Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdfMax filesize is 16 MB.Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.
File (hide): a54a4de50ceca87⋯.jpeg (865.27 KB, 771x1035, 257:345, fab3716-applejack02.jpeg) (h) (u)
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 07:16:38 No.57130>>57159 >>57169 >>62139 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
>body is highly detailed, shaded and super anatomically accurate
>head and other new parts are flat and drawn poorly
I would guess someone's tracing porn pics to get the bodies. They have much of the same in their gallery of this type of art.
http://www.sofurry.com/view/1275696
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 07:22:47 No.57131>>57132
This isn't furry; what the fuck are you doing?
▶ Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 07:33:09 No.57132>>57135 >>57155
>>57131
>Someone draws a pokemon gijinka
>It's literally some barashit human male with a jacket that vaguely has the same colors as a pokemon
>Shows up as a pokemon picture on FA/e621
<But somehow MLP isn't furry
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 08:38:45 No.57135
>>57132
Gijinka usually aren't furry, either. It can be if the character ends up as a kemonomimi, but this MLP character is not in the least bit. She has ZERO animal traits.
Go jump off a bridge. Cloppers aren't welcome here anyway.
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 15:18:08 No.57155>>57156
>poor tagging means its furry
GTFO ponyfag, back to your ilk
>>>/mlp/
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 16:02:42 No.57156>>57157
>>57155
haven't seen anyone this triggered since the last time /pol/ got offended by the existence of back people
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 16:08:52 No.57157
>>57156
>disagreeing with me means ur triggered XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 16:31:55 No.57159
>>57130 (OP)
Doesn't look traced or detailed to me, just a lack of anatomy knowledge.
▶Anonymous 12/16/17 (Sat) 19:40:43 No.57169>>57194
But why do you even care about this shitty non-fur artist? Maybe you'd have a better case if you found someone charging $200+ for pictures that they traced, or some of those cub-artists who have a creepily realistic style.
▶Anonymous 12/17/17 (Sun) 06:38:07 No.57194>>57203
>>57169
>some of those cub-artists who have a creepily realistic style
Like who?? Cub as a rule can't be realistic because they're literally covered in fur and shit.
▶Anonymous 12/17/17 (Sun) 13:23:28 No.57203
>>57194
>and shit
▶Anonymous 02/03/18 (Sat) 11:15:04 No.62139
>first exposure to fa(g)b
>being this newfag
Fam I....