>>132466
What you're describing isn't how society was in the last few centuries before the sexual revolution - it functioned like I said. Marriage was for life and not being a virgin at the ceremony was considered so shameful the bride had to wear black instead of white.
Whores still existed but they were a minority and were openly labeled as whores, there was a difference between them and marriage material women. This was because few men would consider marrying a whore, so women had to adapt or they'd end up unmarried and poor with no family.
Pic very much related.
>>132456
I don't know where you deducted that from. I said if you just look at the situation as hopeless and think it can't be improved, of course it can't be improved. No one else is going to do it for you. This the same reason as any destructive mentality
>if I don't give in and accept things I don't like someone else will anyway
That's just not how you change things. You need to analyze the situation and make plans.
I pointed out how unions did the same thing against employers, by refusing to sell labour unless they give in to certain demands they get things their way. If men want women to submit to certain demands they can apply the same method. If you just say
>but someone else will give it do them
then how did the unions manage this? It's working - if you do it. If you don't, nothing happens.