[–]▶ No.53564>>53591 >>53600 >>53804 >>54184 >>54190 >>54290 >>54497 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
>paw pads/dog paws
>on a reptile/dragon
>furfags actually defending this shit and claiming it as "valid anatomy"
>mfw
▶ No.53591>>53611 >>54429
>>53564 (OP)
Maybe it's my more /tg/-tier nature about furstuff, but hair absolutely drives me up the fucking wall. I see hair, I'm instantly turned off.
Fur manipulation is fine. Feathers are really easy in this regard. But actual hair just pisses me off, looks like someone threw on a cheap wig.
▶ No.53600>>53611
>>53564 (OP)
I am normally for the "it is an imaginary creature that never existed in the first place so all anatomy is valid" argument, especially for shit like birds with normal dicks instead of cloacas, but paw pads on a reptile are the work of Satan.
▶ No.53602>>53611
>Plantigrade but only has pads on the toes
Expect to see a lot more of this bullshit now that Zootopia did it.
▶ No.53611>>53714
>>53591
I fully agree with you. Feathers are perfectly fine and anatomically correct either on a reptile or avian, but hair is just so wrong. Whenever I see hair on either, it makes it look far too human and irks me off pretty badly. People actually think it looks good which is just sad.
>>53602
I am seeing this everywhere lately and I understand.
>>53600
I get the imaginary creature shit, but dragons are reptiles which is what most furfags forget. They do not have paws/pads. The only instance where it would be acceptable is if it was a dog/cat hybrid.
Speaking of which: http://www.dreslough.com/main/paws/FOREPAWS.HTM
>"physically, all designs are perfectly plausible"
>she literally says cat and dog feet are anatomically correct
I'm really into reptile biology and you can see why this got my my jimmies rustled.
▶ No.53614>>53617 >>53632 >>53637
I like pads on reptile feet because they would probably feel nicer on my penis than just plain scales
▶ No.53617>>53618
>>53614
Why don't you just have a sparkledog fur do it instead? Pads are so fucking wrong on a reptile.
▶ No.53618
>>53617
Well before this thread I didn't have an answer but I do have one now: to make people like you angry
▶ No.53629
I get literally triggered when somebody draws human style hands with pads on them, with like 3 pads on each finger
▶ No.53632>>53637
>>53614
Confirmed for never having felt scales.
Scales > shitpads
▶ No.53637>>53670 >>55084
>>53632
>>53614
I read somewhere that dog pads are really hard and that they can scratch you akin to sandpaper if the dog moves it's paw too fast or something. Is that true? Also agreed scales>pads. I'll say it again: pads on a reptile/dragon are objectively wrong and if you like it, you have shit taste. If you want something with pads, go and fuck a dog.
▶ No.53641>>53644 >>53645
>not realizing that paws of SOME variety are necessary to walk comfortably and """real""" reptile humanoids would have something like that
Imagine having zero soft material on your feet. Imagine stepping with that.
▶ No.53643
>>53640
I h8 that sheet 2. THIS is a fucking focks.
▶ No.53644>>53650
>>53641
Humans don't have pawpads, you faggot.
Your lizard is shit, due to the cancerous spinach hair.
▶ No.53645>>53650
>>53641
That's objectively wrong. Humans don't have them, dinosaurs, birds, lizards whatever. Do you think they are uncomfortable when walking? Neither of them have paw pads because they do not need them. There is no logical reason to put them on a reptilian/avian anthro unless gryphon. Also that picture is shit.
▶ No.53646>>53647
Nothing irks me more than people who say a anime girl with [insert animal species] ears, makes them that animal.
Just searching on e621 for something like foxes and getting some dumb anime chick with fox ears and a tail and people defend that as valid to have the 'fox' tag.
▶ No.53647>>62718
>>53646
It's kind of funny to see that there are so many same-faced anorexic 12 year old anime girls that animefags have to resort to giving them animal features to make them even slightly more unique while going through the mental gymnastics of "I-I'm not a filthy dog fucker like those furry fucks, I only like SOME animal parts"
▶ No.53650>>53651 >>53664
>>53645
>>53644
A bit of soft tissue under the skin to soften the impact. Explicitly said SOME VARIETY, not necessarily pads.
▶ No.53651>>53655
>>53650
Won't deny that because it's true with some reptiles, but most furfaggot "artists" draw the padding identical to that of a canine which does look very wrong.
▶ No.53652>>53653 >>53808
>sharks with dog ears
Who started this?
▶ No.53653>>53746
>>53652
Furfags + tumblr furfags trying to be "unique". Good luck trying to find a true shark anthro out of the thousands of shit doggy ones
▶ No.53655>>53656
>>53651
Well, the sheer amount of furfags who like drawing DOG pads specifically really makes you think......
▶ No.53656>>53661
This is what humanity deems a "shark" nowadays.
>>53655
I have nothing against pads if they are drawn on an animal that has them, but reptiles do not have paw pads and they look like utter shit with them (see human hair on reptiles). It's like drawing a beak on a monkey.
▶ No.53661>>53663
>>53656
Why do you have that saved?
▶ No.53663>>54380
>>53661
found it while browsing ed forums
▶ No.53664
>>53650
Tougher flesh where one walks is normal. Tougher flesh where one walks and paw pads are not one in the same, you gook.
▶ No.53670>>53682 >>55084
>>53637
Depends on the age and activity level of the dog in question. But they are not at all like the pads of a cat; they have a structure akin to many bundled columns of hard, almost keratinized tissue, that have a tendency to separate and flare out a tiny bit at the edges. They can be about as rough as very course-grit sandpaper on an older dog that doesn't spend all day walking on carpet and grass.
This is also why the people who have mentioned the disparity between pawpads and what reptiles or humans have are correct. Calluses are reactive and transient areas of hard tissue layered horizontally; pads are purpose-designed permanent structures layered vertically.
▶ No.53682
>>53670
That's some impressive biological knowledge, anon. At least someone here pays attention to biology.
▶ No.53693>>53694 >>53707
▶ No.53694>>53707
>>53693
U & everypony else.
▶ No.53707>>53733
>>53694
>pony
>paws
what would the horsefuckers think?
>>53693
>t. bui
▶ No.53714>>53716 >>53728
>>53611
>Dragons are reptiles
Dragons are whatever people want them to be. They can be mammals with reptillian traits and vice versa. They can be space aliens from the -34th dimension and made of vectors. They can look fucking human with no changes whatsoever outside of breathing fire or something.
As dumb as you may think it is dragons are a fantasy creature and thus can be rather flexible with their design and anatomy. Granted dragons come with a certain expectation so if they veer too far off into the weird you start to wonder if they're dragons at all which is understandable for a lot of people.
▶ No.53716>>54118
>>53714
>>dragons are mammals
>always depicted laying eggs
>always looks reptilian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon
They're akin to dinosaurs. Thank me later.
▶ No.53728>>53734
>>53714
You aren't entirely wrong, much like kobolds can be tiny germanic elves. But the main bulk of the presentation for dragons is reptilian.
Fur dog-dragon trash is still complete cancerous trash, in any case.
▶ No.53733>>58879
>>53707
I wanted to use "pony" in my post as a joke, but it seems internet is not capable of detecting that.
▶ No.53734
>>53728
I like this example a lot.
▶ No.53742>>53743 >>53744
>Dragons with paws
Shit.
>Kobolds are dragons
Shit.
>Some faggot-ass dragon OC screwing a random famous character
Fucking kill me.
▶ No.53743
>>53742
Kobolds are lizardfolk. Yes, dragons with paws are shit and fucking wrong. I can't help but think why furfag "artists" won't draw their feet like a reptilian/saurian is because they don't know how to. Years of drawing sparkledogs might have something to do with that so they just go with doggy pawsies because dog anatomy is all they really know.
▶ No.53744
>>53742
Kobolds are dragonoids, but not true dragons. Even wyverns are closer than they are.
Effectively they're engineered to be draconic slaves, serving every whim of desire of their true dragon masters.
