[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / cats / fur / hentai / htg / late / nofap / sonyeon ][Options][ watchlist ]

/fur/ - Furry

all fur one and one fur all
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

►►► Get Whitelisted | Rules | Catalog | Log ◄◄◄

| Find & Share | Art | Edit | Literature | Porn |

File (hide): 4ebc761b6cd17e6⋯.png (187.45 KB, 741x656, 741:656, sergal armor.png) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.16633>>16648 >>48059 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

ITT: We post, chat, and design fictional races. Not limited to those in the fandom.

Are there any races made in furry communities that have managed to have both decent lore and a good design?

Can we do better?

 No.16648>>16659 >>16667

File (hide): 95c9d5fed7e89b8⋯.jpg (158.05 KB, 450x450, 1:1, 56406097_p0_master1200.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 8af46decb139844⋯.jpg (194.98 KB, 450x450, 1:1, 56406097_p1_master1200.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 2c52c94a70f7f21⋯.jpg (192.19 KB, 450x450, 1:1, 56406097_p2_master1200.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 6dc4a3f6ac19812⋯.jpg (224.43 KB, 450x450, 1:1, 56406097_p3_master1200.jpg) (h) (u)

>>16633 (OP)

>We post, chat, and design fictional races

http://lintw.net/top.en.html

http://lintw.php.xdomain.jp/index.php

>Lintw is a world of the Logical Märchen which is my theme since 2009.

This is pretty autistic.


 No.16659>>16660

>>16648

just looks like generic kemono furry stuff, what makes this a "fictional furry race" that's got lore?


 No.16660>>16665 >>16857

>>16659

The extent of it seems to be their star system and language


 No.16665

File (hide): 826203cd2882e2d⋯.jpg (2.13 KB, 80x89, 80:89, 6dc.jpg) (h) (u)

>>16660

>throw away kemonos in space, with the same culture as earth.


 No.16667>>16671

File (hide): 3b9ed63f9f57abb⋯.png (76.54 KB, 736x655, 736:655, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 4c641436b11c492⋯.png (87.97 KB, 954x894, 159:149, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)

>>16648

>Now you too can make a sin against design

>All these autistic choices

>No hair color choice

Behold the autism revealed.


 No.16671>>16676

>>16667

>sparkledog colors

>hybrid with dragon

>have a "tag"(?) that changes color with mood

>are literally autistic creatures that can't communicate without them

>reproduce solely via SCIENCE!

>they have robot servants

>they live in a liberal utopia

>that's just like isolationist Japan in the 1800's

It's like some Japanese guy came into /furry/ in one of those threads were we discussed all the worst traits of fursonas and worldbuilding, and thought we were talking about things we liked.


 No.16676>>16680 >>16684

>>16671

being a hybrid with a dragon isnt always bad


 No.16680>>16700 >>16714

>>16676

It's a cop-out because a dragon isn't a defined thing. It's like calling your species "an alien"; you can just make it do fuck-whatever and it doesn't violate any continuity. It's lazy and an excuse to make the characters total Mary-Sues.


 No.16684>>16700

File (hide): e53e1cc28602b0e⋯.png (641.73 KB, 753x1039, 753:1039, hybrids gone wrong.png) (h) (u)

>>16676

>being a hybrid with a dragon isnt always bad


 No.16700>>16707 >>16715

>>16680

But what about when it uses consistent and reasonable draconic design principles and wasnt used to make the character a mary-sue?

>>16684

im not necessarily defending whatever these things are, or all X-dragon hybrids since most are indeed lazy and/or shit, but there can be gems in a mountain of dirt


 No.16707

>>16700

Then they can make the character JUST a dragon, instead of shoving some more traits into it.


 No.16713

File (hide): d86a83dd68e7ebd⋯.png (167.63 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, QOo3W.png) (h) (u)

Might not be exactly what you're aiming for, OP, but I always quite liked the Avians in Starbound.

