>>677625
This is a misreading of late antiquity and medieval philosophy. Most early fathers believed in the worth of some pagan philosophy, believing that you shouldn't toss the baby out with the bathwater. St Basil the Great even recommends it in his Address to Young Men, advising young men to treat pagan philosophy like bees treat flowers - take what is good, but not necessarily everything.
>Constantine
This is a serious claim to make, so I would like some sort of subsantiation. Even if you take the fact that the Western Church suffered a kind of intellectual "slump" (although it didn't, really), the old scholarly tradition was still alive and well in the East.
Also, Aristotle wasn't "The" Philosopher because he was the only one people knew, he was "The" philosopher because he was considered the best. This would be like arguing that St Paul was the only apostle because of how many FAthers referred to him as "The" apostle.
>The Churches didn't know what to do, they dealt in dogma and communities, not in rhetoric or debates.
I don't know where you are getting your information from, but disputation with pagans and Jews was a real thing up until the Reformation, with missions going as far as China and Japan do debte the veracity of the Christian religion against local priests.