>>682286
Again, go back to philosophy. The Evidence you keep asking For. That people have already been showing. Historical Eye witness, Archeological, Oral etc. Is Already there. It's your Philosophy that's the issue. It's just Like Mr. Lewis said on his writings of Miracles, if even we were to see a physical appearance, of even a living saint, Ghostly figure etc. Ie, The five sense, it goes back to philosophy, cause if we come to the table that miracles don't exist then we will never believe in them. And we see that would be a miracles would just be written off as an, illusion, Hallucination, or the modern day approach aliens. Good vid on this. You've already most likely judging from your post determined that the resurrection has never happened, not because of their not being boatloads of evidence, but due to a philosophy that says, im assuming that miracles can never happen. Or maybe just a personal grudge that it could never happen. But in Philosophy if you do like hume did and take the approach he did with miracles. You're just running in a circle at that point.
One other thing, is the concept as the orthodox call it Ancestral Sin, that being man is fallen. And this is the problem that the protestants, and even Catholics have. Is that they assume man, is like this Neutral being. Where he could just start our neutral and determine the evidence in a courtroom setting. This, is another philosopher Jay dyer, who lays down the transcendental argument well here. https://youtu.be/141yfwCOja0