Playing one of them and examining their shit, you get a lot of rather interesting backstory on their culture as a whole. It was nice.


 No.16714>>16716

File (hide): f3caab83044eb9f⋯.gif (29.02 KB, 619x517, 619:517, death incarnate.gif) (h) (u)

>>16680

Eh, to be fair, there's lots of things what properly define a dragon. If you are a gook, by all means, it doesn't mean shit since they're perfectly content to steal western versions right along side Chinese versions, and just label things what got nothing to do with dragons as 'dragons.

But, for us westerners, dragons are fairly well defined. They do have a sort of scope about them we can point to. Reptilian, four legs and a pair of wings, has a breath weapon typically, very large, and so on.


 No.16715

>>16700

>X-dragon hybrids since most are indeed lazy and/or shit, but there can be gems in a mountain of dirt

>gems in a mountain of dirt

Well are you going to just blue ball us or are you going to deliver on these said gems?


 No.16716>>16851

File (hide): dbbb516c9cd185c⋯.png (339.3 KB, 800x1131, 800:1131, 1445549717963-2.png) (h) (u)

>>16714

Incidentally, this is not a dragon. This is a wyvern, or some other dragonoid type what lacks the necessary limbcount.

Likewise, if it doesn't have wings, it isn't a dragon.


 No.16851>>16856

>>16716

Source on this pic?


 No.16856>>16864

>>16851

Sanzo


 No.16857>>16866 >>16886

>>16660

>star system

>autistic interest piqued

>orbital periods ranging from 5 to 57 days

>most distant planet at .19 AU

>planet/star masses are on realistic scale

I'm not an astronomer but I'm not sure this is entirely reasonable.


 No.16864>>16866

>>16856

What's the name of the comic?


 No.16866>>16895

>>16857

Seems like it's actually on point for a Red Dwarf system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitability_of_red_dwarf_systems

>>16864

I don't think there's a continuation beyond that page. He does a lot of one off stuff.


 No.16886>>16895

>>16857

>orbital periods ranging from 5 to 57 days

Yikes. I bet their calendar system is a total goddamn clusterfuck, especially if the planets are tidally locked to the star as would be probable. Years are 5-57 days long... and days don't exist.

Oh, and such places are fine for colonization by spacefaring races, but advanced life could not evolve there. You wouldn't have anything resembling a native growing season (or any seasons, for that matter) and no days means there couldn't be any sort of circadian rhythms in animals, either.


 No.16895>>16899

>>16866

>seems like it's actually on point for a red dwarf system

Huh, so it is. Not sure if the jap chap did his research or just got lucky, but that's interesting to know.

>>16886

Even without tidal locking a planet's climate would be fucked with a year that short.

The habitable planet of the system has a year of 14.7 days, so seasons would be only a few days each. There would be no growing season for deciduous plants at temperate latitudes, so they would need to have tundra-like climates and ecosystems, except that they would also be blazing hot for a few days every year, and these factors would combine to make them essentially uninhabitable.


 No.16899

>>16895

You might be able to get away with it if you pretend that the star has some kind of cyclical variability: periods of increased starspots and periods of increased flares that oscillate on an ~six- Earth-month cycle.

The real issue is that the conditions that enable a planet to harbor intelligent life is a FUCKLOAD more complex than just "has an atmosphere" and "is the right temperature for liquid water".

You have to consider really subtle factors like the Earth's large moon; its formation via giant impact gave a tilt to the Earth creating the seasons, and slowed the rotation giving a reasonable day length, and its presence provides for tidal motion and nocturnal lighting as well as a lunar cycle. A planet this size with a moon that size is not very common: most rocky planets will have no moons or teeny ones like Mars.

There's also the influence of Jupiter, which keeps giant asteroids and comets from hitting Earth and causing mass-extinctions all the time. A little smaller and it doesn't do a good job; a little bigger and it becomes a second star and everything in the system is toasted. But a planet that gets a mass-extinction impact every few million years isn't going to evolve shit.