▶ No.53746>>53748
>>53653
>sharks with dog ears
>tumblr
Retard
▶ No.53748>>53791
>>53746
>sharks with dog ears
>not tumblr
mmm.. all those genderfluid tranny artists on furaffinity and tumblr who draw those abominations say otherwise, fag.
▶ No.53791>>53812
>>53748
Sharks with dog ears have been around before tumblr caught wind of them, faggot.
▶ No.53804>>53813
>>53564 (OP)
dragons are magical creatures at this point, getting pissed cause they have pads is retarded. also, some dinosaurs are speculated to have padded feet as well
▶ No.53808>>63745
>>53652
Renard popularized it.
▶ No.53812>>53827 >>54300
>>53791
>defending tumblr
You have to go back. Kill yourself, faggot.
▶ No.53813
>>53804
>getting pissed at dog anatomy being applied to a reptile/dragon is retarded
It isn't. Regardless if that's true or not, their "pads" wouldn't look like that of a canine like many artists interpret it.
▶ No.53827>>54060 >>54098
>>53812
>Anime smug
Why isn't this bullshit an instant fucking ban yet?
▶ No.54060>>54062
>>53827
It triggers the normalfags that somehow get in.
▶ No.54062>>54066
>>54060
Anime IS for normalfags, you mouthbreather.
▶ No.54066
▶ No.54098>>54109 >>54139
>>53827
if you're triggered by anime girls, you shouldn't be on this site.
▶ No.54109>>54117 >>54140 >>62330
>>54098
No buddy, I think you're the one who's in the wrong neighborhood.
The weebscum echo chamber is that way >>>/4chan/
▶ No.54117>>54125
>>54109
>he gets this triggered over animu smug
nah. you're on the wrong site, fag. have another :^)
▶ No.54118>>54119 >>54120
>>53716
I honestly could care less. Dragons are magical beings with many ties to mythological history across the world. Nothing is stopping a person from putting their own spin on creatures that are pretty much magical. Same with elves, same with dwarves, and so on. Arguing facts, and logic about a mythological creature just means you want your dragons a particular way and don't like it when people put a spin on it. And I can sympathize with that. I hate it when anime has to make 'dragons' literally elve or human all the goddamn time.
▶ No.54119
>>54118
Still, I think we can all agree that tall dwarves, or bearded industrial elves is gay.
Same deal for dogdragons.
▶ No.54120>>55440
>>54118
Dragons were never depicted with doglike features in mythology. That's my argument and it's valid.
▶ No.54125>>54126 >>54127 >>54134 >>54140
>>54117
Ah yes, the famed "I'm totally not cringing in the corner crying like a little bitch because you won't let fullchan be like cuckchan where every board is just a clone of /a/ and bans are handed out to everyone who isn't okay with weebs being spergs"
Here's some advice: if you wanna delude yourself and/or your weeb friends that anybody here cares about your chink toons or your underage love interests and subsequent paedophilic tendencies on any board other than /a/, start samefagging.
▶ No.54127>>54325 >>55105
>>54125
Look, I hate anime smug too, but fucking hell, there's a limit mate.
This is just grade A autism.
Point to where anime touched you on the doll.
▶ No.54134>>54140
>>54125
It's not even about all of that. It's "I don't have any sort of argument, so here's an image macro that I got from reddit or halfchan; and after I've posted it everyone will think I'm hot shit and forget the original argument".
It's like saying that someone who get dubs or trips automatically wins an argument. All antiquated bullshit from a bunch of retard children who can't actually argue, so they invent meme Calvinball rules that enable them to win by doing literally nothing. Imageboard culture is a cancer on everything it touches.
▶ No.54139>>54140 >>54169 >>62330
>>54098
Back to 4chan, a cansorus place where you should stay.
▶ No.54140>>54141 >>54158
>>54139
>>54134
>>54125
>>54109
nice samefagging. why do you hate anime so much?
▶ No.54141>>54429 >>55105
>>54140
An anime loli molested him when he was young. Don't judge him too much, anon.
▶ No.54146
▶ No.54149>>54152
>>53807
snakes have cute faces, ok
▶ No.54152>>54153 >>54390
>>54149
True, but a snake with legs is just a lizard.
▶ No.54153>>54155
>>54152
but their faces are distinct, nerd
▶ No.54155
>>54153
True, but not that distinct. Especially when drawn by a furry.
Look, giving them arms is one thing. But legs?
▶ No.54158>>54160
>>54140
Calling "samefag" is just another way to prove you don't have any argument and are, in fact, a complete retard.
▶ No.54160>>54183
>>54158
>he took this long to respond
>he was doing a shitty shoop/firebug edit this whole time
>he is still this asshurt
Have another smug animu grill :^)
▶ No.54169
>>54139
How is it any worse than 8chan x-actly?
▶ No.54183>>54185
>>54160
Oh yes, you're so right. I shooped it. Here's the original.
▶ No.54184
>>53564 (OP)
>paw pads/dog paws
This but on aquatic species like sharks
▶ No.54185>>54189
>>54183
>being this fucking autistic and trying to defend an obvious shop edit
Have another :^)
▶ No.54189
>>54185
>He's an anime smug machine
Impressive.
▶ No.54190>>54240 >>54246
>>53564 (OP)
>>brags about the anatomy of an imaginary non existent creature that is pure fantasy and will probably NEVER EXIST
>This is some serious OCD
▶ No.54240
>>54190
>dragons are acshully dogs guise. im srs i cant apply decent anatomy so i draw all my dragonz liek doggies n shiet
▶ No.54246
>>54190
Look, do what you want, but it's still cancerous.
I prefer more beastlike girls, anyhow.
▶ No.54290>>54293
>>53564 (OP)
Why are you complaining about this? Dog paws and pads look great on everything, especially dragons. That's why everyone puts them on their characters.
▶ No.54293>>54299 >>54308 >>54336
>>54290
Because "looks great" is subjective, and besides, shouldn't be the basis of a character.
This mentality is why so much of furshit is complete and utter trash.
You've got no care around actually making a character. You just want to make something aesthetically pleasing. You're building your characters backwards.
▶ No.54299
>>54293
>This mentality is why so much of furshit is complete and utter trash
It's ironic, because for the most part furry OCs look like shit even though their creator is focusing on the aesthetics over all else.
▶ No.54300
>>53812
I'm not defending tumblr. Just admit you're wrong, nigger
▶ No.54308>>54335
>>54293
>Because "looks great" is subjective, and besides, shouldn't be the basis of a character
I'm sorry, WHAT? Why would I want to draw a character if I didn't like the way it looked?
▶ No.54325>>54335
>>54127
I want to see her collection and her cloaca.
▶ No.54335>>54452 >>55105
>>54308
You give a character appearance after you give it character, anon. You can make it look good after having figured out what sort of person the character's going to be. If you just go straight to appearance, it'll look like shit, because it is a non-person. It has no character. It was just designed to look pretty. It's an empty husk, like some kind of doll.
I'd make the argument that character-first designs always end up looking better, anyway.
>>54325
▶ No.54336>>54337
>>54293
Well, you are wrong there. Dog paws and pads actually look objectively better on most characters including reptiles and dragons. Why do you think everyone puts them on everything? Because they are easy to draw, cute, and fitting whilst being a paw with pads which is iconic to the furry fandom. The anatomyfags and the retards complaining about paws and pads in this thread have shit taste.
▶ No.54337>>54367
>>54336
Because furries are autistic shitheads who don't know how to draw anything beyond a dog, most the time.
They do not look better. They look quite a huge fucking load worse.
▶ No.54367>>54368
>>54337
Do they really look better? I prefer paws myself. Reptilian feet are pretty ugly and dragons are better with canine esque paws.
▶ No.54368>>54372
>>54367
Yes. Paw pads ruin the aesthetics of a nice set of claws.
Dog-footed dragons are trash. Lizard feet are fine. You want to jerk it to dogs? Fine. Go draw a dog.
▶ No.54372>>54373
>>54368
How do you even find those appealing? A set of paws on that dragon would look so much better. Cute pads, four short toes. Better than the shit that is on her. I don't care that it's a dragon. Paws are more fitting.
