[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / eris / leftpol / marx / newbrit / s8s / ss / vg ]

/christianity/ - Christian Theology

Free speech discussion
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 0f9eb3003f68dca⋯.jpeg (108.23 KB, 1024x552, 128:69, lev2013.jpeg)

0d4345  No.513

>If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

>Leviticus 20:13

This is clearly a part of the moral law. Paul condemns faggots on multiple occasions (Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). Christians who only want to half ass this law are heretics. "Love the sinner, hate the sin" is faggot propaganda. They don't bake the cake but welcome them in their store. NO! FAGGOTS ARE REPROBATES AND NEED TO FACE THE FULL LAW OF GOD! THEIR BLOOD SHALL BE UPON THEM!

0d4345  No.514

This was a deleted thread on the other board, but I didn't get a good answer

Leviticus was used as a guide for government in the OT, but should we use it today the same way?

The fact that sodomy is an abomination will never change, but what if fags were banished instead of executed. Would that displease God?

What if we executed for a crime that didn't mandate execution in leviticus, like having sex with a woman on her period. Would that displease God?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / eris / leftpol / marx / newbrit / s8s / ss / vg ]