>>755316
>military training and boot camp at a young age
Yes … that's what Pakistan needs more of … military … because, y'know, it's done so well for y'all so far …
>a lot of other muslim countries were pretty modern and decent in the 1960's like afghanistan, syria and etc
Yeeeesssss … now, ask yourself, why IS that?
Since you ask, imho, I cannot see how the current crop of islamic thinking can possibly do anything other than cement more islamic thinking and the (((ptb))). I'm not referring to the (((Rothschilds))) here. The Islamic world has its own. They're the military, in Pakistan the army and ISI, the clerical class, and the wealthy families. Or, as we called them in Europe: the nobility (who were the armies), the ecclesiastes and the royalty. The country was an (British) occupied version of medieval a century ago, got thrust into democracy and progress and was ripe for being subverted by those same (((ptb))) back to being the same old medieval society.
tah-dah!
While India isn't exactly a utopia of milk and honey, at least it embraced something other than the (((ptb))) and is limping into the 21st century with self-inflicted wounds. (Though, right now, the BJP and its radical Hindu allies are fast moving IT into the 17th century, too.) Pakistan refused that, embraced a rhetoric of paranoia about India invading tomorrow, and look at the country now.
I am certainly definite that CHRIST is the solution to all the world's ills – though not necessarily in the way /pol/ thinks I do. If Pakistanis were to embrace Christ tomorrow, the country would transform within generations. But Christianity in and of itself is not the path to societal, scientific, cultural and economic progress – plenty of majority Christian countries are poor as dirt – but Christ does have a substantial impact, when properly embraced, on eradicating the corruption, on taming the rages and lusts, on making a better people. This is not, however, a good reason for embracing a religion: Christ alone is.