▶ No.54373
>>54372
That's because you're a degenerate dumpsterfire with no standards or tastes.
Paws are trash. If you really want a paw pad, fap to dogs, not dragons.
▶ No.54380
>>53663
Why are people posting furry porn to a forum dedicated to erectile dysfunction?
Isn't that cruel?
▶ No.54390>>54404
>>54152
No, a snake with legs is a snake with legs and a lizard without legs is a lizard without legs.
▶ No.54404
>>54390
Problem is, lack of legs is what makes the snek a snek.
You might as well be making a furred lizard. Or a hydra with one head.
▶ No.54408>>54410
>people who say they like the things that other people don't like just to start shit
▶ No.54410
>>54408
This is the internet. Start as much shit as you want. I'm going to call you out when you're objectively wrong, like this 'paw pad' guy, though.
▶ No.54420>>54423 >>62147
>>53586
>bombing a furry convention
>with chlorine gas
how the hell did that happen?
and did that fuckwit got caught yet
▶ No.54423>>54444 >>58880 >>62147
>>54420
>how the hell did that happen?
Some jackass dumped a fuckload of chlorine salt in a stairwell and it spread throughout the building. It wasn't just con goers who got sick, but also regular hotel guests & staff. Luckily, nobody died
>did that fuckwit got caught yet
Sadly not. Police say the lack of witnesses is making this a difficult case to investigate as no one claims to have seen him or her.
▶ No.54429>>54443 >>54445 >>54452
>>53591
It depends on the art style, lackadaisy pulls off anthro cats with hair fine. I think the real problem is making it look good on male characters.
>>54141
Is there more? sauce?
▶ No.54443
▶ No.54444
▶ No.54445
>>54429
Most of those cats have no hair, and the ones that do suffer from rampant wighair.
▶ No.54452>>54453 >>55109
>>54429
The male cats do have hair, it's just always short, and tend to be same colour.
>>54335
WHERE IS THAT COMIC COMING FROM?? IT IS PERFECT!
▶ No.54453>>55109
>>54452
I got it from e621.
Had to search up the dragon's name, mind. Though, I do rather love that name, for some reason.
https://e621.net/post/show/1249556/-anus-being_watched-bestiality-cave-dragon-duo-ere
▶ No.54497>>54503 >>54515 >>62718
>>53564 (OP)
>male anthro
>human penis
Human dicks belong on humans only. It pisses me off when an otherwise good drawing has a human dick on a furry, especially if the shaft is covered in fur.
▶ No.54503
>dinosaurs with their genitals going through the belly ribs or pelvic bone, also no cloaca
Come on even statues of dinosaurs have cloacae for fucks sake.
>nagas with genitals on their stomach
Even worse that you hardly ever see this on any form of taur. Regular snakes are prone to this treatment too.
>vertical double dicks or hemipenes
Often comes along with the above. Way to show that you have no grasp on basic body anatomy.
>a knot on anything but a canine
Partially agree with >>54497 hairy dick is disgusting no matter how you slice it.
▶ No.54514>>54516
>all these faggots in this thread complaining about anatomy whilst having utter shit taste
Paws and pads are great on dragons and reptiles, you tasteless shits. Dragons are fantasy beasts. Why would you not give them paws? There is no excuse. Paws are superior and more fitting than claws on a dragon. Besides, Dragons have a mammalian skeleton.
▶ No.54515>>54531 >>55424 >>55457
>>54497
>the anthros fur is drawn like skin
>it has a human dick
>it's circumsized
The unholy trinity of a shit OC.
I can deal with human dicks but for gods sake don't make it a jewdick
▶ No.54516>>54584
>>54514
No.
You and your paw pads are cancer.
You want shit pads, go fap to a dog.
▶ No.54531
>>54515
People draw what's easier to draw you know...
and then they get stupid rich on Patreon for nothing.
▶ No.54584>>54598
▶ No.54598>>54628 >>54685 >>54688
>>54584
Claws > the dirt > shitpaws
▶ No.54628
▶ No.54685
>>54598
god your taste is shit. sorry that most scalies prefer paws over shit "muh realism" claws
▶ No.54688>>54703
>>54598
You have posted a dragon NOT with cloaca.
Expect shitstorm.
▶ No.54703>>55463
>>54688
It's got a single slit. I think that's probably a cloaca.
▶ No.55084
>>53637
>>53670
I think it also depends on the time of year. My dog's pads crack a bit during the winter.
▶ No.55105>>55109
▶ No.55109>>55463
>>54452
>>54453
>>55105
i just found it, the comic is called trash knight but has no sex on it. Dissapointing
https://trashknight.tumblr.com/post/162634709097
▶ No.55257>>55269 >>55313
Do you mind showing sweat on a furry body?
▶ No.55269
>>55257
Just anime-style large beads on their fur? It makes no sense and looks stupid. It's possible to portray it like horse sweat (kind of a sheen on very short fur) but since most furry characters are drawn "shiny" to begin with, there is little difference to be had. That's a level of realism you can't expect.
▶ No.55272
You know what irks me? People with shitty taste like you, OP. Paws and pads are objectively better.
▶ No.55313
>>55257
It's a bit stupid, but I don't usually mind too much.
One of those cartoon aspects you just kind of accept with 2d drawings.
If it was on a really realistic item, I'd probably dislike it, though.
▶ No.55424>>55446 >>55457
>>54515
>jewdick
it might as well be called tradition dick down
▶ No.55440>>55442
>>54120
>never depicted with doglike features
>literally depicted with doglike ears, noses, paws, and fur...
You shut your whore bitch mouth.
▶ No.55442>>55464
>>55440
dog dragons>reptilian dragons
paws>claws
amirite?
▶ No.55446>>55457
>>55424
It's capitalismdick. The only reason it happens anymore is because doctors tell parents to have it done, and they obey because doctors are good people and wouldn't lie. The kid loses half the skin on their dick and most of his ability to feel pleasure, and the doctor is several thousand dollars richer, the hospital is several thousand dollars richer, the skin-care cream manufacturer is several thousand dollars richer, and the world keeps on spinning.
▶ No.55457>>55465 >>55497
>>55446
>>55424
>>54515
I don't get the complaints about cut dicks in general. Let it go and just don't do it to your kid.
▶ No.55463>>55470
>>55109
>disappointing
As if sex is the only thing in the world that's worth living for. Grow up.
>>54703
Well, looks like you did not look at that image more closely, cloacafag.
▶ No.55464>>55486
>>55442
I just hate the over simplified dragons being though of as "the correct dragons."
They're all Disneyfied-looking fucks with two spikes coming out behind their head and frill ears.
That's what all the beta fans in furry want to see and they bitch when artists want to draw dragons based off Actual Depictions of them throughout history. There's significantly more mamillian qualities to them than people care to think about.
▶ No.55465>>55467
▶ No.55467
>>55465
don't let ur cummies control u
▶ No.55470>>55479
>>55463
Explain, mate. I don't see it.
▶ No.55486
>>55464
dragons are actually mammals and a type of dog so you can draw paws on them. the wikipedia is wrong on how it says they are reptilian. furries always depict them like dogs so what are you complaining about?
▶ No.55497>>55518 >>55552
>>55457
Well, that's just the thing. If we accept that cut dicks are "normal" or "okay", then he will cave to the doctors. Every single time. You ask someone why they had their child cut, and it's always the same answer "I thought there wasn't a difference..." It's only through shaming them into the truth that they have inferior dicks, so they think about it and feel bad about it all the time, that they will actually choose not to inflict the same on their sons. If, by making one generation of men feel really, really bad about the state of their body, we can end this cycle of violence, it would be worth it.
>>55479
See pic related. That's not a cloaca. It's identical to human genitals, but on a dragon using a slit as a replacement for the outer labia.
▶ No.55518>>55532 >>59709
>>55497
Fair enough. It's still all in the same slit, but I don't know enough about cloacas to really say more on the lot.
