[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / bestemma / doomer / fast / film / shota / vietnam / xivlg ]

/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Where cartoons and comics collide!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: b20b4576d4513df⋯.jpg (99.53 KB, 800x528, 50:33, legomovie2.jpg)

 No.995401

>Official name is The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part

>Directed by Mike Mitchell (Alvin & the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked, Sponge out of Water, Shrek Forever After, Trolls)

>Written by Raphael Bob-Waksberg (BoJack Horseman)

>Release date is Feburary 8, 2019

 No.995402

>It was also announced that Lord and Miller have returned to re-rewrite the script to tackle with gender issues on how a girl plays vs. how a boy plays.


 No.995405

File: 570eae326cb1f83⋯.jpg (27.1 KB, 542x416, 271:208, 73393142.jpg)

>Written by Raphael Bob-Waksberg (BoJack Horseman)

Why?


 No.995413

>>995405

They needed an edgy outsider to counterbalance Mike Mitchell


 No.995418

File: 604acd4460e6135⋯.png (208.59 KB, 361x476, 361:476, 38cd113eed1e1c174b0e8eecf5….png)

>>995402

>>995406

Didn't LEGO come under fire a few years back for releasing different products specifically for girls that were backed up by millions of dollars worth of research and resulted in an unprecedented spike in sales?


 No.995419

>>995402

I hope it's not boys vs. girls the movie. Anything but that.


 No.995421

It will be shit if they kick out the guys who made the first


 No.995425

>>995418

I remember the toy line but not the loltroversy or the cash boom.


 No.995427

File: 2f0f881c5af207c⋯.png (555.08 KB, 612x871, 612:871, dana the cunt.png)

>>995418

Yep, and the usual crowd didn't understand why anyone would want female legos or pink bricks.


 No.995430

NO NO NO NO NO

GOD DAMMIT

The first one was such a endearing and perfect story. It doesn't need a sequel, and there's absolutely nothing you can do with it from here. All you're going to do it completely fuck it up.


 No.995437

>>995401

After the Lego Batman movie blacked half of it's characters and shoved in gay undertones, I don't have any amount of excitement for this. The first movie was perfect. This is just awful.


 No.995440

They already made Lego Batman


 No.995441

>>995402

>how a girl plays

Not with lego, usually.


 No.995443

I was hoping for The Lego Movie 2: The Brickster's Revenge.


 No.995444

>>995418

From people like Anita, yes. So no one who matters.

>what the fuck, why can't girls play with cowboys?

<they're free to buy the sets, but we did the research and most would rather not

>silence


 No.995454

>>995437

>shoved in gay undertones

lol ok


 No.995493

File: 63dc9ad09c35332⋯.jpg (82.16 KB, 780x800, 39:40, 14233005_848824235248979_5….jpg)

>>995444

>>995418

I love how at the same time when a girl does like boy toys or vice versa they claim look this kid is actually the opposite sex mutilate its genitals!

Leftism is self-contradictory and looping on itself.


 No.995497

>>995493

>Rekt

Jesus, what an unnecessarily cringy 4th panel.

It would have worked just fine with 3.


 No.995518

>>995401

So they'll be using a director whose job is to make shitty sequels? Already sounds like a dud.


 No.995521

File: f8d9431041f1892⋯.png (23.05 KB, 278x262, 139:131, the eyes never lie.png)

>>995402

Just when you thought you expectations couldn't get any lower, this sentence was strung together.


 No.995524


 No.995540

>>995402

And Will Ferrell got into a car accident.


 No.995544

>>995402

>>995419

>>995521

I believe it's supposed to reference how boys and girls play with LEGO in their own way, with the younger sister being mentioned at the end of the first movie. I still hope the concept of the "alien invasion musical" concept is still present though.

>>995418

>Didn't LEGO come under fire a few years back for releasing different products specifically for girls that were backed up by millions of dollars worth of research and resulted in an unprecedented spike in sales?

