>>737270
>The only people with an ok personality are people who look average.
>Good looking people are usually vain and full of themselves.
>Ugly people are insecure and hate themselves and the world. Neither of those are good.
Plenty of average men have great personalities, ugly ones too. You seem to be coping by saying that good looking men are vain and full of themselves. They can be just as shitty in the personality department as ugly ones, or just as good. The point is that personality does not matter as much as you think it does. Your face projects your personality out to people in public. If you look good, you're assumed to be a better person. If an ugly man sends a woman some romantic bs, he's deemed a creep. If an attractive one does the same thing, he'll get cutely rejected at worst and hailed as some Romeo at best. My point is that whenever one is told they have a bad personality, it's usually more to do with their looks than anything. Personality is a meme.
>We all have desires and instincts, but that doesn't mean that giving into them will make us happy.
Of course not, but we're not talking about that. Women have tapped into their innate sexual lust for the top males. If not, we wouldn't be in this situation.
>There are dumb women who keep falling for their own foolishness time and again, but
after some time you just learn how it's not worth it.
So settling down after riding the cock carousel?
>Good looking males have their own issues. They frequently have ginormous egos and they expect to be worshipped.
It's easier to "fix" your personality if you're starting off with a royal flush in your hand. Good looking males can do so much bad shit and still be forgiven. It's because their face projects their "personality" in the public sphere. Bad looking men have been dealt Yugioh cards in a game of Blackjack.
>Yes, anon, if you are good looking AND virtuous, people will like you more. But if you are ugly and virtuous people will like you still.
Apparently it was some epic revelation, since you're still deflecting it. If you're good looking, people will like you, not if you're virtuous. Nobody gives a shit about virtuous behavior today, and I doubt they ever did besides the very minor church faithful throughout history. Virtuous ugly males are pandered to so they keep producing for society, but they will always be second class males fighting for leftover goods.
>Now if you lack virtue and you are also ugly… that just means that you allowed your outside become your inside.
Again, face projects a lot of so called "personality."
>Actually the problem is sexual liberation and "ugly" males who can't get over their libido. If you really are that ugly, just give up and become celibate and practice virtue. You either find satisfaction in God or you will find the confidence to be with a woman. You shouldn't be lusting after women anyway, and if you're ugly that means that they are not throwing themselves at you, making celibacy easier. So accept who you are and run with it, after all, being ugly is not a sin.
So you admit ugly males are doomed, yet you claim confidence to be with a woman will allow them to acquire a wife. Not everyone can become celibate intentionally, it's a calling for very few. But how can they marry when nobody wants to be with them? Nobody is saying being ugly is a sin, but it's a terrible hand to be dealt.
>How is it delusional? You should pursue God and virtue for their own sake anyway. A wife is just a pleasant side-effect.
Because like I said, most men can't be celibate. Barring them from access to women and thus wives is a suicidal route our civilization is taking. Are you a female?