▶ No.55532>>59707
>>55518
A cloaca is just one opening. It has many tubes leading into that opening, but they are deeper inside. You'd need a speculum to see them.
▶ No.55552>>55580
>>55497
>Your entire post.
▶ No.55580>>63746
>>55552
At least I HAVE a post, instead of just le ebin meme reaction webm. You think that shit is going to fly off of /pol/, you're sadly mistaken.
▶ No.55582>>58302 >>58315
enough of the cloaca shit. dragons are canines, not reptilian. paws and pads are perfectly acceptable and more biologically accurate than claws. dragons are mammals.
▶ No.58302>>58315
>>55582
Paws>Claws
Anyone who says otherwise is a massive faggot. Dragons look much better with paws. They're fantasy creatures too, so paws are objectively better.
▶ No.58315>>58328
>>55582
>>58302
Uh oh, the "dragons are mammals" guy made it over here, too. My posting one of the kobold drawings from D&D really ticked someone off.
▶ No.58328>>58371 >>58431
>>58315
Don't take too much credit, retard. Not even him. Besides, they do look better. Ever wonder why furry artists draw them onto dragons so much?
▶ No.58371
>>58328
>Ever wonder why furry artists draw them onto dragons so much?
Because the character that was commissioned is a dragon in name only.
▶ No.58378>>58396
>It's an eeveelution
>with perfectly human cock and balls, always of the exact same dimensions
>Eeveelutions are so fucking outrageously popular beyond all other pokemon that you're bound to see this shit break past even the most formidable blacklisting
This is why people shit on pokeporn all the time.
▶ No.58396>>58588 >>58740 >>58960
>>58378
>It's an eeveelution
>despite that canon clearly states 7/8th of them are male, about 90% will be a female because fuck your genetics, I'm straight!
▶ No.58431>>58452 >>58517
>>58328
AKA "I'm totally somebody different!"
▶ No.58452
>>58431
t. no arguments so he cries samefag
▶ No.58517>>58522 >>58645
>>58431
Says "Not even him," then basically, "but I echo his sentiments." If not samefag, similarfag.
▶ No.58522
>>58517
>t. clawfag
Paws are objectively better than claws. Especially when it comes to Dragons.
▶ No.58588>>58607 >>58610
>>58396
>Implying faggots don't always slap dicks onto Pokemon with the opposite gender ratio
>Implying faggots don't always slap dicks onto Pokemon that canonically cannot be male
Hypocrite
▶ No.58607
>>58588
but what if the teats were foreskinned
▶ No.58610
>>58588
There's much more straight art of Pokemon, anyway, so I don't know what you're complaining about.
▶ No.58645>>59005
>>58517
Imagine being such a blubbering autist that the concept of multiple people disagreeing with you scares the shit out of you.
▶ No.58740>>58926
>>58396
>pogeymon is feminine looking
>has 7/8 gender ratio
>artist draws it as female
<B-BUT MUH SEVEN EIGTHS!
<UR A FAGET FOR LIKING GIRLS!
<REDRAW THIS WITH 7/8 OF A PENIS AND 1/8 OF A VAGINA!!
▶ No.58878>>59157 >>62183
This is more a hentai problem than a furry problem, but... I fucking hate when bodies look unrealistic in terms of proportions and general anatomy. I hate shit like tits that are the size of a beach ball, butts that look like balloons and/or have lots of unnatural stretchiness to them, thighs that look like they're double the size of the shoulder width, vaginas that have little to no depth and are colored a lot brighter than real vaginas (a bit of brightness is fine though)... like that shit is just fucking horrible. What's actually "sexy" is reimagining furry characters with realistic anatomy or that don't look like they have plastic surgery.
▶ No.58879
▶ No.58880
>>54423
omg it's the reaction image I requested being put to use
thanks to the anon who drew it and the anon who used it
▶ No.58926
>>58740
>polywog is slightly feminine looking
>artist draws it as a male
<NO! S-STOP DOING THAT!
<TH-THAT'S MY WAIFU!!
<THEY SHOULD ALL BE GIRLS!
Right back at you.
▶ No.58928>>59086
pussies also get put onto things that canonically cannot be female as well
▶ No.58960
>>58396
>Actually caring about made up fucking genetics
>Of a creature that is not only fake, but anthropomorphised so technically it's not even that fake species
▶ No.58967>>58975 >>58976 >>59031
>go on furaffinity
>search for "dragon"
>nearly every result has some form of canine feet, paws with pads etc or is literally a dog with wings
>someone draws a seemingly anatomically correct dragon
>fucks it up with doggy pawsie pads
What is the appeal of mammalian anatomy being applied to dragons again?
▶ No.58975
>>58967
They look cute and fuckable. Especially if the dragon is some big mean looking guy, it makes him a little cuter
▶ No.58976>>58997 >>59157
>>58967
You really need to stop complaining. Dragons DO have paws akin to canines/felines. They are not reptiles nor birds. They're directly related to canines and felines sharing an identical skeleton with digitigrade footpaws with 4 stubby digits again like dogs/cats. In fact, you would be the fucking idiot for NOT drawing them with paws in the first place. An anatomically correct dragon would have paws with pads. Dragons ARE mammals and not related to saurischia. They cannot be compared to dinosaurs, birds and reptiles and have more in common with pangolins, cats and dogs. A Wyvern however would be a saurischian.
Paws are everything in the furry/tumblr community and that is why dragons and gryphons are so popular, more so than foxes. Shitposting aside, they look objectively better.
▶ No.58997>>59005
>>58976
Are you the same retard of the kobold thread?
Dragons do not exist, as such their representation is always purely imagined and no way of properly say anatomically correct will ever apply, however in most culture dragons are represented as lizards and therefore reptilian
Reptilian creature DO NOT HAVE PADS by norm, nor any other typical mammalian feature, and before sperging about furred dragon remember, they do not exist and therefore i can imagine them how i want, like hybridized with an octopus with tentacle coming out of it's back
Your pathetic argument is not only invalid due to the not existent status of the species, it's completely stupid on a cultural standpoint as well, summing all up, fuck off retard
▶ No.59001>>59003
Now you can call me a cock slurping faggot but I'm not sure if the feet of a fictional species needs to have these kinds of arguments.
▶ No.59003
>>59001
Paws are iconic to the furry fandom and these arguments about anatomy are not uncommon.
▶ No.59005>>59064
>>58645
That's a scary thought! I'm glad I don't care who disagrees with me, and I'm relaxed about my opinions.
>>58997
I'm pretty sure he's the same guy. Got nothing against furdragons, and my bunbold has paws (because most of her external physiology is lapine) but dragons are-- straight out of mythology-- lizardy critters. But yeah, imagine them any way you want.
Here's an example. This has features I'm okay with (external testicles, humanoid penis, horns, clawed feet, wings) and ones I don't like on a dragon (ears, nipples). You, on the other hand, have a different set you like and don't? Do whatever you fuckin' want, it's fantasy. But the "objectively better" shitposting isn't generating any ragefits, so maybe it's time to try a new angle, mm?
▶ No.59031>>59039 >>59043
>>58967
I like tits and vagoos, sue me.
▶ No.59039>>59041
>>59031
So look at something that has tits then, instead of putting tits where they don't belong. Why is that so hard? Why do you expect the entire world and everything in it to cater to your feelings? 99% of furry characters have tits, but you still want them on the 1% that doesn't. You selfish fucking bastard.
▶ No.59041>>59043 >>59050
>>59039
My name is Not Important; what is important is what I'm going to do. I just fucking hate these breastless reptiles, and the human worms feasting on its cloaca. My whole life is just cold, bitter hatred, and I always wanted to ruin /tg/ lore violently. This is the time of vengeance, and no life is worth saving, and I will put the tits in as many non-mammal species as I can. It's time for me to ruin reptiles and it's time for me to draw; my genocide crusade begins... here!
▶ No.59043>>59044
>>59041
>I like tits and vagoos, sue me.
So do i, but it has nothing to do with dragons
>>59031
Bad game, bad quetes
▶ No.59044
>>59043
I'm going to coin "Rep(tit)le" now.