I'm posted about it before here and what you said is all true. They gave girls what (LEGO) they wanted (from fuckloads of research) and they ate it up, and the best of this is the LEGO Friends (and Elves) line isn't supposed to be a girls sectioned theme, it really is there for the purpose of hooking girls on to LEGO so they can eventually move on to regular LEGO sets.

I will say though I still hate the design of the "mini dolls" used in those sets compared to the standard LEGO minifig.

>>995427

It's dumb fucks like this who complain, yet don't even buy the currently available buckets of bricks for any kids they know. Then again a good set of parents would protect their children by keeping them away from women like that.


 No.995567

>>995402

Boys and girls do play differently, though, and they should be encouraged to do it both ways.

Girls follow the instructions and keep it as is with roleplay built around it, like using dolls on the house/car.

Boys build it once, get bored and fuck around with it to make crazy things that have no relation to the original set nor semblance to what they're going for.

The former teaches order and practicality, the latter teaches thought and experimentation.

Everyone needs all of those skills, so both should be encouraged instead of "boys vs girls". If you read one of those """peer-reviewed""" journals on the topics surrounding gender and strip away the usual leftist madness, there are numerous benefits for getting kids to play in the style of the opposite sex or neutral ways. I'm not talking about dressing up as trannies, but stripping it down to basic ideas and incorporating them into what you steer a child towards to balance their learning.

>>995512

>posted 3 hours ago

<posted 3 hours ago

You don't belong here, Redditor.


 No.995629

>>995567

Report and ignore man.


 No.995991

>>995402

>girls play with X toys

>boys play with Y toys

<issue

Just leave the kids alone goddammit.


 No.996111

>>995964

If we're doing this, just a silent look for th last panel is probably best.


 No.996113

>>995991

STOP BEING NORMAL

STOP HAVING FUN


 No.996120

>>995430

BATCUCK


 No.996509

>>995405

>(BoJack Horseman)

>

>Why?

I assume Will "Batman" Arnett had some pull.


 No.996527

>>996368

>>996111

I'd argue that 3 panels would work fine. It'd end on the final retort about dresses, which is the main point of the comic.


 No.996559

File: 3bf299eccd0921c⋯.png (80.01 KB, 1150x416, 575:208, b3e62f94f1b194083e98d3f572….png)

>>995497

Here you go


 No.996577

>>995964

That IS much better, actually. Saved.


 No.996578

>>995402

Or… OR… they could have just added a couple of the fucking Lego Friends and been happy with that.


 No.997895

>>995454

To be fair Joker basically had a crush on Batman in that film.


 No.997975

>>997895

That's pretty gay.


 No.998392

>>996587

>>996559

Nice.


 No.998424

>>995964

Nice Anon.


 No.998691

>>995401

Does it need a sequel?!?


 No.998781

>>998424

>>998392

What was their before?


 No.998812

File: 6815449bf7217b7⋯.gif (876.72 KB, 300x225, 4:3, 4f6a807398a0917d3d5c4ab3e7….gif)

>>995402

>Lord and Miller have returned

Oh thank fuck this might have a chance now

> to re-rewrite the script to tackle with gender issues on how a girl plays vs. how a boy plays.

CHRIST!

Does anybody know about that documentary where a guy believes all the feminist horseshit goes around to do reserach for himself only to find it's all fucking wrong and boys and girls like different shit because no shit. Somebody linked it on this site years and it was brilliant but I've never managed to find it since.


 No.998833

>>998812

The Norwegian one? I think it was ca;;ed Brainwash.


 No.998834

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>998833

I think you're right


 No.999053

>>998834

Hooktube man.


 No.999076

>>998781

It was the same four panel image with the dialogue in the final panel removed. That's all.


 No.999549

File: b89f9163832ebcb⋯.jpeg (430.22 KB, 1382x2048, 691:1024, DexwcsrV4AI2Irk.jpg-large.jpeg)

New trailer tomorrow.


