a different topic that the one being discussed. To bring one up about the SAME topic isn't tu quoque; it's pointing out hypocrisy and the illogical nature of the argument.
In this case, it was also used to reference the fact that furries cannot claim IP over characters that they don't own. Because most of the fandom's art is made of rule34, this is topical.
Finally, IP is not automatic. An artist or company has to file the requisite paperwork (a bit like a patent) which requires time and money. If you haven't done that, you don't own SHIT.
▶ No.57805>>57807 >>57832 >>57851 >>57855
>>57741
>>57677
>reading the ravings of a literal cuckold
▶ No.57807
>>57805
if people will listen to sargon...
▶ No.57809
>>57725
No, but I didn't exactly want to bump the thread to say "nice redditspacing OP", now, did I?
▶ No.57832
>>57805
>Still using "cuck" unironically
▶ No.57851>>57855
>>57805
Cuckold is a spook, It was stirners and mines inability to protect what was mine and kill our wifes son.
No I'm not crying, MUH EGO MUH OWNERSHIP IS AN ILLUSION!
▶ No.57855>>57921
>>57805
>your wife cheating on you is the same thing as being tied to a chair and forced to watch
>Ad Hominem
Why are you so spooked, Anon?
>>57851
nice spooks nerd lol
▶ No.57894>>57895
How does being tied to a chair NOT make it cuckoldry?
▶ No.57895>>57921
>>57894
I thought cuckolding was a mutual agreement for it to happen.
▶ No.57921>>57945 >>58009
>mention shitty author was literally a cuckold (as in he was factually a cuckold)
>make anons mad
>>57895
Agreement is not a requirement. >>57855 doesn't seem to know the definition of the word at all.
▶ No.57945>>57948 >>58009
>>57921
>was literally a cuckold
But why does that even matter? It's just a meaningless catchall /pol/ insult, whether it's true or not. Does that affect his philosophy, or whether or not he's correct? Of course not. It's just a convenient way to ignore someone's argument, akin to saying "Yeah? Well, you're a FAGGOT!!" when you can't come up with a counter-argument.
▶ No.57948
▶ No.57949
>NOOOOO THOSE ARE *MY* PIXELS I DIDN'T SAY YOU CAN LOOK AT THEM NOOOOOOO REEEEEEEEE!!!
▶ No.57980
>>57515
What about rating:e?
▶ No.58009>>58022
>>57921
>cuckold
His wife cheating on him is not the same thing as watching them fuck, with or without agreement. Also nice dodging the fact that you did make an ad hominem; arguments are to be made on the basis of the argument, not who makes the argument: The sky is blue holds true just as much whether a climatologist makes it or Hitler himself states it. Lrn2logic.
>>57945
This guy gets it.
▶ No.58022>>58039
>>58009
>a man knowingly letting his wife get fucked is not a cuckold
uh huh
▶ No.58039>>58047 >>58056 >>58057
>>58022
>knowingly
Uh, he wasn't aware of it? And again, that still doesn't refute his philosophy. You're like the SJWs who claim white men are wrong about everything because they're white males, or /pol/ when they claim jews are wrong about everything because they're jews. (Also Hitler couldn't develop nukes because he rejected the theory of relativity, invented by Einstein, a jew. lol.)
So yeah, feel free to stop being a faggot anytime.
▶ No.58047>>58058
>>58039
Being aware of being cucked or unaware of it are just two sides of the same coin.
▶ No.58056>>58058
>>58039
He was aware of it actually.
Sorry your hero let other men fuck his wife.
▶ No.58057>>58059
>>58039
Actually, the people on /pol/ believe that Einstein was a total fraud that somehow stole all his work from some white men went unrecorded in history, because he was very good at being Jewish.
So there's that.
▶ No.58058
>>58047
No it's not.
>>58056
Nothing I ever heard of. Still, it doesn't matter. His philosophy is top stuff and I suggest you read him sometime.
▶ No.58059>>58061
>>58057
What the fuck am I reading?
▶ No.58061>>58063
>>58059
It's how you think when you've been "red-pilled".
