/fur/ - Furry★

>>58048

While looking for Tenma videos for future drawing reference, I realized he used scenes where a human transforms into an animal with boobs quite often in movies. It's kinda weird, even though it might be true to the source material (and maybe to show off animation-wise).

Also, there was a movie with a sexy shapeshifting blob that in the end transforms into a girl because the human main character doesn't get the damsel in distress at the end.

Tons of really weird fetish things.

The female animals also act very flirty overall.

Still, that guy was a genius.

>>58077

He was a dirty furry who could [i]actually write stories worth a damn[/i] (even though, given the number, many of them weren't that great).

>>58048

>all that ass

The man had truly patrician tastes.

>>58151

No, most of his work sucked, but it was imaginative and artsy. That's way more than you can expect from anime nowadays, where Kemono Friends becomes anime of the year.

>>58213

>No, most of his work sucked

You can believe that if you want.

>>58048

Does there exist an uncensored version of the mouse in the lower right corner? I know he drew it as a gift for friends, I think on a greeting card, so I don't think he added the bar.

>>58326

>1989

>furries weren't even a thing

Not online, sure, but conventions and independent comics already existed.

>>58343

Oh you know what i mean... Like the first ever furry convention was in Jan 1989 and only 65 people showed up according to wikifur. Tezuka would've already been on his death bed at the time. I strongly doubt he was aware of the existence of furries.

>>58362

And the first comic-con was in 1970. Does that mean that nobody was aware that people were reading comics before then? Don't be ridiculous.

>>58367

Comic-con isn't a furry convention, it's about comics like Batman and Dick Tracy. You won't find dedicated booths with erotic fursmut there...

>>58413

You missed my point ENTIRELY. I won't even bother explaining it; figure that out yourself, idiot.

>>58415

What was the point? That we've had furry art since caveman times? Whoopty-doo.

>>58418

>There were no such thing as furries before the 90's

>Nothing significant ever happened in the world before I was born!

Uh huh.

>>58455

>Furries

>Significant

>>58461

>you

>not obtuse

I'm not familiar with any (if there is any) Tezuka's work about furries. Doctors and robots take enough reading time. Got any titles to chase? He sure put out a lot of smaller works, like that one with the invisible woman.

>>67792

Is this Greece?

Because of all the artifacts.