▶ No.59064>>59096
>>59005
Your snowflake rabbit is not a kobold. Stop flaunting it everywhere. It's shit.
▶ No.59065>>59068
>>59050
Absolutely and massively mammalian! Loving it!
▶ No.59067
>>59050
How do you even manage to have such horrible taste.
▶ No.59068>>59077
>>59050
>>59065
Don't forget those big, round highly visible paw pads with canine toes!!
▶ No.59077>>59081
>>59068
>canine toes
I don't know what kind of dogs YOU have, but...
▶ No.59081>>59096 >>59097 >>59111
>>59077
Just post dragons or reptiles with paws preferably with the pads visible. Triggers the OP and the other autistic shit taste fags in the thread. they're really lewd too c:
▶ No.59086
▶ No.59096>>59098
>>59064
So you say. At least I'm not on this "all dragons are mammals, paws with pads are objectively better" bullshit.
>>59050
To each their own, but ehhh.
>>59081
LOL not pads. To me, those are standard dragon feet with two colors. Pads are black or pink. But hey, if that's what floats yer boat...
▶ No.59097
>>59081
>that picture
Exquisite taste anon
▶ No.59098
>>59096
They're clearly paw pads. The feet are dragon-like but with seperate round pads on each digit with a canine-esque pad below them. Reptiles can have foot pads but they look different. Since most furries draw dragons with mammalian pads/paws, I guess they would fall under your definition of "standard".
▶ No.59111>>59113
>>59081
You are the only gay fag with autistic view here, you are the retard that try at all cost to push lizard creatures with completely nonsensical and inexplicable mammalian feature, in retaliation i am posting an obvious mammal to trigger the little retarded insane chimeric lover lodging in your head
▶ No.59113>>59115
>>59111
>this whole post
Are you actually autistic?
▶ No.59115>>59117
>>59113
Since we're all talking about the anatomy of a fictional creature, it's safe to say that we're all on the spectrum buddy.
▶ No.59117
>>59115
Where's my autism bux then. I have dildos to buy and then then shove up my fat hairy ass
▶ No.59127>>59128 >>59142 >>59719
>haha hey check out this badass female with/next to a gun/sports car/riced up vehicle
>any/all comments are splerging over the gun(s) and vehicle(s) because it's the normalfag equivalent of spamming the 'it's super effective!' joke on every picture of 2 pokemon fucking
>omg she's so hot i'd love to get shot by her mmrrrrwwwlll~ X3
>wtf this stupid fucking bitch doing get her the fuck off of the vehicle dumb fucking whore should be executed for even touching that bugatti chiron let alone existing too close near it i'd kill that bitch myself with my bare hands if i owned that
no other place worth putting this
▶ No.59128>>59130 >>59132 >>59142
>>59127
Don't forget the part where the pics get dozens of comments and by the end of the comment chain you have people who've since linked their collections of guns/dream vehicle(s) and have now concluded their sudden circlejerk by stating publically that they shared contact info privately, presumably to no doubt meet up and rub cocks together or against their guns and see who cums first
▶ No.59130
▶ No.59132
>>59128
>presumably to no doubt meet up and rub cocks together or against their guns and see who blows their nuts off first because they have poor trigger discipline
More like it.
▶ No.59142>>59145
>>59127
>>59128
what are ur fav firearms homie? Mine are the Walther P99 and Steyr AUG.
▶ No.59145>>59155 >>59157
>>59142
The one you kill yourself with. Call me edgy like I'm going to care.
▶ No.59153>>59163 >>59187
When people create the rare, not-sparkledog level of autism species and 'close' it to the public. Typically done by artists who'll happily sell one!
Cause, yknow, thats totally how things work.
▶ No.59155
>>59145
I'm going to call you edgy like you're caring. WHAT NOW?
▶ No.59157
>>58878
Half of your complaints aren't that unrealistic, but many artists aren't skilled enough to pull it off properly
>>58976
Anon, "muh reelism" or not, paws look like shit on dragons.
>>59145
Pic related
▶ No.59163
>>59153
Dutch angel dragons, protagen primagens etc? They are shit designed in general and just pawbait.
▶ No.59187>>59215
>>59153
What created species are for sale, besides Dutch Angel Dragons? The only other user-created species I usually remember are Eugene Arenhaus' Focco (no idea, don't know if he's still posting), Mick's Sergals (no idea how he feels about fan creations), and Ollie Canal's various ones, Lutrai, Hoomiku, Skole etc. (he's A-OK with fans making their own of these-- and that's straight from him at FC one year.)
▶ No.59215>>59313
>>59187
There's dozens of them all over the place. You just don't notice because they don't become as popular.
▶ No.59313>>59369
>>59215
I suppose so. Are there at least some others who create their own species and let anybody make one? (I would assume they'd request that certain details stay put.)
▶ No.59369
>>59313
I've seen a few that are like "Ask me if you want to make one", which implies some kind of restriction, but it's probably something like just for friends or people they know or whatever. It's doubtful that too many think they can actually make money on that sort of thing. They would instead use it as free advertising, asking that anyone who makes a character of that species put a little note at the bottom "species designed by FurryArtist101" or whatever.
▶ No.59692>>59761
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
DRAGONS WITH PAWS ARE BETTER THAN THOSE WITH CLAWS
▶ No.59701>>59710 >>59747 >>59761
Speaking of dragons, why is there so little smut of them being subby?
▶ No.59707
>>55532
Finally, a snake anatomy expert. Thank the Lord you showed up.
▶ No.59709>>59710
>>55518
The eyes on that creature are so human looking that it ruins the whole design. It looks flatout wrong.
▶ No.59710>>59711 >>59721 >>59747
>>59709
Eh, I don't really see it.
>>59701
Why would a dragon, something pretty much the very top of every odd chain out there, ever end up "subby"?\
Also:
>breed me
>dick
>"bride"
▶ No.59711>>59713
>>59710
Strange how you don't. The thick eyelashes and the general shape are very animu girl looking. An anon in the edit thread might be able fix it.
▶ No.59713
>>59711
Possible, but thenm anime girl eyes aren't very human-looking to begin with.
Given that it lacks clear eyelashes, with just what appears to be makeup, it doesn't bother me much.
If I were to complain about anything it'd probably be the eyebrows, honestly.
▶ No.59719
>>59127
Yeah because spending grand 10 seconds in Google finding reference images of a character/gun/vehicle you're drawing is too much work. If you gonna put 3 hours worth of effort towards drawing all that shit you might as well throw in 10 minutes of studying reference material so the drawing comes out right. Not doing this just makes your drawing look retarded, hence everyone with half a brain pointing it out. It's the same type of fuckup as drawing two left hands or some shit.
▶ No.59721>>59723
>>59710
Because it makes my willy feel nice anon
▶ No.59723>>59725
>>59721
Personally, I'd rather be coddled by the dragon. She'd sit there, refusing to actually consider you a 'lover', but more like a beloved piece of her perfect collection. She'd spend all day trying to make sure you're at peak quality, carefully managing your diet, giving you baths, keeping you safe, "polishing" you.
▶ No.59725>>59726 >>59732 >>59761
>>59723
With her paw pads?
▶ No.59732
>>59725
That bottom character looks added in.
▶ No.59747>>59750 >>59751 >>59792
>>59701
>The first one
Either that dragon is merely the size of a human, or those gold coins are the size of fucking dinner plates.
>>59710
>Why would a dragon ever end up subby
You've been fooled into believing that violence is machismo, and masculinity is never submissive. It's stupid. Why does anyone want to take it up the ass? Because it feels extremely good...? Nah, couldn't possibly be it; they must want to be women or something.
▶ No.59750
>>59747
Well he wants to get fucked by a human so maybe he can change his size with dragon magic
▶ No.59751>>59752 >>59761
>>59747
A Dragon is only good in sub with pawpads. It's cute, lewd and comfy. I don't see how a Dragon could walk without pawpads. They weigh a fair bit too and need pawsies to be comfy while walking.
