>>729806
Most people here will just attack the incidental Jew stuff and ignore the fact that at its core Dispensationalism is a hermeneutical system (hence the name). I would say this is because the board is overrun with papists and they don't really have a hermeneutic other than "the pope, what he said, thats it". The two biggest problems with dispensational hermeneutics is 1. It is not taught by the bible and 2. It is contradicted by what the bible says. Dispensationalists hold to a series of substantially different divine interactions with man called dispensations. This is the reason why they adore the Jews, because they so sever the old covenant from the new, that all the promises of the old law are made for and only for the Jewish nation. In classical dispensationalism it is taught that under the old law men were saved through their own works of the law, however ince this seriously undermines justification by faith and blatantly contradicts countless statements of Paul, this classical form has fallen out of favor in favor of less consistent systems where each of these different covenants has the same method of salvation.
Obviously, this is not something that is taught or reflected in the bible, but we are told that God made a covenant with Adam predicated on Adam's personal holiness (Gen 2:15-17), that when Adam broke this covenant by sinning all his progeny fell in their covenant head (Gen 3:17-19, Rom 5:12-14), that to rectify the problem of this curse Jesus Christ came and died for our sins, and founded a new and gracious covenant predicated on His righteousness and death (Gal 3:10-18, Rom 4:1-25), which justifies all the members of the covenant (Gal 3:1-9) and that this has been the selfsame covenant of grace from the repentance of Adam down to this very day. Hence, the promises of the old law properly belong to the Church, since they were made to the Church.
>>729851
Last time someone said something like this they self-identified as a classical dispensationalist and stated they were to defend dispensationalism and when I provided a thorough refutation of the doctrine they cowered away and failed to respond.