>>1000780
With this AMOUNT OF GREAT IDEAS and THIS PISS POOR EXECUTION? No. I think Danny Phantom is absolutely the best example of lost potential.
Other cartoons like Juniper Lee, Kim Possible, Jake Long, Tutenstein had a mediocre/decent run to not be called wasted potential. Ben 10, TMNT 2003 were acceptable enough and even called good. Other cartoons ideas were designed to be comedy and mediocre drivel(Dexter's Lab, PPG, 9th Grade Ninja, El Tigre), other cartoon ideas were simply bad to begin with like MLP FIM before they got flanderized even worse.
Other cartoons like Thundercats had 1 good episode before it went to shit. Other cartoons from the 80s had toyetic ideas which had to be severely modified and rebooted to make something good out of them (He-Man 2000s)
Other cartoons got their budget murdered before they got a chance to shine properly (Tron Uprising)
Stuff like Bunnicula doesn't have interesting executions/ideas/villains/story properly designed from the books.
And so on and so forth.
Penn Zero Part Time Hero again feels like it was simply meant to be comedy-driven rather than action and quality-driven.
Randy Cunningham was in a similar situation with Danny Phantom, but absolutely not on the level of DP and not with that retarded FOP comedy. Danny Phantom feels like an attempt at Ben 10/Jake Long in terms of style, but the creator of Fairly Odd Parents is incapable of writing a good action cartoon. It's sad to see these 1 dimensional hacks incapable of emulating more than 1 style still getting popularity.