▶ No.58063>>58064 >>58065
>>58061
I've been wondering: do you think people become retarded by going to /pol/, or do people go to /pol/ because they're retarded?
▶ No.58064>>58066
>>58063
>I've been wondering: do you think people become retarded by going to /leftpol/, or do people go to /leftpol/ because they're retarded?
I think it's little bit of both
▶ No.58065>>58067
>>58063
More the first. They might go there and be only slightly retarded, but if they stay (and believe what they hear) they will become extremely retarded. Have you seen how many hundreds of infographics they have, that "prove" how inferior black people are? It's incredible. Next to that, believing that it's impossible for a Jew to accomplish anything isn't much of a stretch.
They think Jews are a race, too, by the way. I can change my race just by converting! It'll even make my nose grow.
▶ No.58066
>>58064
Don't be an idiot. /leftpol/ > /pol/
▶ No.58067
>>58065
yeah and those retards honestly think antifa is funded by george soros and that he's a communist, even though he spent millions to groups to dissolve the USSR.
▶ No.58080>>58087 >>58090
>furfags aren't leftist cance-
▶ No.58087
>>58080
Wait, why did this guy get cut off? I don't think he said Candlejack, so it doesn't make any sen
▶ No.58090
>>58080
If you're a rightfag and /pol/ you should honestly just kill yourself. If the nazifags take over they're going to kill you.
▶ No.58160>>58255
>>57707
People no longer invoke logical fallacies to guide an argument to a place of objective understanding. They're basically pokemon that people throw at each other to see who can get the biggest chain combo of citing named fallacies and "win" the debate.
>>57684
I honestly can't wait for the eventual complete inability to enforce the concept to kill the IP meme for good.
>>57671
Funny you cry "libtard" when the most rabid and savage defenders of muh copyright muh DNP I've ever seen among furries are all left-wingers, even if they're socialist as fuck on literally every other economic question.
▶ No.58253>>58254
>It's a pokemon image
>With a creepy comment by Eduymario
▶ No.58254
>>58253
>eduymario isn't banned for creepy comments yet
>literal thousands are
▶ No.58255>>58256 >>58342 >>58344
>>58160
Right-wonkos only defend property rights when it's the most powerful people's property. They don't even fight for their own property rights, which is why they let themselves be cucked by a tiny minority of literal soyboys who mostly just inherited their vast corporate empires from their daddies and mommies.
▶ No.58256>>58288
>>58255
Left-wonkos only defend LGBT when it's the most convenient. They don't even fight for class based issues anymore, which is why they let themselves be cucked by the religion of peace when it inconveniently mows them down in Orlando night clubs and breaks the narrative of "why are the minorities I protect trying to kill each other, fuck drumpf, and fuck having borders and shit".
see I can construct strawmen too.
▶ No.58266>>58377 >>58414
I think these are the tamest reasons I've ever seen someone getting banned for.
https://e621.net/user_record?user_id=18982
▶ No.58270>>58272
Why are some artists having a lot of their artwork removed? I remember Guoh specifically having a couple pages to browse through but now there's barely one.
▶ No.58272>>58274
>>58270
Probably because of their new DNP rules, which is basically "Anything that has ever been DNP is forever DNP because we believe an image archive is most effective when you can't archive anything."
▶ No.58274
>>58272
Are there any other sites that still retain a large amount of content and artists like e621 did? That was a huge bonus and probably my favorite thing about it, not having to look through tons of sites to find an artist or types of art you like.
▶ No.58288
>>58256
>liberals are leftists
Are you a burger?
▶ No.58342
>>58255
>IP is anything like real and physical property and deserves the same respect.
>Implying I give any more fucks about Disney and their eternal trademark on Mickey Mouse.
▶ No.58344
>>58255
"Whoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property. What I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing. I do not step shyly back from your property, but look upon it always as my property, in which I respect nothing. Pray do the like with what you call my property!"