▶ No.59752>>59755
>>59751
That dragon has a very strange penis slit anon
▶ No.59755>>59758
>>59752
Could be a cuntboy
▶ No.59758
▶ No.59759>>59873
>>59756
Autism is a meme diagnosis at the moment, anon. It's very easy to be misdiagnosed and if the other anon visited a psych, he could be diagnosed effortlessly by acting like big bang BAZINGA for a few weeks. Aspergers is the new ADHD meme diagnosis and the majority of people "diagnosed" in the past few years don't even have it. Just like ADHD it's an excuse for doctors to sell meds. The tumblrinas are fuel added to the fire because they want to be "special". Real spergs are rare.
▶ No.59761>>59764
>>59725
>>59751
>>59701
>>59692
See
>>59726
God damn pawpads chimeric lovers fags
▶ No.59764>>59790
>>59761
I'm going to lick musky dragon pads and there is NOTHING you can do about it
▶ No.59790>>59794
>>59764
Bitch, you can rim you dog anus 24/7 for what i care, but don't you dare posting the picture here or attempting to say that it taste like rainbows because
▶ No.59792>>59795 >>59816 >>59826
>>59747
It's got nothing to do with wanting to be a woman or anything like that.
Especially since a qt dragoness has already got that field covered.
It's more around being an objectively superior being, full of pride no less.
Don't get me wrong, breaking a dragon would be hot as fuck. But, I don't see a dragon willingly being subby.
Unless we're talking full 'dragons are just misunderstood', anyway.
▶ No.59794
>>59790
Dragons really are better with paws. Wyverns would be too, but sadly most are drawn with shitty, fugly anisodactyly.
▶ No.59795>>59796
>>59792
>An ancient creature that is impossibly above you in terms of power and wealth being willingly submissive to you because it lusts after your cock isn't hot
I bet you kiss girls too you fucking homo sapiens
▶ No.59796>>59799
>>59795
Uncontrollable lust kind of fucks over itself when the thing is also massive, powerful, and can basically rape your ass whenever it likes.
▶ No.59799>>59800 >>59816
>>59796
Well in this case it's more of a "rape it's own ass with my dick" situation which I'm okay with.
▶ No.59800>>59876
>>59799
Fair enough. Still, I don't know if I'd really count it as "subby".
▶ No.59816>>59819
>>59799
Sub or dom is mostly a personality trait that can also be a fetish, size or power are irrelevant in this regard
>>59792
Any sapient being can potentially have fetish, which may include being a sub, pride or conceived superiority have little to do with it, unless it's feral and not sapient, then sure pride and instinct have all to do with it
▶ No.59819
>>59816
That's fair enough. Though, I'd argue culture's going to always play a large role in fetishes. Still, I could see a dragoness secretly enjoying a particularly powerful and domineering mate.
▶ No.59826
>>59792
>One can't be "superior" and submissive
>One has to throw away their pride to take it up the ass
You just don't get it.
▶ No.59873>>59888
>>59759
>Just like ADHD it's an excuse for doctors to sell meds
Uh, I don't think there are meds for Asperger specifically. All you can do is treat the ADD or ADHD aspects. Source: friend who has it (diagnosed in 1985, not one of the trendy crowd).
Saying it's THE self-diagnosis trend? That's spot-on, and it has been for about a decade. Poor social skills isn't necessarily a sign that you've got it. Chances are, you just have low social skills and need to get out more.
▶ No.59876>>59893
>>59800
Sanzo's dragons have literal canine paws with pads.
▶ No.59888>>59944
>>59873
>implying that its only self diagnosis
Assburgery is a meme diagnosis for psychs and it has been for the past few years. It is the new ADHD. It, much like ADHD is very easy to misdiagnose and again a deal doctors have with the pharmaceutical companies to prescribe meds to the patient for monetary gain. Regular autism meds are prescribed. As such, the cases of aspergers have skyrocketed in the past few years much like ADHD cases in the 90s. A fair majority of people diagnosed as an assburger don't even have it. Take the term "professional" lightly.
▶ No.59893
>>59876
Not that I've seen. Though, some of them may well have fur, or more often, feathers.
▶ No.59895>>59896 >>60045
>i'll take this mammalian trait and stick it on a reptillian creature, enjoy my hybrid
▶ No.59896>>59897 >>59944
>>59895
>furfags will deny this and tell you that its just a dragon with paws or that all dragons have paws
▶ No.59897
>>59896
I'd rather tell you to put those paws on my face
▶ No.59944>>59991
>>59888
What makes you think psychs are falsely diagnosing it? Do you have proof behind these claims?
>>59896
Nah, just the one nutter on here who rants endlessly about it. Certain stuff in the kobolds thread seems to have set them off.
▶ No.59991>>60043 >>60044
>>59944
I shouldn't have to provide proof as it's so obvious. How do you not see it? It is the new ADHD. Why have the cases shot up 300‰ since the 90s? And what about all the tumblrinas going to these psychs and bribing them for the diagnosis like they do with a tranny diagnosis? What about all the celebs of recent suddenly getting diagnosed with it?
Something is going on. It's either the new meme diagnosis or something else. Spergs often get prescribed standard autism meds and these meds cost a fair bit. South Park did a surprisingly accurate parody of the rising spergery many years ago.
▶ No.60043>>60044
>>59991
Better recognition of symptoms, maybe. Kids in the past may have just been said to have ADHD, or been marked as having some nondescript mental retardation. The thing is, autism is an extremely wide spectrum, ranging from "not quite neurotypical" all the way down to "will perpetually be a mental baby and may bite your face off". This doesn't mean that everyone with a diagnosis requires treatment or drugs. They still haven't found a measurable difference like they have with, say, just being sad and with being chronically depressed. Also, there is no such thing as "autism medication"; they may put someone on any number of uppers or downers, or anti-anxiety drugs, or anti-depression drugs, or anti-psychotics in extreme cases. It's just treatment of symptoms, because there isn't even the smallest idea about what causes autism or if it's even "normal".
The thing is, it's not impossible that being on the autism spectrum might encompass a quarter or more of humanity. Not all these people would necessarily suffer deleterious effects in their lives because of it. It's just a definition, a label if you will. This would only mean that current descriptions of what is and is not normal (especially in the case of developing children), are incorrect. Scientific discoveries can have that effect. A hundred years ago, it was believed that the Universe was made only of what you can see and/or touch; then discoveries were made that showed that the vast majority is actually Dark Matter and Energy. A thousand years ago it was believed that all the species that have ever lived still do; now it is known that over 99% of species that have ever existed are now extinct.
▶ No.60044>>60057
>>59991
>Why have the cases shot up 300‰ since the 90s?
Have they? Got a link to that?
>And what about all the tumblrinas going to these psychs and bribing them for the diagnosis like they do with a tranny diagnosis?
How 'bout evidence that these are happening? A psych can lose their license permanently for that; a bribe (at least, the measly bribe ye random jagoff can afford to pay) isn't worth losing one's career. That goes for both. If you have evidence that psychs are being bribed to give diagnoses of Asperger's or of gender dysphoria, put your money where your mouth is.
>What about all the celebs of recent suddenly getting diagnosed with it?
Such as?
>>60043
>Kids in the past may have just been said to have ADHD, or been marked as having some nondescript mental retardation
Doctors and psychs are starting to get specific, and have really fully realized that each condition requires different treatment.
>they may put someone on any number of uppers or downers, or anti-anxiety drugs, or anti-depression drugs, or anti-psychotics in extreme cases
Exactly. You can treat things like ADD or ADHD which may be had by people who are autistic, but there are no "drugs for autism," really.
▶ No.60045
>>59895
Well, in a self-created fantasy setting, assuming you've decided that species can interbreed (in mine, for example, they can, but doing so requires specific fertility drugs, and it's still likely that the offspring will look almost entirely like one of the parents) hybrids are fine. The problem comes when you begin to insist that these are superior and that all (insert species here) in all settings, official canons and fanons must conform.
▶ No.60057>>60074
>>60044
A human is a human. Psychiatry is flawed and will never be "perfect". Misdiagnosis will still occur. After all, humans make mistakes.
