>>706188
>individual quotes from the Fathers aren't infallible
The tradition, not only several church fathers, but also the liturgy (byzantine, Syriac) and more recent saints are unanimous. But if you ask for an argument, give one yourself in the Tradition.
There were no oeucumenical concil on orthodoxy so I won't find what you ask. But I have declarations of patriarch (unfortunetly I haven't found the english version I could link to you yet)
the magisterium should not speak about everything, but it let breath to the Tradition. And the tradition on judaism is unanimous.
Read also the epistle to romans. Here is an extract 12: 25-32 (NIV) :
>25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: >Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26 and in this way all Israel will be saved. As it is written:
>“The deliverer will come from Zion;
>he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
>27
>And this is my covenant with them when I take away their sins.”
>28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30 Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now[h] receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you. 32 For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
A hardening of heart is what I call a curse. Now, I believe in universal reconciliation, so I interpret the last verse like that. Jews are now our enemies (enemies of Christ), but we will reconcile with all our enemies.