[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cute / htg / occult / radcorp / ss / strek / tijuana / traffick ][Options][ watchlist ]

/fur/ - Furry

all fur one and one fur all
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

►►► Get Whitelisted | Rules | Catalog | Log ◄◄◄

| Find & Share | Art | Edit | Literature | Porn |

File (hide): b539b5d30f00722⋯.jpg (17.32 KB, 891x562, 891:562, delphox.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.45556>>45566 >>45575 >>45584 >>45725 >>46594 >>46598 >>46646 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

I know at least some of you fuckers are religious. I would like to hear from you furfags about how your religion makes you feel about sexual feelings toward furry characters, especially if you also happen to be gay. I would rather this not become a fedora measuring contest if possible, so don't try to start any arguments please.

 No.45557>>45558 >>45575

File (hide): 05db991bb0ac034⋯.jpg (28.23 KB, 480x285, 32:19, welcome to the nhk.jpg) (h) (u)

My online friend for years is super gay but he's a catholic so he feels like he has to repress it. It's sad. He likes RPing with me as an Umbreon and me as master and we cuddle and kiss and shit but he doesn't wanna do sex stuff in case it offends god or whatever. I just feel kinda sad about it. Like he clearly wants to let his furry flag fly but he can't. Alas.


 No.45558

>>45557

Whew, for a second there I thought that you were talking about me.


 No.45560

Inb4 the "this is data mining" grammar nazi retard.


 No.45566>>45683

>>45556 (OP)

Why aren't you asking this question in the conversation thread? How many threads do we seriously need asking questions about meta shit about furries instead of furry content itself?

Your sexuality and religion is irrelevant.


 No.45567>>45582

>furry content itself

Example?


 No.45568>>45661

>Religion

Oh boy, this is going to devolve into shitflinging about Christians, Jews, and Muslims, isn't it? Another /pol/ thread in disguise.


 No.45574>>45661

File (hide): 7822200ae70c091⋯.png (1.67 MB, 1750x1100, 35:22, yes.png) (h) (u)


 No.45575>>45587

>>45556 (OP)

For what purpose? Most religions don't say anything about wanting to fuck fictional characters. If you go 3D bestilaity then there might be some problems.

>>45557

Nowehere does Catholicism say you can't typefuck.


 No.45582>>45593

File (hide): 825f9fde7d8beff⋯.png (107.48 KB, 625x468, 625:468, 825f9fde7d8beff2eb71d5250d….png) (h) (u)

>>45567

A game, a comic or a story about anthro characters. Discussing various themes and ideas for the concept.

This should be obvious.


 No.45584

File (hide): 4838ae62738e76f⋯.jpg (57.62 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 1478574029918.jpg) (h) (u)

>>45556 (OP)

>being religious

let's see how many cucks /fur/ has


 No.45587>>45589 >>47946

File (hide): d9903da21f94d02⋯.jpg (57.68 KB, 614x1024, 307:512, 59403389_p0.jpg) (h) (u)

I'm spiritual, does that particularly count?

>>45575

Most religions are pretty explicit about not engaging in sexual immoral activities at all, generally by insinuating that impure thoughts are the devil's work. This would include typefucking, but also general sexual fantasizing.

The obvious work around to this, then, is to typemarry the person you want to typefuck, so it will be a union under God. I wonder if you could make a profession out of typemarrying people so they can typefuck without being judged by God for sinning.


 No.45589>>45594

>>45587

>insinuating that impure thoughts are the devil's work

That's only mentioned briefly in the bible, and even then it only extends to human men "lusting after" human women.


 No.45591

When you mean "religious", I'm assuming Abrahamic religions (Christian, Jewish, Muslim).

I've had some interest in Discordianism, Satanism, and Church of Subgenius.


 No.45592>>45594

When you mean "religious", I'm assuming Abrahamic religions (Christian, Jewish, Muslim).

I've had some interest in Discordianism, Satanism, and Church of Subgenius.


 No.45593>>45661

File (hide): bf0278528bd8174⋯.gif (470.95 KB, 474x379, 474:379, giphy[1].gif) (h) (u)

>>45582

>Furry content means only stories about talking animals and discussing those stories.

4cuck /co/fag detected


 No.45594>>45646

File (hide): 75e36a79e8a53fe⋯.jpg (838.41 KB, 1480x2026, 740:1013, 55157528_p0.jpg) (h) (u)

>>45589

Well, setting aside the fact that the Bible is contradictory and has been muddled heavily by translations, there are a couple of verses that at least insinuate sexual immorality extends to all-encompassing lustness sprinkled throughout:

Mark 7:20-23

He went on: “What comes out of a person is what defiles them. For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come---sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and defile a person.”

In general, the theme of sexual morality throughout the Bible is that of a married couple (frequently referred to as involving specifically a male and female). Adultery is explicitly and frequently defined, but notice in the above verse 'lewdness' is also defined. Various other forms of lusts are mentioned aside from adultery, and we can at the very least make the connection that masturbation itself is considered a sin even if we ignored the Corinthians verses about how a man spilling semen anywhere but inside a woman is hence "unclean." Historically, the entirety of Corinthians is probably just a health thing due to the relative lack of cleanliness of the era, and sex out of wedlock is condemned probably just because having children outside of wedlock is, even in our current society, typically a pretty bad thing for the child. Functionally I agree, though we have decent birth control options now (which is rendered slightly moot whenever one party is deceitful about whether they are properly using birth control because they actually want a child - this could be seen as a thing warned against).

