[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / fur / general / hikki / htg / imouto / radcorp / scifi / startrek ][Options][ watchlist ]

/fur/ - Furry

all fur one and one fur all
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

►►► Get Whitelisted | Rules | Catalog | Log ◄◄◄

| Find & Share | Art | Edit | Literature | Porn |

[–]

 No.50979>>50982 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

R.C. Fox charged with criminal possession of child pornography

https://www.flayrah.com/7130/rc-fox-charged-criminal-possession-child-pornography

http://archive.is/5YVzp

>News out of Aliquippa, Pennsylvania from September announced that one Carl R. Rickwood was charged with over 20 counts of child pornography possession. It has recently been revealed that this perpetrator was actually a furry by the fandom name of R.C. Fox. A full breakdown of the documentation can be found on a video by Ragehound.

>R.C has been a prolific member of the fandom, having his own fursuit since 2014, and also attending and volunteering for multiple conventions. They were also slated to run a disc jockey session at the upcoming Furpocalypse until this news was brought to staff's attention and they indicated they would not be in attendance. They were also featured in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette piece 'Meet the Furries'.

>Since the news emerged, R.C.'s social media accounts on Twitter, Fur Affinity, and even YouTube have been removed, renamed, or disabled. As of now no arrest can be confirmed.

What's the final solution to the cub-sexual problem? Will furries learn to admit that people who like cubs are just pedophiles in disguise?

>Officers interviewed Kirkwood outside his Aliquippa home in January 2016, and he admitted there “might be some” child pornography on his computer, police said. According to the report, Kirkwood told police he has “a very small interest in” pornography depicting children and admitted to having about 50 videos containing it on his computer.

Seriously, what is wrong with these people?

 No.50982>>51006

>>50979 (OP)

>Seriously, what is wrong with these people?

Cub porn was the start

This was the end everyone should've seen coming.


 No.50989

>>50988

>possession should not be illegal

Possession can lead to an underground market for it

Parents also have a right to know if someone they live near beats off to children. Imagine asking someone to babysit and finding out later they jerked off to children nightly.


 No.50991>>51010

File (hide): e3202b580cea5fb⋯.jpg (87.27 KB, 600x554, 300:277, brass eye daily mail.jpg) (h) (u)


 No.50992

>>50988

Post cub pictures in the cub thread or not at all.


 No.50994>>51006 >>51011

>>50993

>lol no. by that logic jacking to furshit makes you irresponsible to babysit animals.

furry characters are proportioned like humans, you're really jacking off to a person who is just wearing an elaborate animal suit

With cub porn you're jerking it to a character that's proportioned like a child, it's a child in an elaborate animal suit.


 No.50996

>>50995

>If this is even true why is there only 1 cub-jacker arrest for every fucking 1,000 cub fetishists?

Police need to follow shit like evidence and procedure when dealing with this sort of thing. They generally only prosecute when they have enough evidence that it's pretty much guaranteed that they'll get a conviction. It's why they charged him with 20 counts since if 19 of those get thrown out he's still going to prison. Additionally they'll usually prefer to prosecute based on irl evidence. The article describes that he had video so cub was just the stepping stone to the actual shit that they discovered him with.

Cub is sort of in a legal grey area where because it's technically furry it sort of gets a pass despite being of children with animal features.


 No.51000>>51001 >>51007

>Pro-cub posts deleted

"/fur/ is a place for discussion guys"


 No.51001>>51006

>>51000

What a waste of trips. Sorry you don't get a place to freely talk about your love for little children's butts.


 No.51002

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


 No.51003

>PA

that's where massive "it's muh lifestyle" cub fanatic supersonic250 lives and where those 5 furries were busted for gang molesting that kid.

Chris Hansen needs to set up there.


 No.51006

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>50994

>>50982

>>51001

>There are actually anons here that conflate fictional cub pron with real life cp

STOP PLAYING VIOLENT VIDEOGAYMES ANON. IT WILL MAKE YOU VIOLENT.