There's also the presence of certain elements and compounds. How fucked would technology have been if there wasn't a lot of silicon in the crust to make circuits with? Would humanity even have left the Stone Age if there wasn't iron lying around everywhere? What about the huge reserves of coal and oil that powered the industrial revolution? What about radioactive elements, the presence in the core of Earth which helps create the magnetic field that keeps the atmosphere from being blown away and creates tectonic activity? Can heavy elements like that even be attracted by a star as small as a red dwarf and thus end up in the planets that form around it? I kinda doubt it. Without the magnetic field, Earth would be exactly like Mars: geologically dead and mostly airless.

It's my educated opinion that life probably exists all over the galaxy, possibly in every single solar system --- but only on the level of bacteria and perhaps some protists. But intelligent life, like humans? Probably only a few in the whole galaxy, if that. The number of factors to take into account would turn the Drake Equation into something that would fill a blackboard, and return a result that looks like one in a googol.


 No.32461>>32465

Anything more to be said here? It's pretty interesting.


 No.32465>>32470

>>32461

Well I think (insert fictional race) is cool but I'm gonna go on an unnecessarily complex and autistic explanation on why a thing that is not real cannot be real.

Thera ya go. 80% of this thread's content.


 No.32470>>32472

>>32465

Nah, if anything more time was spent learning that something that seemed crazy was possible and opened the door to researching dwarf star systems.

I'm interested in how seasons would actually work on one and if they're more suited to colonization with some effort rather than spawning native lifeforms. And of course what kind of species would be better suited for it.

Btw, wasn't that recent discovery of a star system with all earth-sized planets and a large habitable zone a dwarf system? That may have spurred some recent insight into it.


 No.32472

>>32470

>Nah

>proceeds to get autistic about a speculative thing nobody could possibly care about

Yeah well enjoy the thread and be careful you don't slip on a fucking banana peel Galileo.


 No.32474

Burmecian


 No.32476>>46779

File (hide): cf145b3df4bec15⋯.jpg (324.8 KB, 2000x2846, 1000:1423, trappist-1e_print_e-1.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): cba32b2dfa0a9cd⋯.jpg (24.87 KB, 1022x300, 511:150, trappist1.jpg) (h) (u)

>ITT: We post, chat, and design fictional races

>design fictional races

On the note of the trappist-1 system let's design one or several Trappissian species that could survive and thrive there. The planets are even so close you can easily imagine "trivial" planetary travel.

fun mode: tackle the general challenges and take creative liberties (this includes interesting ways the alien environment might counteract supposed problems)

>Trappist planets are tidally locked

So one side always faces the sun and the other faces away.

If it's the only factor there may be extremes in temperature, or the difference in pressure would distribute heat at the cost of massive storms.

Seasons as we know them probably can't exist.

Something that immediately strikes me as interesting for life on a Trappist planet is measuring a day not by rotation of the planet, but by rotation of the atmosphere, if that makes any sense.

Also would you make races that have a way to live on either side of the planet? Only at the transition between light and dark? Ones that live underground? Nomads that somehow continuously traverse the entire planet with the churning atmosphere?


 No.46779>>46786

>>32476

This is becoming more of a speculative biology thread than fictional anthros


 No.46786

>>46779

"Is becoming"? Nigga you're necroing a 3 month old thread. It never became anything other than another dead thread that was about to get bumped off the catalog.


 No.48059

File (hide): f79efbc300d111f⋯.jpg (114.43 KB, 900x763, 900:763, sergal_by_pathefox-d37jlk3.jpg) (h) (u)

>>16633 (OP)

Always liked sergals. They may be a little autistic, but the original rendition was pretty interesting at least.

I'm a sucker for actually beast-like beast races, though.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
32 replies | 10 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / cats / fur / hentai / htg / late / nofap / sonyeon ][ watchlist ]