Aside from that, it's not just a Christianity thing. Every Abrahamic religion is pretty strict about this sort of thing.

I guess the Bible isn't explicitly clear about whether or not there exists thoughtcrime, but for anyone particularly caring about God, typefucking outside of typemarriage would be too close to disobeying and succumbing to lusts.

>>45592

Two of those sound like a fictional MLP religion of some sort.


 No.45646>>45700

>>45594

>but for anyone particularly caring about God

For anyone who would bother to think logically about what an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent being who created the entire Universe would actually be like, you could only conclude He wouldn't give the tiniest flying fuck about the nitpicking bullshit in various Scripture.

Maybe He wouldn't want people killing each other. That makes sense. Anything else? Like being gay or eating shellfish or typefucking. Come on. You'd have to be dumb as rocks to not see the human element of attempting to control the masses. Has nothing to do with God and never has.


 No.45650>>45651 >>45700

Wow, this thread is really fucking boring.

What a surprise.


 No.45651

>>45650

Thats because we're not allowed to "derail" it with politics, even though it and religion are basically married concepts


 No.45661>>45702

>>45568

Only if you turn it into one.

>>45574

>Good Yiff

I want to know what that is.

>>45593

Not even /co/mrades are that delusional (unless something changed in the past few years)


 No.45683

File (hide): b674c12f1bf4c46⋯.jpg (24.9 KB, 600x600, 1:1, bobby-hill-omg[1].jpg) (h) (u)

>>45566

>How many threads do we seriously need asking questions about meta shit about furries instead of furry content itself?

This IS furry content you epic retard.


 No.45700>>45750

>>45646

The shellfish law applied to the Israelite tribe, hence the "speak to the congregation of Israel and say to them line" at the start of the chapter. It's not meant to arbitrarily control the masses, but restrain the behavior that would reduce their numbers. Given the setting that they were refugees in the desert and had no tools, you can conclude that it was an act of survival.

The best way to understand why those laws were put in place is to understand the setting. There was no running water or cure for stds in that time period and location, which was why there was a harsh stance against homosexuality. Syphilis was the equivalent of obtaining AIDS in that time period, only a cure was discovered around the 19th century.

>>45650

I'm not in the mood for fighting anyone.


 No.45702


 No.45725>>45726 >>45810 >>45822 >>46161

>>45556 (OP)

A lot of these abrahamic religions teach abstinence from sexual acts because such acts could cause one to lose semen, which is the source of magical power. Unhindered semen spilling can cause a man to become a dumb, angry, beast of burden and unhindered copulation leads to large populations of roving armies burning down village after village in their animalistic search for more food and sex.

It is my personal belief that simply edging without cumming is fine, even so far as taking other people's semen to fuel my magical power. It's amazing how eager men in this fandom are willing to give up their magical energy into some innocent looking bitchboi who just so happened to swish his tail in their general direction.


 No.45726>>45729

>>45725

Dharma is bullshit and you are a double autist.


 No.45729>>45731 >>45736 >>45811

File (hide): 75c3da6d5f6e80c⋯.jpg (237.84 KB, 1280x800, 8:5, 1503695554635.jpg) (h) (u)

>>45726

Shh calm your virgin wizard wiles and let me introduce you to what true bliss feels like.


 No.45731

File (hide): a70ace1a3ea7f62⋯.jpg (26.3 KB, 480x360, 4:3, hqdefault[1].jpg) (h) (u)

>>45729

>Call someone a virgin

>post pokemon


 No.45736>>45739

>>45729

>You will never be a magical recepticle for Sylveon's semen, thus having more potent magickal energies

Feels real bad


 No.45739


 No.45750>>45836 >>46160

>>45700

sounds like arbitrary nonsense; how would restricting eating shellfish improve survivability? you're limiting the food they can eat. Not to mention the mixed-fibers makes no sense, and not planting more than 1 type of crop in the same field? Hasn't god ever heard of the benefits of crop rotation?


 No.45810

>>45725

No, see, you only lose the magical energy if there's a female around to absorb it. Women are the parasites.


 No.45811

>>45729

cute pokes tho


 No.45822>>45836

File (hide): 0686a6a2106fd9f⋯.png (99.79 KB, 586x492, 293:246, Odin the homo.png) (h) (u)

>>45725

>A lot of these abrahamic religions teach abstinence from sexual acts because such acts could cause one to lose semen, which is the source of magical power.

It's not just abrahamic religions, but nordic ones too.


 No.45836>>45839

>>45750

That's the problem with scripture. Because it was written by human beings, it's often full of fucked science and logical fallacies that an all-powerful God obviously wouldn't make.

>>45822

>changing sex into a female

Then it's no longer homosexual, Odin you dumb fucking nigger!


 No.45839>>46167

>>45836

Odin knew that traps are gay.


