>Be gaytheist>Claim to be a free thinker>Believe in scientific (((studies))) like a good goy

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

Christanon 09/01/18 (Sat) 12:32:19 a1de75 No.695133

>Be gaytheist

>Claim to be a free thinker

>Believe in scientific (((studies))) like a good goy

Christanon 09/01/18 (Sat) 22:03:37 9f8af8 No.695334

Shitty bait.

Although I do recognise the vast problems of the modern peer-review and journalling process: hacking p-values, falsifying data, unreproducible results, the lack of reproduction studies in general, and so on, you don't need to sneer like that.

Christanon 09/02/18 (Sun) 00:39:42 cd4f31 No.695391

>>695334

You're a retard

Christanon 09/02/18 (Sun) 01:10:41 64dba5 No.695400

>>695391

>thorough explanation of why scientific studies are not entirely reliable

<you’re retarded

Christanon 09/02/18 (Sun) 01:44:59 c50445 No.695409

File: 46214ce32f22daf⋯.jpg (721.82 KB, 2808x1872, 3:2, st-nicholas-russian-orthod….jpg)