▶ No.60074
>>60057
>A human is a human
This is pointless and completely unscientific. Humanity would still be living in caves if they had started out with "a rock is a rock" and treated them all the same.
▶ No.62147
>>54420
>>54423
And never will. We all know the reason why!
some dumbass murrsuiter probably asked /b/ how to clean a cum stain.
▶ No.62183>>62221
>>58878
>vaginas that have little to no depth and are colored a lot brighter than real vaginas (a bit of brightness is fine though)... like that shit is just fucking horrible
Bugs me to no end in Western fur since Hardiman died and getting worse by the year. At least kemono artists try and capture genital detail and love to draw pussy, the average Western artist is a complete write-off unless you want stereotypical large titty monster garbage, they hide or minimize it as much as possible with shitty poses like doggy style that emphasizes nothing but breasts and hips. I like a nice pair of droopy tits as an accent on my milfurs but god damn the West can't draw tits either, so it's all simplified porn star physique giant tumor tit 1 pixel slit labia shit I don't know how people can stand to jerk off to it anymore.
▶ No.62221>>62222
>>62183
This is a fandom rife with conecocks and nondescript circumcised human dicks, and you're surprised the vaginas are boring and have no detail, too?
▶ No.62222
>>62221
Not him, but to be fair, aside from canines, equines, and I guess humans, most vaginas of creatures aside from the ones I just mentioned are pretty undetailed in real life
▶ No.62326>>62338 >>62403
>sheath
Okay, well, you made an attempt to make it look sensible, rather than just tacking it on, so fair enough even if Pokémon sona is cancer
>lizard
>external penis but no visible balls
>circumcised
Why must the master race always be denegrated by faggots?
▶ No.62330
>>54139
>>54109
>using trump images to post anti anime shill posts
Wow that's a new one
▶ No.62338
>>62326
maybe he's a eunuch owo
▶ No.62403>>62431
>>62326
>I want to make sure everyone can identify this character as a male, but also pay lip service to reptiles having internal testicles
There has GOT to be a better way to do shit than putting a human vagina on a lizard and claiming it's a nondescript genital slit that can be either/or. Yeah, with real reptiles you have to know what you're doing to tell a male from a female, but this isn't reality. Why has nobody invented a way you can tell from the outside what sex the scalie is?? I would, but I can't even draw a straight line.
▶ No.62431>>62476
>>62403
You know what the hell of it is? This character looks fine without the penis. He doesn't really need the indication of his gender. If Rick had just shrugged and said "meh, internal genitals" it would have been fine.
▶ No.62476>>62478
>>62431
Lose the special-snowflake stripes and that retarded rosebush tattoo, and it's a decent character. But the issue is, you'll still get people saying "oh, it's a flatchested girl!" if there isn't a dick literally shoved in their faces.
>That Dreamworks smug-face
Ugh. Burn it.
▶ No.62478>>62616 >>62621
>>62476
not to mention he gets super pissy if you try lewding his character with genitals.
▶ No.62616>>62618
>>62478
Does he? He draws characters with genitals. I mean, I'd suggest it's more about modifying art without permission, not about what the modification adds.
▶ No.62618
>>62616
Well Rick said when he started doing nudes that he wanted to separate the mature content from his other stuff because he wants to keep Housepets and his other comics family friendly. If you go on his website and read his stories he does kind of dip his toe into adult stuff once in a while, so he doesn't seem to have a problem with it as long as stuff like Housepets isn't getting lewded.
▶ No.62621>>62623 >>62648
>>62478
what if you try lewding his character without genitals owo
▶ No.62623>>62639
>>62621
who are you
post more
▶ No.62639
>>62623
What did he mean by this?
▶ No.62648>>62671
>>62621
Is that even possible? At best it can be "suggestive" if he's bending over and showing off his nullo ass. But as Zootopia showed, that's still PG.
▶ No.62671>>62702
>>62648
He could be suckng dick, taking it in the ass, or having his crotch frotted against, to name the most obvious things he could be doing. Then there are strap-ons, vibrators, anal beads...
▶ No.62702>>62721 >>62722
>>62671
Sucking dick or taking dick requires genitals --- someone else's, but still. The rest are basically facsimile genitals, so that's the same thing. Yeah, I can make a patch of bare dirt "lewd" by putting a porno mag and a dildo on it, but that doesn't mean the dirt, ITSELF, is lewd. It's completely different.
▶ No.62718>>62729 >>62799 >>62819
Toe beans are always valid anatomy, especially on females. Digitigrade mammal paws are more feminine than talons or human feet can be. This is fantasy and they're cute and that's the only justification anybody needs.
>>53647
>anorexic
When you say things like this, it reveals medical information about you that should be kept private. Take better care of yourself.
>>54497
A lot of people aren't attracted to animal genitals, because they're animal genitals and this should really be self-explanatory if you're grown out of the middle school HAET TEH HOOMANZ!!1 phase a lot of furs go through. I'd rather everything be human than everything be horse dicks and dog vaginas, or have artists who can't even draw human bits well try(and fail) to figure out what a cloaca looks like.
>>53807
I have an interesting fact to share with you, friend! Did you know that sexually reproducing species tend to prefer partners with similar general anatomical structures over those with vastly different structures? This affects how they create depictions of fantasy characters, such as by adding arms to a bird when they should normally only have wings- because only having wings would render them basically crippled in environments designed for the use of hands and opposable thumbs.
▶ No.62721>>62722 >>62729 >>62771
>>62702
Anal beads and vibrators (bullet vibes that could be taped to his groin, especially)? Hardly. And who said other characters also wouldn't have genitals? Even so, with a partner who's also null he could have his groin rubbed and licked (crotch worship go~), or he could have his tail hole fingered and tongued, or he and his partner could perform a kind of tribadism. He could get sounded in his null urethral opening, or sound a null partner's urethral opening (or they could be sounding each other both at the same time). He could just be getting felt up through his undies, if that counts as lewd, but whether it's lewd or just almost lewd it's pretty unambiguous.
▶ No.62722
>>62702
>>62721
And would you count stuff like sucking someone's fingers, or having his nipples played with?
▶ No.62729>>63186 >>63758
>>62718
>I'd rather everything be human
Then get the fuck out of here, because you clearly do not like anthros at all.
>>62721
Going into where a nullo's urethra is located is a whole 'nother can of worms. Since most of the time they are portrayed as having a perfectly smooth crotch with nothing there, it's a big mystery and usually gleaned over as unimportant. Hell, often they don't even have an anus. Of course, then we're also attempting to define a difference between a featureless crotch and a nullo; usually the latter is portrayed as someone who HAD genitals, but they were removed, while the former is just cartoon anatomy. Again, Zootopia characters don't have an anus, either, despite the fact that they MUST, because they do eat. It's more about the intent of the artist than anything else.
I would agree about crotch-stimulation, but only if the area is still erogenous. That's a nice fetish, but practically non-existent. Still, it's toeing a weird line because technically orgasms are lewd, even if it's caused only by having an ear licked. This means that if the character's crotch isn't sensitive it's not lewd to stimulate it.
Really, my point was more abstract. If an artist creates a character that doesn't have genitals, for the stated purpose that the character is simply not-sexual, it's impossible to make that character sexual without changing it or adding something.
▶ No.62771
▶ No.62799>>62803 >>62811 >>62813
>>62718
Oh, look. Someone who isn't a retard!
Dragons are not reptiles. The modern representation of a dragon is not reptilian in the slightest. They have paws, pawpads and fur. Not even related to birds either. They are "scaly canines" to put it straight. Exact same skeleton structure as a canine, and most people draw them with dog-like paws and pads. Drawing a dragon without paws is very wrong.
▶ No.62803
>>62799
what if im drawing a past version of a dragon, should those have paws?
