American academy of pediatrics
a.a.p. American academy of pediatrics medical association, in the text specified "not justified" to cut children and infant circumcision. the DANGER was the fraud in the introduction called abstract that DIFFERED from the actual content in the report. yikes!
those money chasers writing medical FRAUD for a swift surgery for some QUICK bucks. awful. and the cut and loss and alteration WORSE than horrible
why we need to make a fuss
the cruel mock "don't talk about genitals" as if TALK is WORSE than actual CUT! but not a fascination with specific genital, INSTEAD the "commitment to bodily autonomy" self decision and human rights, infant human rights, struggle to protect victims female and male from any medically unnecessary genital cut. to end infant circumcision and punish the one cutting.
American Medical Association n
people need to know that EVEN in u.s. where cultural bias, where the cut is sadly common, that a.m.a. American Medical Association who know health wrote not to cut.
similar to netherland medical association the "benefits are still less than risk" of cutting. therefore not justified. d
the cruel cut
people commonly spread propaganda "healthier to cut" but not about their own body, but as an excuse to cut OTHERS that is awful. well doctors KNOW health and still warned about the ethical problem in a.m.a. not to cut for health reasons due to medical ethics. only cut for medical urgency.
American academy of pediatrics
American academy of pediatrics a.a.p. medical association, in the text specified "not justified" to cut children and infant circumcision. the DANGER was the fraud in the introduction called abstract that DIFFERED from the actual content in the report. yikes! those money chasers writing medical FRAUD for a swift surgery for some QUICK bucks. awful. and the cut and loss and alteration WORSE than horrible