/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

Wat

In the sense that sexuality is sacred and spiritual union, his analogy isn't too off. Sounds a little awkward, but modern societies relationship to sexuality is perverse

>>697844

>Padre: my son, this isn't just wine you're drinking, we have to root this in human sexuality, it has a sexual nature.

>You mean sacred?

>We have to root this to HUMAN SEXUALITY

>What do you mean padre?

>well let me show…you

>….

This is how sexual abuses happen in the Church.

>>697847

That's a stretch

If you stomached your way through the grand jury report, you'd know that some of the pedophile priests made a similar comparison. There's something really dark at the bottom of this. I don't think they thought they were trangressing anything. I think they believed this.

>>697836

>when the papists take the metaphor of christendom being christ's bride too literally

>>697913

>>697912

To be fair the comparison to sex is also a metaphor, I know it's probably triggering to puritans

>>697914

>to be fair

to be fair would be a rope stretched around the neck of every one of these pedophile scum.

>>697914

he didn't mention sexuality just because sex can belong to the category of "good" or "sacred" things, but because he perceives communion to be actually sexual in nature. Sexual in the human sense, i.e carnality and coitus. Listen to him carefully.

It's not some platonic abstract sex devoid of human nature.

>>697914

Describing something as having a sexual nature that can only be understood in the context of sexuality is the opposite of a metaphor friend

>>697912

The smoke of Satan is in the catholic church.

Non infallible synod saying retarded shit.

Nothing new. You guys should see this small synods in the middle ages.

>>697836

Where is this from?

>>697983

2015 Synod on the Family press conference.

>>697943

>Non infallible synod

>>Non infallible

lol

Anyone know the cleric who said this in the video?

>>698090

>Why don't people just go stanist, or New agers or light workers, instead of forcing Christianity into New Age satanism.

Why not become a LARP Satanist outside the church, instead of a real-life in-the -flesh one inside it? I think that's a self-answering question.

>These (most likely compromised individuals) just don't care about what their doing.

Ohhh, I don't agree there. I mean, of course there's some people who are doing bad things, but aren't sure or don't care. Every group in the world has those kinds. But there are also people who know exactly what they are doing.

Now I don't know what kind Thomas is, but he's clearly not doing the best for the church. That much is certain.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-consultant-fr.-thomas-rosica-saying-mass-for-dissident-pro-lgbt-gro

>>698084

>*stares in pedophile*

>>697844

>Sounds a little awkward, but modern societies relationship to sexuality is perverse

So is the Vatican's, if you haven't heard. I'm sure this new sexy eucharist doctrine is fundamental to these gay priests' rationalization of their behavior. Sounds like he's grooming the room.

>>697912

>the shadow priesthood is a gnostic sex magick cult

This is the most plausible explanation I've heard so far; they really are true believers, but in a satanic inversion.

As a Protestant, inquisition when? The Catholic Church is the face of Christianity, being what, 60% of all Christians? I want nothing more than to see these sodomites and cultists purged from the church.