 No.999551

>>999549

It can't be as soulless as Ralph Breaks the Internet.


 No.999564

>>999549

>February '19

When did the trend of announcing movies really far in advance begin? Has it always been this way? For some reason I've always thought this was a relatively recent thing, but maybe I just don't pay attention that often.


 No.999709

File: 5b0d318f214099a⋯.png (278.4 KB, 635x879, 635:879, unikitty.png)

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=n5UB6soBC-Y

Alright /co/ the teaser is up. No way right now will I pay to see this with how they want to take the sequel but I'll pirate it for sure because unikitty is in it and I love her. She's so small and adorable.


 No.999711

>>999709

>edgy mad max world

>"so you fought, and master built, and kicked butt, but the hapless male was the leader"

dropped. these writers probably didnt even watch the first movie.


 No.999719

>>999551

I hate the fact that the title alone is a reference to kim kardashian's ass.

Every media outlet everywhere was quoting "kim kardashian breaks the internet!!" because of her enormous ass photo, and now it will forever be associated with Wreck It Ralph.

>>999711

Also why the fuck does there need to be a sequel in the first place? The first one already broke the 4th wall with how there's just some kid building everything, and the hero saw the real world beyond the veil of his, and how the whole conflict was a kid wanting to have fun with his dad who was too uptight and orderly.

So what, the next conflict is gonna be about the kid's sister wanting to have fun with her big brother but now the big brother doesn't have time to play with legos because he plays sports and has friends now?


 No.999720

File: f6bbc9ea0697e07⋯.webm (11.94 MB, 640x360, 16:9, videoplayback.webm)

>>999551 Here, I shouldn't have fucking said anything. It really is boys vs. girls the movie.


 No.999723

>>999719

>So what, the next conflict is gonna be about the kid's sister wanting to have fun with her big brother but now the big brother doesn't have time to play with legos because he plays sports and has friends now?

I wouldn't be surprised if that was it or that the big brother doesn't want his kid sister playing with him so it becomes gender wars nonsense


 No.999725

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>999711

>>999719

I think its becasue the sequel actually had an ending where Lego Duplo attakced and fucked everything up so now Lego Friends comes in to fuck more shit up.

and then Bionicles come in to save the day


 No.999727

>>999725

Were the piraka the niggers of bionicle?


 No.999728

>>999719

And it should obviously be "Wrecks the Internet". Not a second of thought went into that title.


 No.999730

File: 148e48b8ba66ae6⋯.png (537.36 KB, 768x431, 768:431, ClipboardImage.png)

>>999720

>boys vs girls the movie

didn't look that way to me, though it does look like they managed to take everything fun about the first one and suck it out.

>generic post apocalypse setting

>the characters are all themed after this setting now whereas they used to be diverse and colorful

>plotline looks weak

also, it looks like that crap about what's her face being the main character was smoke and mirrors, all the same it just doesn't look all that good.


 No.999733

File: fafa222eafe398e⋯.jpg (131.08 KB, 1600x681, 1600:681, 85649484454814.jpg)

>>999730

Well actually I thought about a couple things also Will Ferrell is gone for this movie apparently so the father is not here probably

>Taco Tuesday was when Lego duplo attacked and fucked everything up

>Maybe a time skip of sorts with them growing older

>The SIS-STAR system probably heavily features lego friends/elves

>The alien is a Mini-doll from lego friends

>Abducts Lucy and the other minifigs the son liked the most could mean she either takes them out of storage or she actually takes them

>The Apocalypse setting is one of 2 things either the boy is going through and edgy phase OR he just does not play with the legos anymore since they are collecting dust

>The mini-figs are getting abducted since the sister maybe wants to play with them and maybe the son thinks legos are kid shit

I dunno the plot has potential and not just be another girls vs. boys movie


 No.999735

>>999730

>>999733

Hopefully it's just a parody of post-apocalypse movies.