▶ No.62811>>62819
>>62799
Studying history in-depth suggests that classical dragons shared traits of snakes, birds, and large felines, and that dragons may have originated as a combination of chimpanzees' instinctive desire to escape from those three types of predators. Eastern dragons can be argued to be more faithful to this original representation, what with being decidedly more serpentine, with feline or canine traits and talons (the antlers are a bit of an anomaly but one which can be put to cultural changes over time).
From what I can tell the modern reptilian dragon probably came from Christianity, as the church was very interested in linking pagan and Jewish dragon legends to the serpent which tempted Adam and Eve. This would have been further cemented with the discovery of dinosaur fossils (remember that most of the scientists who made those early discoveries would have been Christians themselves), many of which did indeed represent giant early reptiles.
So yeah, you are right, but it's not like dragons have never been depicted as pure reptiles either.
▶ No.62813>>62819
>>62799
Your pathetic constant attempt to force the whole board to like your paw fetish is failing, take your losses and fuck off where people draw lizard with paws, because everyone else DO NOT
Also, possible seriously consider to hang yourself, because when confronted with this level of obsessions not even the doctor can fix it
▶ No.62815>>62820
I just like paws because they are cute :3c uwu
▶ No.62819>>62823
>>62813
What the fuck? I'm not whoever this "paw fetishist" is or whatever you're talking about. I just explained a fact. Are you seriously triggered over how a dragon is represented in modern times or do you hate paws for some unknown ridiculous reason? Read both posts below. They explain why you should consider paws on a dragon as valid anatomy.
>>62718
>>62811
▶ No.62820>>62841
>>62815
Wanna see something really cute~?
▶ No.62823>>62832 >>62833 >>62852
>>62819
There is literally only one person on this entire board who keeps popping up everywhere screaming about dragon paws. You even have the same arguments every single time. When are you going to get it through your fucking head that we don't want you here? Last time you bragged about ban evading. Just be warned: we doxxed Bui and eliminated him; watch your ass or the same will happen to you.
▶ No.62832>>62840
>>62823
>durr wull doxx you XD
I don't care. I have nothing to hide and I'm not who you think I am.
You are so fucking retarded, close minded and one-sided that it's amazing.
There are multiple people in this thread that agree a dragon is better with paws and is valid anatomy. Get over it and stop sperging.
▶ No.62833
>>62823
>Just be warned: we doxxed Bui and eliminated him
sage, is that you
▶ No.62840>>62849
>>62832
These faggots think anyone who so much as mentions paws is Bui. It's made getting paw-related requests done pretty much impossible.
▶ No.62841
>>62820
is it more paws? /) > ////// < (\
▶ No.62849
>>62840
Maybe if someone would stop attempting to contaminate the whole board with their obsession that wouldn't have been a problem
Beside, dragon with paw is shit taste anyway, or at the very least stop try to make everyone believe that lizards should have mammalian paw by default
▶ No.62852
>>62823
Was bui actually doxed? I never heard about that.
▶ No.62876>>62888 >>62919
>>62854
Yeah well anon guess what *puts handpaws (which may or may not be draconic) up to your face* now I've got your nose right here >:3
▶ No.62919
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>62876
>>62884
People like you are the reason furries are so reviled.
▶ No.62926>>62934
I dunno why this guy is still arguing that there's some imperative that dragons must be drawn a certain way. Most furries think of dragons as lizardy-- there a reason we have the term "scalies." Do whatever the fuck you want, but quit telling people that anything HAS to be done YOUR way. About 90% of the fandom disagrees with you.
This crowd really might dox you. Do you want that?
▶ No.62934>>62950 >>62969 >>62997
>>62926
I agree with your post, but that last part was cringey and not very threatening.
I mean what the fuck are you gonna do in the off chance his shit was leaked?
Kill him?
▶ No.62950>>62954
>>62934
go to his house and tickle him
▶ No.62954
>>62950
Can I join in on that? :3
▶ No.62969>>62973
>>62934
Most people tend to run away scared when they're info is leaked.
But the correct answer is: photoshop his face onto pictures of a guy getting buttfucked by a dog, and send those pictures to his family. See how well he likes goddamned paws after that.
▶ No.62973>>62993 >>62997
>>62956
>>62969
Dragons are nicer with paws. Toebeans are cute~
▶ No.62993
>>62973
Are you ready to get tickled on your cute dragon paws~ :3
▶ No.62997>>63391 >>63758
>>62934
I won't do anything. I think doxxing is shitty. I'm just saying, this crowd may not hesitate to do that, if someone won't stop being stupid. The worst I'd ever do is mail someone glitter, and that requires some personal action. Someone being an asshole at me on the internet, or being overbearing with their opinions, isn't enough to make me do that.
>>62973
"I like furry dragons with padded paws" is quite different than "everyone knows dragons are dogs, nobody thinks they're scaly any more, padded paws are objectively right." The dragon thread disagrees.
▶ No.63048>>63128 >>63155
I don't like nulls but as a scalie who prefers internal genitals I can definitely see the appeal of a featureless_crotch. Who wouldn't want to wrap their arms around a lizard-boi and run their hand over a smooth and gently scaled groin until you encourage him to peek out? Why is that so fucking hard to find!?
▶ No.63128
>>63048
>Who wouldn't want to wrap their arms around a lizard-boi and run their hand over a smooth and gently scaled groin
me on the other end of that tho
▶ No.63155
>>63048
>Who wouldn't want to gently penetrate your lizard boy's slit, and fuck and frot at the same time
>Who wouldn't want to continue this until he becomes fully aroused and pokes out underneath your balls
>Who wouldn't want to lean backwards a little bit and slip his penis into your butthole
>Who wouldn't want to cuddle tightly as you fuck each other at the same time
>Who wouldn't want to feel the base of his penis throb against the tip of your own as he reaches orgasm and fills your insides, bringing you to your own climax inside him
>Who wouldn't want to giggle when he squirms giddily from the feeling of your cum coating his dick
Talking about things that I've never seen drawn before...
▶ No.63186
>>62729
>If an artist creates a character that doesn't have genitals, for the stated purpose that the character is simply not-sexual, it's impossible to make that character sexual without changing it or adding something
change the spirit without changing the flesh owo
▶ No.63391>>63615
>>62997
The dragon thread does not disagree you ignoramus. Go on FA or Tumblr and try to find a dragon that lacks pawpads and a canine four toe arrangement. I dare you. You will find at least 90% are doglike.
▶ No.63615>>63758
>>63391
Out of 170+ dragony drawings in the current scaly thread, I found snake types, lizard types, alligator types, and only five had anything like canine paws. Two of those had pads.
On FA, I searched "dragon." In two pages, 144 images, aside from obvious hybrids, and not including one "Dutch Angel Dragon" (they're basically hybrids, too), I found five images with a non-hybrid dragon having canine paws or looking "doglike." Adding four more pages, a total of 432 images, total (again, excluding a few hybrid species, and there were still just a few of these) came up to twelve. The rest had lanky, lizardy feet, even the bipedal ones, no pads, no nosepads, etc. Saw some sexy scalies, though.
If you're trolling, I think you need some live bait. These plastic minnows ain't cuttin' it.
▶ No.63745
>>53808
Mayhem doesn't have ears.
Mischief wasn't invented by Renard, but by Squeedge
▶ No.63746
>>55580
This entire site is /pol/, my dude.
▶ No.63747
Humanesque shaped feet are the sexiest kind of feet anyway. Just sayin'
▶ No.63758>>63792
>>62729
>human characteristics with human characteristics reeeeee
>>>/trash/
>>63615
>>62997
>The dragon thread
>being this much of aa turbosamefag that you use your own uploaded pics to control the argument.
▶ No.63792
>>63758
>being this much of aa turbosamefag that you use your own uploaded pics to control the argument
...okay, you officially lost me. If you're claiming I somehow uploaded a shit-ton of non-doglike dragons to a thread that's been going since the end of last month, simply to win this argument, your trolling sucks, man.
...if you're claiming I somehow rigged FA to show only non-doglike dragons in six+ pages of search results from countless different artists, you're really falling flat. C'mon, if you're going to keep playing the "what I like is objectively better and everyone agrees" game, you've got to leave the kids' table and join the pro level.