>>698160
>Help me out, what is the biggest contradiction, scientifically
It's not an observable/empirical hypothesis, in fact it is totally impossible to support scientifically, so the scientific objection is that it's groundless, can't be falsified, can't be demonstrated even in principle.
>a demon tells you….
>contradiciton and… philosophically, to the theory of Eternal Reoccurrence?
#1 Don't trust what a demon says.
#2 The worldview it requires is nonsensical, it's just materialism/nihilism on infinite repeat. Who created this predetermined world of infinite return where nothing changes from cycle to cycle? It just appeared by itself and repeats for no rhyme or reason? No reason to believe this.
> I realize the eternal return story is some ubermensch mental test presented by Nietzche,
Even as a mental test its kind of goofy, when taken seriously one realizes that nothing he does is his own will, but instead predetermined by some vague external mediator….bleh