 No.51007>>51009

>>51000

>Mods could have spoilered the pictures, but instead just deleted the posts

Censoring is why this board will never be as popular as /furry/ was.


 No.51009

>>51007

Agreed. They could have just deleted or spoiled the images. I made a post making fun of Antifa Furfaggots, and it got censored becuase it was too (((political)))


 No.51010

>>50991

>perv spoof bosses axe wrestling

Parsing this made my head hurt. I swear the people who write tabloid paper headlines seem to be speaking a foreign language sometimes.


 No.51011>>51013 >>51015 >>53026

File (hide): 85319e5aafbd84e⋯.png (581.91 KB, 1024x434, 512:217, 85319e5.png) (h) (u)

>>50994

>furry characters are proportioned like humans

Most furry characters, and fursuits, are actually proportioned more like 12-year-olds than like adults.

Your move.


 No.51013>>51014

>>51011

The feet on your image are clearly a good six inches off. Your proportions are shit and so is your opinion.


 No.51014

>>51013

You're in denial. But that's okay. Most people are. Nothing to be ashamed over.


 No.51015>>51016

File (hide): 1a17c90163693af⋯.jpg (25.99 KB, 529x399, 529:399, 1418202487008.jpg) (h) (u)

>>51011

>using mascot suits as an argument


 No.51016>>51017

>>51015

A fursuit isn't a mascot-suit.

Either way, most furry art conforms to this trend. The ones that are supposed to be "cubs" end up proportioned like infants because it's the only way to tell them apart from the adults who are proportioned like young teens or children. They usually have oversized heads and short stumpy legs. The few that are actually proportioned like real human adults have legs that are so long they look like a ken doll by comparison.


 No.51017>>51018

File (hide): 42866bb856347a4⋯.jpg (269.86 KB, 664x1024, 83:128, 5294817826_c9358b463e_b.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2ef4f40e3638fda⋯.jpg (222.99 KB, 960x1200, 4:5, CmPKxRJXEAIct2W.jpg) (h) (u)

>>51016

>A fursuit isn't a mascot-suit.

There's different kinds of fursuits. The one you linked is a mascot suit

Japanese and skintight ones are objectively better

>most furry art conforms to this trend

That's incorrect. Most furry art has them proportioned like adults and have adult genitalia. The only thing you can maybe claim is Ephebophilia which deals with people aged 15-19.

The thing with Cub is that the context is, what you are seeing is a child. It's not an adult, everyone knows it's a child. With a regular furry character nobody thinks "I'm taking away this little thing's innocence" when they're jerking to it.


 No.51018>>51019

>>51017

>and have adult genitalia

So do the kids, most of the time. They usually even ejaculate.

>With a regular furry character nobody thinks "I'm taking away this little thing's innocence" when they're jerking to it

That's a strawman. Very few people into cub like it because of that reason. Most "cub" characters act like adults, especially with regard to their sexuality.


 No.51019>>51020 >>51024

>>51018

>cub art features children

>Wearing children's clothes and doing childlike things

>Act promiscuous

>Suddenly this makes it different

This is more like a pedo fantasy. Like "the child is coming onto me" so that it doesn't come off as rape.


 No.51020>>51025

>>51019

>They're obviously kids because they act like kids!

>B-but if they act like adults it's j-just a pedo fantasy...!

I've never, in my entire life, seen someone backpedal this hard.


 No.51021>>51023

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>51012

What do you define as "kid"? Obviously teenagers shouldn't have any problems with this. Even then, I've known plenty of kids growing up in elementary school that played Halo rated M game Anon and didn't go bat-shit crazy.

Violent video games are not the problem. I've always viewed multiplayer FPS games as something like paintball. You know it's not real, and it's just a video game on the TV , no matter "revolutionary" the graphics are. I was just playing some CoD and Halo with my younger cousin-in-law, and he's doing just fine.