 No.999738

>>999728

Which is funny because in that new trailer, they even mention that Wrecks the Internet would make sense because he's Wreck-it Ralph. They must be following the subvert expectations route of writing.


 No.999761

Wasn't the original plan for the sequel a parody of damsel-in-distress plots (not the suckyass modern fixation on them though) by having Arnett Batman be kidnapped? I mean he does get kidnapped here but the last-minute rewrites are obvious.

At this point I would rather watch that than this.

Also what is with the recent jerking about Fury Road? For something that didn't gross that much at the box office le feministes seem to have claimed it as "their" movie. Not that they would care about the craft of course.


 No.999762

>>999761

I bet most of them didn't even know about Mad Max until Furiosa.


 No.999772

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>995567

I built stuff (spaceships, castles, etc) then kept it the same for God knows how long. I used to get angry when my parents accidentally broke it. Never liked it when it got broken or I couldn't rebuild it exactly the same as I had. I used to play by just moving it around and imagining stuff in my head. Guess I was a bit on the autistic side, tbh.


 No.999773

>>999761

I was popular about three years ago, which means all of the projects that started production at that point are now coming to fruition, I guess.


 No.999794

>>999720

I dunno about this, the last movies have been great but we all know what Hollywood is like nowadays in trying to insert messages into it's movies, so wither it's been affected by that is making me cautious.


 No.1003998

>>999720

Unnecessary sequel is unnecessary


 No.1005897

>>999727

Yeah pretty much.


 No.1006001

>>1003998

Well, it ended with a girl vs boy cliffhanger, so your opinion is stupid.


 No.1015604

>>1006002

Then wait 20 years for reboot


 No.1016048

>>999733

>Thomas the Tank Engine was going to have a cameo in the Lego Movie

Is there a story behind this?


 No.1024962

bump


 No.1024964

>>1024962

For what reason?


 No.1024986

File: 18fb1abe1ffc8d4⋯.jpg (60.1 KB, 598x557, 598:557, 001.jpg)

>>1016048

He was an official Lego product in the past


 No.1025152

>>999762

None of them did.


 No.1025153

>>1006001

Its not really a cliffhanger when its played for laughs.


 No.1025163

I want to like this movie because I really liked LM1. The shit at the end of the first trailer though, "Men, PSHHHHT, amirite?" it's hard to reconcile that obvious pandering crap.


 No.1035617

>almost winter 2018-2019

>still no second trailer


 No.1036852

Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>1035617

trailer came out this week take a look


 No.1036867

>>1036852

>Mad Max meets the shitty half of Darling in the Franxx


 No.1036966

>>999053

You mean Invidious.


 No.1037683

>>1036867

Franxx was always shit.


 No.1037689

File: 842060d58a94d03⋯.png (58.43 KB, 715x703, 715:703, IMG_0336.PNG)

>it's winter 2018

>still no second trailer


 No.1037697

>>1036852

This is a forced way to spell "your wish is my command."

>>1037689


 No.1047121

File: 2e43ad24b8fb50e⋯.jpg (164.31 KB, 2148x1199, 2148:1199, ruth bader ginsburg.jpg)

reminder that this will be a thing


 No.1047128

>>1047121

>background is pink with hearts

>for the woman who believes everything is sexist and racist until proven otherwise


 No.1047263

>>1047121

The left is desperately trying to meme her survival through Trump's presidency.


 No.1047582

>>998812

Fun fact, if you put kids' toys (for boys, for girls, for either) into a chimp enclosure, the chimps will play with the "correct" toys all on their own.


 No.1047584

>>995567

I remember playing with boys and girls when I was a kid, and this is pretty accurate tbh. The main difference I noticed at the time was that boys all understood "yes and" which made things more fun. If I did something that a girl didn't expect she couldn't deal with it and had to "correct" me. Looking at contemporary culture I see boys playing "like girls" a lot (life simulators and such) but not much of the reverse…


 No.1047591




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / bestemma / doomer / fast / film / shota / vietnam / xivlg ]