▶ No.58377
>>58266
Mods have to justify their position and validate themselves some way or another, it's just like police and hitting that quota
▶ No.58383>>58392
>it's another thread where faggots cry about /pol/ and misrepresent everything about it
Reeks of desperation tbh
▶ No.58392
>>58383
Sometimes I have the feeling there are times where in desperation, people go to other places to lure the worst scum here, even thought hey won't contribute.
▶ No.58414>>58427 >>58432 >>58435 >>58437 >>58447
>>58266
Ratte kills another one. Thing is, it's not like this guy was a repeat offender. He left a grand total of four "creepy comments" over the course of 18 months, and his last "offense" was 10 fucking months ago.
This has got to stop. What can we do? Together we are legion; we could literally have her killed, come on.
▶ No.58427>>58440
>>58414
>creepy comments
>on a site who's entire purpose is porn
Every day people find a new and inventive way for me to hate them.
▶ No.58432
>>58414
>her
found the problem
once you let cunts into anything they and their enablers will ruin it with pointless drama, there are no exceptions.
▶ No.58435
>>58414
Ratte literally admits to letting out stress by banning people on e621 and bending the rules as far as possible in order to find reasons to ban users, and the admin team is either whipped, cucked or too beta to do anything but either say nothing, defend ratte or parade ratte's "awesomeness" everywhere. Ratte is also more egotistical than jasonafex, prince vaxis, and 0r0 combined so there's another problem there. Varka might own e621 but ratte rules it with an iron pussy
▶ No.58437>>58440
>>58414
Ratte fucking banned me for shit she dug through my private messages for. Fuck that god damned hoe.
I'm only not that mad about it because the person I spent all my time calling out finally fucking got the ban stick for their thirtieth comment on equine pictures about how much stallion cock they take.
▶ No.58440>>58449 >>58629
>>58427
To be fair, some people tend to comment really disgusting crap and it often seems like it's 12 year olds who don't have a clue.
It's like when you have a loli thread and everyone describes in detail what they wish they could do IRL. Yuck.
I know it's double standards but man, reading the shit other people write can really piss you off. Says the social media management guy.
>>58437
Yeah this is a fine example of shitposting. My theory is that can't be an adult, no adult posts such shit comments about horse cock taking pride. I think everyone under 18 should have a secluded internet where they can wither and die.
▶ No.58447>>58460
>>58414
Yeah, the stupidest thing is her "This will affect all of your accounts."
Bitch, its called VPNs and alt accounts, just try to find them.
▶ No.58449
>>58440
Oh, I absolutely agree that they should remove comments that are obviously references to things done in real life. That's serious slippery-slope when you start talking about having sex with animals, or little kids, for real. That's the kind of thing that make the feds start looking your way, and as a website owner/moderator hosting material of questionable legality because the world is a bunch of fucking retards, that's bad news. But the comments that I've always gotten hit for (and others I've seen) are of the fictional/fantastical/hypothetical "I would like to...", "I wish...", "I want..." or whatever.
The thing about Ratte that pisses me off is that it seems she will ONLY do this with gay stuff, because she has a violent hatred of anyone who likes it. Last time it happened to me, it was a comment that got 27 upvotes; clearly the USERS approve of the fucking comment, so why should a mod have primacy over that? It's bullshit.
▶ No.58460>>58486
>>58447
lmao ratte is one dumb ass bitch she think she banned me permanently like five times by now lol
▶ No.58486>>58663
>>58460
There's nothing preventing you from just making another account. Partially, I think that's why they do it so casually. Same as handing out two-day bans on an imageboard like handing out Halloween candy. It's really just a minor inconvenience, so they treat it as one.
▶ No.58620
Honestly if they wanted to make bans mean something on e621, they would disable your blacklist on the banned account.
▶ No.58629>>58641
>>58440
The fuck are you redditspacing for?
▶ No.58641>>58665
>>58629
The fuck are you not contributing for?
Formats really trigger you that much?
▶ No.58663
>>58486
From how they write it i believe they Really think that banning someone is permanent, they are THAT stupid
I can count on my fingers how many people more ignorant then them exist on the net
▶ No.58665
>>58641
It does make you look like an insufferable faggot.
'Least E621 failures stay on E621.