To make my case more clear, violence has actually gone down for the past decade, and yet one of the most popular games young kids play these days is CoD.

Things like bad parenting, and poor mental health contribute to actual shootings. Parents can't just let the TV parent the kids.

In the video, Clinton also mentioned (((cannibalism))). Since when has a vidyagame made someone a cannibal?

Take a look on Healthcare Triage's vid on violent video games. The link between aggressive behavior and violent video games is non-existent. The link between short term aggressive thoughts is more arguable, but that isn't the same thing. Even then, violent novels and books would induce the same effect, yet the Bible has existed for years.


 No.51023

>>51021

meant to reply for

>>51012


 No.51024>>51025

>>51019

>Wearing children's clothes and doing childlike things

What does this even mean? What clothes are children dressed in that adults never wear?? What are the things that children do that adults never do? Are you in those delicate teenage years when you think watching Disney movies is something only children do?


 No.51025>>51027

>>51020

A child can't consent therefore it can't act like an adult in a sexual situation.

>>51024

>What does this even mean? What clothes are children dressed in that adults never wear?

This used to be clearer prior to Millennials since it used to be that adults didn't do children's things but it's besides the point. The people jerking to it are fully aware that the subject is a child, and that is why they are interested in it in the first place. The context is different than any other form of pornography.


 No.51027>>51029

File (hide): de883832cbc024a⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.06 MB, 1280x1094, 640:547, 336520_EmptySet.png) (h) (u)

>>51025

Cubs aren't children, and consent is irrelevant because it's fictional.

>The people jerking to it are fully aware that the subject is a child

So are you fully aware that pic related is a dog? You never see people complaining that those into ferals are obviously into bestiality.


 No.51029>>51031 >>51067

>>51027

>Cubs aren't children, and consent is irrelevant because it's fictional.

Cubs are children. That's the entire reason why a person is jerking off to it. It's in the name. Are you going to claim the subjects in Cub porn are all 18+ in age and going to college?

>You never see people complaining that those into ferals are obviously into bestiality.

Most people who are into ferals don't have a victim complex about how their pornography is grotesque. It's also not illegal depending on where you live. (there are even some countries where it's straight up legal). There are a lot of people into ferals who will admit to also being into bestiality and will own up to it.

Additionally psychologists have studied bestiality and have shown that the fetish is directly based around viewing the animal like it's a sexual fleshlight more than it is being physically aroused at an animal. It's a very different context.


 No.51031

>>51029

You're being intellectually dishonest. Cubs are not real, human children.


 No.51058

>anchored thread

Why not just delete it so you can fully whitewash the fandom's image and pretend the bad things aren't real?


 No.51062

Go to church you animal rapists. Y'all need Jesus.


 No.51067

>>51029

>Most people who are into ferals don't have a victim complex

That might be because they don't have millions of people telling them they're goddamn pedophiles.

Also:

>Furries are animals. That's the entire reason why a person is jerking off to it. Are you going to claim the subjects in Furry porn are actually just well-disguised human beings?


 No.51091

Did this RC Fox post any cub porn? Many of the furries arrested for CP possession didn't draw or post cub stuff.


 No.51141

PA resident here. Can confirm I'm not a pedo.

Alot of weirdos here (Central PA). I mean the local college (PSU) had a pedo up high in it for decades and they all looked the other way as he raped a bunch of kids. PA is full of pedos.


 No.52078

>Cub porn is CP and pedophilia.

I guess in that sense ferals are considered zoophilia, and playing GTA causes you to shoot up your school/work. Gore and snuff art are drawn by psychopathic serial killers.


 No.53026

File (hide): 166f297bc53d5d3⋯.jpg (449.79 KB, 1227x553, 1227:553, autistic shit.jpg) (h) (u)

>>51011

the suit doesn't have good proportions, but yours are also bad.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
37 replies | 6 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / fur / general / hikki / htg / imouto / radcorp / scifi / startrek ][ watchlist ]