 No.46160>>46381

>>45750

The issue is that you're dismissing the setting and whom the advice that it was directed at, The advice was directed at refugees with limited resources and primitive tools in the desert, not 21st Metropolitan citizens in Seattle who can buy anything with a credit card.

Being organized, taking precautions, and conserving their resources was their priority. Food is cooked differently and can cause different effects within people. You also took the crop verse out of context as it only specified "two kinds", not "more than one" according to Leviticus 19:19.


 No.46161

File (hide): 97cc2902e62ad4f⋯.jpg (57.57 KB, 749x450, 749:450, precious bodily fluids.jpg) (h) (u)

>>45725

>triggered


 No.46167

>>45839

Eternal Truth


 No.46381>>46416

>>46160

>Food is cooked differently and can cause different effects within people

Yknow some people having an allergy to shellfish isnt justified in denying it to those who can stomach it.

>You also took the crop verse out of context as it only specified "two kinds", not "more than one" according to Leviticus 19:19.

Regardless, it's inefficient.


 No.46416

>>46381

It's tough to see the necessity of those rules from our perspective. Like syphilis and the flu, an allergy seems small time to us because of our advanced healthcare, but desert dwelling refugees in that time period wouldn't bode well with it. You're probably right about two crops being inefficient, which is why they probably prohibited only two instead of more than one.

This discussion is pretty interesting for world building stuff now that I think about it.


 No.46594

File (hide): c7ff7a1ec2a46ff⋯.jpg (33.19 KB, 600x518, 300:259, 7e6.jpg) (h) (u)

>>45556 (OP)

Feelings? Besides the immense shame and disgust for replacing sexually intimacy for cartoons in our fucked up dating culture? At least I'm not some faggot cubfucker, I'm just your average degenerate. >pic related


 No.46598>>46696

File (hide): 2ec06972d78938e⋯.jpg (140.14 KB, 1206x806, 603:403, 1458956135.gldnclaw_preach….jpg) (h) (u)

>>45556 (OP)

Not gay, but am Mormon. Since the idea of becoming as God is our goal. The idea of being something else is fun, but never a real ambition to have. Why would we want to be something that is lesser than that?


 No.46646

>>45556 (OP)

I'm technically a Christian, but I'm about as unreligious as one can get. I'm basically an agnostic, only really Christian ultimately because of how I was raised.

My problem is I don't know who god is, ultimately. What his values, his ideals, his standards of morality are.

Ultimately I believe he exists, but because I don't really know anything of his intentions or impact, and can't seem to know, I've taken the stance that it is irrelevant.

Though, as a result of this jazz, it's heaven what terrifies me the most. I'm worried it's going to have no freedom, no real movement, and is merely going to be a place where you simply feel happy with no real reason.

Hell, at least is understandable that way. But my most cherished value is free will, as it is, and the idea of that being taken away, well, I'd honestly rather face a void of nothingness.

As far as fur shit goes, I have my own values and morality that I try to stick by, and furshit doesn't conflict with it.

Actually, the xenophilia aspect plays right in to it, as it happens.

I'm going to keep doing what I believe is right, and avoid what I think is wrong, because ultimately, God or otherwise, my soul is my own. My values are my own.


 No.46696>>46708

>>46598

Isn't Mormon heaven already full lol? Or is that JW?


 No.46708>>46836

>>46696

You're thinking JW


 No.46836>>46840

>>46708

Same thing, white nerds that knock my house door every month to tell me how my version of Jesus is bullshit


 No.46840>>46851

File (hide): 5f3bbd0726f6db9⋯.jpg (64.54 KB, 960x615, 64:41, Skeptical Stoat.jpg) (h) (u)

>>46836

You asked in the context of Heaven being full. That's not the case. Why would you version of Jesus be bullshit?


 No.46851

>>46840

I'm not that nigger.


 No.46954

I'm Catholic and a furry. Since I'm asexual I don't have to deal with the sexual aspect of the fandom (though I find being cuddled by a large tiger man cute). There's nothing in the bible that says the interest of anthropomorphic animals is sinful. It's just a nice fantasy but that's all it should be. As long as you don't put your will above God, I don't see the problem with Christian furries.


 No.47660>>47661

When I started in the fandom, I thought more furs would be interested in nature-oriented religions, such as Wicca or Shamanism.


 No.47661

>>47660

That's more an otherkin thing. Most furries, like any subculture or really hobby in general, are atheist. When you're religious, it just doesn't leave much time in your life for anything else, when you factor in your job and family.


 No.47691>>47693

I feel like I don't see as many hard atheists, but I do see a lot of "spiritual" types. It usually means that they don't actually want a moral code telling them what to do but at the same time they're scared of there not being any afterlife.


 No.47693>>47705

>>47691

>I feel like I don't see as many hard atheists

We just decided there was no point talking about it anymore after the huge backlash a few years ago


 No.47705

>>47693

>getting mad enough over a strawman that you make another strawman out of the strawman


 No.47946

>>45587

I'm a libra if it matters




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
55 replies | 17 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / cute / htg / occult / radcorp / ss / strek / tijuana / traffick ][ watchlist ]